Aquinas Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
In his argument Aquinas believe is important to prove God's existence, although god existence appears self-evident to many, not eveyone is on the same page because everyone has their own opinion on whether or not god exist. Most of the time you have to presuppose God's existence. I believe he wants to make his point clear and give proof of his words by providing as with his five different proofs.
Aquinas' proof of God's existence are very decrepit. I don’t feel that his argument is competitive enough to prove the existence of God, since it is something that so many ppeople around the world have many different opinions on. For someone who is a believer his argument is rather unnecessary. As I read the argument, I was waiting on the moment

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    so of course the use of his work will be to prove and not disprove the claim. All the works cited are in support of his argument no…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever desired for a short, reasonable response that will please both the brain and the soul? In the pursuit of basic human rights, numerous individuals have searched for this fulfillment in religion. Webster defines religious as one`s belief in God, as well as rules used to worship a God. Since the beginning of time, religion was questioned, and it`s origin; consequently, they headed toward the sea to find some answers. Although we are not able to confirm the existence of God, we can provide proof of the power of religion.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquinas is a Catholic saint that that is an immensely influential philosopher and theologian one of his argument is that God created an ordered natural world and God also created man's ability to use reason. For me yes it’s still logcal to believe in this account of Aquinas, as a person that came on a Catholic school in my high school days but on the society today many of the people didn’t use this God’s gift they will just think themselves on being in a higher ground because if you are higher than others you have the power, money and authority on what you want to do. They didn’t use it to have logical reason on the natural word basis that we should have a balance standing in our society.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas double-effect reasoning comes as moral questions treating the moral topics with nature of human action, action, virtues, vices, sins, grace and faith surrounding the analysis of self-defense in order of judging human action. Peter Knauer looks at double effect as the basis for every moral judgment. When you have a proportional reason for doing what you are doing then what might appear to be a direct killing because of the proportionate reason it becomes an indirect killing. Or what appears to be moral evil, if you have a proportionate reason for doing what your doing then it becomes a physical evil. Death row is an example of direct killing.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline two related skeptical arguments made by Montaigne, explicate them, and then provide Descartes response to these arguments, followed by a brief examination to determine which argument hold more persuasive power. I will begin by outlining two arguments presented by Montaigne, and then expand upon them to better explain their meaning and significance. The first argument I will discuss is the seventh argument presented by Montaigne in his work on skepticism, and proceeds as follows; “To judge appearances that we receive from subjects, we would need a judicatory instrument; to verify that instrument, we would need demonstration; to verify the demonstration, an instrument; here we are going round in a circle. Since the senses cannot…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Aristotelian Triad is one of many ways to produce an argument. The proofs of the method include ethos, or credibility, logos, or logic, and pathos, or emotion. Each part has its necessary place in every argument because each one affects the audience in a different way. By using each facet of the triad, one can be sure to provide a well rounded case for any occasion that will appeal to everyone on some level. In the United States, we look to our Presidents for leadership in times of trouble.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    YES I will argue that being dead will not be bad for the person who dies. I will do so by first constructing the Epicurean approach to the badness of the state of death with several minor clarifications, before highlighting the inadequacies of standard anti-Epicurean arguments operating with counterfactual theories of harm in refuting Epicurus when his argument is interpreted within the parameter of death as a state. Additionally, as Epicureanism’s break with commonsense values is often what motivates the search for a metaphysics compatible with the morality of killing, I aim to reduce the inclination of those who desire to countenance Epicurus in a revisionist manner by reconciling commonsense values- most notably, the morality of killing-…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas is building of his understanding that God is self-subsistent existence and supplying being to all of His created things. Aquinas begins his argument by explaining that God is in everything, but not as a segment of their essence or even as an accident. He refers back to when he explains the existence of God and says God as an “efficient cause” of the being of the thing . To understand this, we should remember the five ways from ST I.2.3 that prove God’s existence, but specifically the second…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the argument doesn’t have actual proof that God was the beginning of time; Aquinas just assumes that God is the root cause because we don’t have the knowledge to prove otherwise. So perhaps it is easier to come to a conclusion that appears to prove God, than to prove nothing. The main flaw in the argument is that Aquinas states that everything must have sufficient reasoning but God exists without one, so from this it could be concluded that God doesn’t exist: He has no reason…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The teleological argument is an argument attempting to prove God’s existence based on the evidence of design and order in the universe. It works based on the belief that there must have been an intelligent designer, and the only being powerful enough to have created the universe is God. The argument is a posteriori and inductive; it looks at our experience of the universe and draws inferences from it. As they are based on inferences, these conclusions are statements of probability rather than perfect proofs. Many philosophers have worked on the teleological argument – for example, Thomas Aquinas and William Paley.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument states that God is the most perfect thing possible. After defining god as the greatest conceivable thing he asks “what is greater god as an idea or god as an existing thing?” if it is agreed that existing is always better than not existing god as an existing being is greater than god as an idea, therefore god must exist as if god is just an idea then he is not the most perfect conceivable thing. God must exist by…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The existence of God is always important in the aspect of philosophy. St. Thomas Aquinas explains what he believes is the five reasons god exists. The five reasons he believes why God exist is the Argument from Motion, Efficient Causes, Possibility and Necessity, Gradation of Being, and Design. The definition of God means that which nothing greater can be meant. St. Aquinas is a known philosopher for his discussions of the relationship between faith and the reasons, including the five reasons and proof why God existence is true, while developing Aristotelian doctrines within the church (PBF 42).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays