Thomas Aquinas For Arm Chair Theologians Summary

Improved Essays
My reading journal assignment was Aquinas for Arm Chair Theologians by Timothy Renick. I have a lot of respect for Thomas Aquinas. He argued against men like John Calvin and Martin Luther on subjects like man could still have free will and at the same time God could still be all knowing. He also created a theory that explained why there is evil in the world but allowed God to stay all powerful and all good.
Aquinas’s theory on the existence of evil was very interesting. He said that there is no such thing as evil. What we perceive as evil is goodness actually leaving an object. The article used an example of a flower to illustrate Aquinas’s theory. Imagine a healthy pretty flower, full colorful petals standing upright with its’ stalk and leaves green. This flower would be example of goodness. Let’s say that you left for the weekend and forgot to water this plant while your gone. You come back to see the same flower not as healthy. It is a little wilted, the stalk is slouched slightly leaning and the leaves are turning from a dark green to slight brown on the edges. This flower that was once the example of goodness has had some of goodness leave. The flower is not completely evil, but
…show more content…
On this topic Aquinas had some tough critics. John Calvin and Martin Luther argued that man does not truly have free choice. That everything is predestined to happen. Your born, you live your life good or band it was already in place and then you die and go to heaven or hell. Our lives and where we end up in our afterlives are predestined. Aquinas disagreed with them. Aquinas believed humans have free will. God rewards us with heaven or punishes us with hell depending on the choices that we are free to make. If God predestined someone to go straight to hell and if that was out of their control that in Aquinas’s eyes would make God

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas says that God gives us free will, but He does not cause sin; instead, sin comes from free will. Since God is all-good, He Himself can not sin, but since God gave us free will, He indirectly gave us the potential to sin. In a different reasoning, “Jesus consistently refrained from any indication of a full theodicy for humans now. Instead, he suggests, as indicated, that typical humans are not in a position now to understand God’s full purpose in allowing unjust suffering and evil” (Moser 196). Moser gives a Christological reason on theodicy by explaining man’s limited knowledge on the divine.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe Flannery O’Connor is an epistemological Thomist because she agrees with Aquinas when discussing knowledge, abstract ideas, and reason. O’Connor agrees with Aquinas by citing him multiple times in her essay and uses his statements as starting points and support for her discussions about art and writing and how each relates to knowledge. Firstly, O’Connor begins her essay discussing the nature of fiction by relating it directly to the beginning of knowledge. According to Gilson, Thomistic epistemology states that “‘whatever is received into something else is received according to the mode of the receiver’” (210).…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He contends that in nature, one can observe natural occurrences that happen repetitively time and time again, but there is a lack of correlation between the universe itself and an intelligent creator. (Speaks, 2006). The theory of evolution, which was not known in Aquinas’ day, is another scientific way to explain the natural order we see in the world. We look at the world today and understand that it is ordered from processes like natural selection, erosion, etc. Again, the basic principles of Aquinas’ arguments are refuted in a way that is more reasonable and sound in the world we live in…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas is building of his understanding that God is self-subsistent existence and supplying being to all of His created things. Aquinas begins his argument by explaining that God is in everything, but not as a segment of their essence or even as an accident. He refers back to when he explains the existence of God and says God as an “efficient cause” of the being of the thing . To understand this, we should remember the five ways from ST I.2.3 that prove God’s existence, but specifically the second…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability for Aquinas’ argument to overcome the objection of having a contradictory premise is still uncertain, although I have presented a possible response above. It is still unclear as to why the “first efficient cause”, or God, that Aquinas is arguing for would be able to create itself when he argues that nothing can create itself. It seems plausible to me that in order to be a first efficient cause, the phenomenon would have the utmost superior qualities. Therefore it would be able to create itself and not be subject to the same conditions as everything else in…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil is a complex issue within the Catholic faith. It is difficult to put a definition to what evilness is because it is not something that can physically be touched or seen. Philosophers such as, St. Augustine and Boethius, have proposed ideas that transform the way Catholics view evil, and help to give a better understanding of faith and God. These two philosophers have expressed their opinions on this very controversial topic in depth in Augustine’s Confessions and again in the Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius. The philosophers shared certain ideas, but have come to them each in different ways.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, land of the free and home of the brave. We pride ourselves on being unrestricted, we can choose: what we believe (spiritually and politically), what we want to be (career-wise and gender-wise), and where we want to go. But, what does it mean to truly be free? According to the Merriam-Webster the definition of free is, “not determined by anything beyond its own nature or being : choosing or capable of choosing for itself.” In other words, nothing controls people but them people themselves.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Praise Of Folly Analysis

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    By the late Middle Ages the Catholic Church had become the most powerful organization in the western world. More powerful than the government, the Church insisted that its clergy were not subject to the laws of secular kings, and thus could only be tried by the Church. Furthermore, the clergy went as far to sell indulgences to wealthy individuals, guaranteeing them remission of time in Purgatory. In contrast to Medieval times, the Renaissance was a period of questioning and discovery. People started to think independently and experiment with new ideas and concepts.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way ? The Argument from Intelligent Design. Aquinas concluded that common sense observation tells us that no object creates itself. In other words, some previous object had to create it. Aquinas believed that ultimately there must have been an UNCAUSED FIRST CAUSE (GOD) who began the chain of existence for all things.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas’s sees his conclusion as being correct with a reflection back to his premises because God is the reason that the world is intelligent. How else can these things be possible and have purpose behind them if they aren’t being guided by someone who has structure. In quote, he states “There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God” (PBF 44). Aquinas is basically saying overall that nothing just ends by chance, but by someone that is necessarily able to end it, which is his God. As Aquinas states within his fourth reason, he says “therefore there is something which is the cause of being, of goodness, and of whatever other perfection that there may be in things (PBF 44).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, people have the knowledge to know what they want to know. People would question how everything started and this would lead to there being a God who was perfect and created everything. On the other hand, Aquinas believes that there are forms of happiness that are in this life, but they are not perfect. That brings him to his point that seeing God is the form of true happiness. I do not believe his argument fully because it is obvious that he has had an upbringing with God of high importance.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this in mind I will refrain from focusing on Biblically arguing his statements, rather I will disprove his argument with simple logical reasoning that any religious or nonreligious person may agree with. Let’s get a better understanding of what Aquinas’ argument is. The argument of gradation in…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free will is an extremely important concept in John Milton’s Paradise Lost that greatly impacts the fateful decision made by Adam and Eve. Many questions are raised in the face of a notion such as free will, which prompt the reader and Milton to understand God’s logic and Adam and Eve’s reasoning for turning their backs on it. God makes his new creations “just and right / sufficient to have stood, though free to fall,” and, therefore, obtain the explicitly stated ability to turn against God. The first instance of free will the reader sees is Satan’s decision to rebel against God and attempt to defeat Him and all of the angels that joined him in his efforts. Although God experiences this defiance and is forced to punish Satan for his…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays