Aquinas Proof For God's Existence

Improved Essays
Significant evidence for God’s existence has failed to settle the ongoing debate regarding whether or not God exists. Philosophers have formulated theories to either prove or disprove God’s existence. Evidently, there is not a correct theory since God’s existence can actually ever be proven, however, there are philosophers who are more successful in arguing for their views of God’s existence compared to other philosophers. Thomas Aquinas, a renowned philosopher and regarded as one of the greatest Christian theologians, philosophized about the existence of God. Aquinas’ five ways thoroughly explain how God exists by noting how certain notions in our universe cannot work solely on their own. Thomas Aquinas’s proof for the existence of God is …show more content…
Self-evident propositions are propositions in which the evidence of its truth lies in the proposition itself. Aquinas says “God exists” is a self-evident proposition in itself. Which is true, but just stating “God exists”, does not permit for those who do not believe God exists, to understand how the proposition will prove any existence. In order for a proposition to be self-evident to us, there must be an understanding in addition to the proposition being self-evident within itself. An atheist may argue that solely saying “God exists” does not imply he actually exists, there has to be further analysis in order to make an atheist question whether or not God exists. Aquinas does not rely exclusively on self-evident propositions for his argument for God’s existence, his argument for God’s existence answers the proposition and guides us through the five ways in which prove that God does in fact …show more content…
There are two types of existence that Aquinas introduces: necessary and contingent existence. Aquinas’ third way is the concept of necessary and contingent existence. As humans, we are contingent beings; we at one point had no existence, are born into existence and when we die we no longer exist again. In order for a contingent being to exist, there must be a necessary being that does not go out of existence like a contingent being does. In order for our existence to occur there had to be a being that existed before us in order to allow for our existence. Considering we exist, there must be a necessary being that allowed contingent beings to exist. That necessary being is God because it is impossible for a contingent being to come from a contingent being in the beginning of time because there was a point where the contingent beings did not exist, so the necessary being had to have initially intervened to create the first contingent being. The fourth way, Aquinas elaborates on human characteristics, ranging from awful to excellent, but he comments on there’s a being that is the maximum of greatness, a being that is the embodiment of perfection, which Aquinas says is God. The fifth way that God exists is the movement towards the final end. There are objects that are non-intelligent which require guidance in order to reach the final end. If these objects do not receive

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes uses the idea of existence being a property and an aspect of perfection to try to prove God’s existence while Anselm uses the concept of God existing in the understanding rather than reality to do so. Descartes’s argument is unsuccessful because existence is not an actual property. Anselm’s argument is unsuccessful because existing in reality does not cause a being to be greater than a being that only exists in the understanding. The ontological argument is unsuccessful in proving God’s existence. Descartes’s ontological argument for the existence of God revolves around the idea of perfection.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then mocks the analogy of faith offered by the theist, insults God’s works, and concludes that faith in God is foolish. Once again, however, McCloskey uses the fact that there is evil in the world to suggest that God does not exist. In fact McCloskey states, “It is because evil exist that we believe God does not exist.” But McCloskey is disregarding, in a few sentences, the most important proof of God’s existence and that is “faith.” The analogy that the theist gives for faith is good, but having faith in God is special and so much more. It has been said in philosophy that faith is not a reason of proof that God exist. I respectfully disagree because I believe it is “the” reason to believe that God exists.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawkins: Writing In recent discussion of Dawkins’ “Arguments about God’s existence”, a controversial issue has been whether he offers a strong and valid argument about religion. Some argue that his paper is filled with false assertions about religion and the existence of God. From this perspective, Dawkins is proving that God doesn’t exist on false claims such as heredity and Agnostic beliefs. On the other hand, however, others argue that his arguments stem from logic and reason. That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this view, there is not enough evidence to prove the creator or the creation time frame. However, in Philosophy of Religion, Evans and Manis differs greatly from the view previously mentioned. According to Evans and Manis, God is not a contingent being and if God did have a cause he would not be God. Evans and Manis go on to explain that the cosmological argument prove many of God’s characteristics. However, it does include some of the key elements of a theistic concept of God.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (P4) Thus, if God exists only in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God. (P5) However, we cannot imagine something that is greater than God because it is a contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined. (C1) Therefore, God does exist in reality. In his argument, he does not clearly differentiate the word “God”. The word “God” should have two meanings: one is God who exists in reality and the other one is God who exists in the mind.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will discuss how Anselm specifies God in a vague manner making it difficult to understand, at first, what he is talking about. Also, I will discuss whether or not it is possible for there to be something that is greater than God himself. In Anselm’s text, “On the Ontological Argument,” he starts by saying that something than which nothing greater can be thought could be an idea or an understanding. He explains how something than which nothing greater can be thought “cannot be nonexistent even in thought.” (132). To begin, he describes something in which nothing greater can be thought as an understanding.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God. Manis and Evans make the observation that God is not a contingent being so it is unnecessary to provide an explanation of his beginnings. They point out that God would not be God if we humans were able to trace His origins. Through this reasoning we can believe that God is the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone. So, within his writing Thomas is seeking ways on how to prove God exists using logic. While as a rationalist, Descartes saw reason as his primary source of knowledge. And, using his Meditations, mathematics, and skepticism sought to prove a higher substance (God) had to exist. Historically, not much is know if Descartes truly believed in God, or for the sake of being published hid his atheism.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, while taking into account the lack of present evidence, the argument for God’s existence based on his apparent creation of the universe is lacking with insufficient credibility to go behind it. The attitude of skepticism, appealing to science and the scientific method as ways of determining what is true, drives critical thinking and applying a variety of information from several sources to reach a fair conclusion. Conclusively, while many arguments exist attempting to exist God’s existence, the cosmological argument does not succeed, failing to provide sufficient reasoning for the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The end argument of the whole argument on Possibility and Necessity concludes by saying, “this all men speak of as God,” but it is not justified why this being would be defined as God. God is a conscious being but Aquinas’s argument does not provide reason why that first cause and necessary being must be conscious. In one of Aquinas’s works, the Summa Theologiae, he gives an assertion of the existence of God in which both the opponents and audience were familiar with the background and philosophical outlooks of the subject at hand. Some of these people included Christian scholars and followers of certain Muslim and Jewish philosophers. In this sense, Aquinas was, ‘preaching to the choir,’ or to all who already accepted the existence of God, as presented in, An Examination of Thomas Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments as found in the Five Ways (Foutz, 1999).…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays