Although punitive approaches to criminal justice are still dominant today, the public acceptance of restorative justice programs is gradually increasing in the United States. Current restorative justice programs have made significant changes in communities all over the country, such as the Longmont Community Justice Partnership in Colorado. The main goal of this organization is to guide victims and offenders into strengthening their relationships while repairing the harm done by the crime. This restorative program has demonstrated to law enforcement administrators and the community in general how effective an approach to justice without punishment can be.…
For example, Jacquie’s mother was murdered by first time offenders who were convicted and imprisoned. However, Jacquie was emotionally devastated due to continuous court proceedings in which she had to express her victim impact statements. The restorative justice model incorporates personal values, so it was a valuable opportunity for the offenders and Jacquie to gain insight regarding the reasons for the murder and the sharing of compassion and emotions that was not possible in the state-based justice process. According to Jacquie, the experience with the restorative justice model was accommodating because it allowed the offenders to show empathy, mutual understanding, and accountability for the crimes that they have committed. Jacquie was extremely fearful and suffered from anxiety before engaging in a collaborative interaction with one of the offenders, but she noticed that the offender demonstrated great remorse and shame for his horrendous involvement.…
Restorative justice is used in a community setting and has many applications including neighborhood accountability boards where many members of the community volunteer to be involved with the process and juvenile conference committees focusing on reversing harm done by juvenile offenders (Hasset-Walker, 2002, Bazemore, 2005). McCold (2008) sums up the central plan of restorative justice as a victim/offender in person meeting where they decide how to address the sanctions to the crime (Cullen & Johnson, 2012). Restorative justice would satisfy the needs of the victim to have a deep involvement with offenders and the outcome out the…
1. What do we learn from these early pioneers about an event in the history of restorative justice that has not made it to the history books on restorative justice? Historical events, especially ones that do not make it to history books, hold a lot of information about the history of change and the challenges involved. The particular story shared in Chapter 2 shows us that some parts of the criminal justice system have resisted the change brought about by the restorative justice movement. The commissioner of corrections in Minnesota during 1973 fought against the benefits of approaching offender rehabilitation from the viewpoints of restorative justice.…
On November 7, 2014, Thomas MacMillan wrote an article of why Restorative Justice Can Bring About the Healing Process. Restorative Justice is, “ Participants gather in circles to try to resolve problems through discussion, rather retribution.” So why would Restorative Justice not work if it helps people heal. Three good reasons why Restorative Justice does work is because it stops student violence, reduces suspensions, and helps troubled teens to open up to the problem.…
In certain states the rights of the victim have been so clearly heard that sentencing focus strongly on the restoration and making whole again aspect of the criminal justice process. The concept is “Restorative Justice” (FAMM - Families Against Mandatory Minimums. (07/2011) in which goals are set forth involving victim restitution, victim-offender mediation programs, community service, and conditions of probation. In conclusion the involvement of the victim has become an integrate part of the court system, in the sentencing and the rehabilitation of the…
In the article “When Traditional Disciplinary Actions Don’t Work, Restorative Justice Can Bring About the Healing Process.” it states that “Fania Davis, head of the organization Restorative Justice of Oakland Youth, helped the school implement restorative justice circles. In a single year, suspensions dropped by 87 percent and not a single student was expelled.” Restorative Justice is a system in which people are punished by facing their victim and or offender face to face to work on the healing process. Restorative Justice originated from the Native Americans.…
For instance, New Zealand exercises family group conferencing and victim-offender mediation, Native Americans utilize circle sentencing, South Africa conducts conferences, and Japan carries out shaming ceremonies. Despite the differences in models of restorative justice, there are core elements and values that characterize the concept. John Braithwaite, who has written about and researched extensively restorative justice, delineates its core values as “healing rather than hurting, moral learning, community participation and community caring, respectful dialogue, forgiveness, responsibility, apology and making amends.” He hypothesizes that the process works best with “a specter of punishment in the background, but never threatened in the foreground,” illustrating that restorative justice alone might not be sufficient with all offenders, victims, or…
A brief review of the book “The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” by Howard Zehr, is based upon one idea, how should this society respond to wrong doings and what should be done with the victims and offenders? The book begins by telling us that the criminal justice system is not meeting the needs of the people with in that system, ultimately the system is failing however there still may be some good qualities. Zehr expresses that, “restorative justice is an attempt to address some of the needs and limitations,” (3) and by doing this he first tells his audience what restorative justice is not, to give us, his readers a better understanding of what it really is. Also to you could say that he does this so we can have a stronger foundation while learning what, The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” is and not being completely biased…
Deterrence should be considered one of the primary objectives of the criminal justice system and criminal law because deterrence acts as a countermeasure against the probability of the occurrence of criminal acts in the future. Deterrence protects public from criminal acts because “The threat of punishment deters people from engaging in illegal acts” (Cassidy, n.d.). Restitution, on the other hand, is meant to give an opportunity to a perpetrator to rectify himself and to assimilate into the mainstream society, and such an act restores faith of the common public in the justice system, and this also provides opportunity to the justice system to refrain from providing long-term punishment mistakenly to an innocent. Retribution is a goal which must be accomplished by the criminal law in order to prohibit a perpetrator to roam free again and inflict untreatable wounds to the society. And, the objective of rehabilitation must be accomplished by the criminal justice system in order to transform a perpetrator into a responsible citizen and to thereby protect the society from yet another…
This policy proposal includes a brief introduction of restorative justice particularly focuses on youth justice conferencing. This paper will explain the penoligical principles underlying in restoration, and discuss the strength and weakness of youth justice conferencing. Finally, this paper will conclude with recommendation for future practice. Restorative justice is a framework that recognises accountability and the need to repair harm caused to victims and communities impacted by crime. It is a reform that seeks to engage all parties such as (victims, offenders, both their families or support persons, police officer and the facilitator) comes together to discuss the offence, its impact and what should be done to repair the harm, and resolve…
Restorative justice allows the offender to gather in a circle and interact with his or her victim in order to resolve the problem that has been created between the two young offenders. The article tells us that the kids that have done Restorative justice have either done really good or fine afterward. Taking responsibility for one’s actions can help heal both the offender and the victim. Restorative Justice actually cut down the percent of students being expelled in some schools. Restorative justice helps kids resolve their problems and forgive and forget about what happened.…
Integrating these approaches into correctional facilities can improve them and meet the needs of both offenders and victims out in the community. Theoretical Practices for Restorative Justice, Crime Prevention,…
Introduction: Restorative justice is the idea that harm caused by a crime can be repaired (Wallis, 2007) and that the victim and community can be restored to how it was previously, rather than resorting to punishing the offender…
Other than healing the victim, communication also rehabilitates the offender. It renders a second chance to the offender to repair the harm caused by him through a way other than imprisonment. Restorative justice fosters peace and healing but does not neglect the personal accountability. Thus, this leads to fundamental changes in people, relationships and communities. Hence, in simpler terms, restorative justice not only seeks to reform the criminal justice system, but also to create a holistic change in the way we do justice in the world.…