An apology is arguably the most effective way for a defendant, or other alleged violator of an accepted legal standard, duty or obligation, to demonstrate their assumed responsibility for a wrong committed.’ Whether an apology is heartfelt, or more calculated and pro forma, there is little question that when an apology is delivered, its maker has assumed at least moral responsibility for the act or omission in question.2 Societies tend to respect individuals who “own up” to their faults, admit mistakes, take responsibility for their conduct and offer an appropriate apology to any affected innocent persons.3 Radzik and Murphy explain that apologising is the most likely explicit means through which human errors of any kind are
An apology is arguably the most effective way for a defendant, or other alleged violator of an accepted legal standard, duty or obligation, to demonstrate their assumed responsibility for a wrong committed.’ Whether an apology is heartfelt, or more calculated and pro forma, there is little question that when an apology is delivered, its maker has assumed at least moral responsibility for the act or omission in question.2 Societies tend to respect individuals who “own up” to their faults, admit mistakes, take responsibility for their conduct and offer an appropriate apology to any affected innocent persons.3 Radzik and Murphy explain that apologising is the most likely explicit means through which human errors of any kind are