Apollo's Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
The outcome of this trial characterized the city of Athens to be unreasonable. Orestes, who murdered his own mother was proven not guilty. The votes were equal for both sides, resulting in Athena having the vote that would be the final verdict. In Apollo’s defense for reasoning as to why Orestes killing his mother was acceptable was “The mother of what is called her child is not the parent, but the nurse of the newly-sown embryo. The one who mounts is the parent, whereas she, as a stranger for a stranger, preserves the young plant, if the god does not harm it. And I will show you proof of what I say: a father might exist without a mother. A witness is here at hand, the child of Olympian Zeus, who was not nursed in the darkness of a womb, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This essay is going to be a argumentative essay about krakauer opinion of Chris McCandless. Krakauer mood changes throughout the book/story about how he feels about Chris he says a lot of stuff that he might disagrees and sometimes he agrees with him about it. Krakauer talk a lot of Chris because of the choices he made during the story and how he lived and how he tried to survive in the wild. I will also be talking about how he connects and the opposite of what he says about Chris McCandless. Krakauer didn't like Chris decisions about going in the wild because he was going to die there without any food or any place to stay or sleep or rest.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maunica responded very well to the intervention. Maunica stated, that she made decision to get up on time to go to school, going to all her classes, not to go to her friend house, and to pray. Maunica stated, friends, parents’ values, drugs, internet, news, and beliefs. Maunica stated, calling 911, fighting in school, sneaking out at night, and arguing with mom. Maunica stated, guilt for choosing the wrong decision, feelings bad for disappointing parents, and feelings of disapprove.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the Confederation government’s inability to collect taxes from the states, one of the most effective ways for states to pay their debts was to give up their western land holdings to the national government. Therefore, North Carolina, in 1783, gave up their western lands that are now known as East Tennessee. Settlers flooded this area as a new chance. When the land was finally ceded to the national government, the settlers and speculators kept their private property rights in the region.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was around this time that Gage helped with the new merge of the AWSA and the NWSA. However, the new National American Woman’s Suffrage Association (NAWSA) looked to the WTCU for support. Frances Willard and the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union (WTCU) began to enter the ranks of NWSA. Before this, the NWSA was a fringe movement with outlier members; on the other hand, the WTCU had nearly four times as many supporters and was considered a more acceptable movement for woman to be involved in. Gage was furious at the WTCU’s involvement and “was unwilling to compromise her position on the absolute necessity of religious freedom as a prerequisite for authentic women’s liberation.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maunica responded well to the activity. Maunica continues to make progress towards her goals. Maunica stated, anger. Maunica stated that she coping with her anger feeling in positive ways, like journaling and expressing her feel to others. Maunica stated that she used to bottle up her feelings and then would explode of s simple situation.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A 7-2 majority ruled on the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, citing a wide variety of constitutional grounds for support. One of the weakest arguments of this case was the argument for Dred Scott not being able to be classified as a citizen. As a result, he was not subject to the full right of freedoms and due process of law. Taney wrote that slaves lacked sovereignty and that they were not intended to be included by the framers of the Constitution (5). He writes that slaves were actually, “intended to be excluded from it.”…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Goldstein (1995) present ideas by Mahler and Winnicott regarding infancy and fused self-object, a different perspective is that, infants possess inborn awareness of the mother (p. 131, 134). This is because speaking from personal experience as a mother, one can hypothesize that infants have a sensitive sense of mother from birth, infants can differentiate a mother’s smell from those of others, and infants are sensitive to brightness although they have limited vision. One can also hypothesize that infants have some ability to track moving objects at close range, infants appear highly sensitive to pain, from the very beginning.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history, the presence of violence justified by the credence in godly figures is exemplified, especially in Aeschylus’ The Oresteia, and Homers’, The Odyssey. Although both archaic works concern the ideologies and practices of faith in the Greek mythological gods, the reasoning for violent actions and their means of justification differ in their aspiration for and fulfillment of vengeance, their justification through the divine, and their means of punishment. In The Oresteia, Orestes, the son of Agamemnon, was exiled from the House of Atreus by his mother, Clytemnestra, the Queen of Argos. Upon the return of Agamemnon from the Trojan War, Clytemnestra and her lover, Aegisthus, murdered Agamemnon due to his sacrifice of Iphigenia,…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    YES I will argue that being dead will not be bad for the person who dies. I will do so by first constructing the Epicurean approach to the badness of the state of death with several minor clarifications, before highlighting the inadequacies of standard anti-Epicurean arguments operating with counterfactual theories of harm in refuting Epicurus when his argument is interpreted within the parameter of death as a state. Additionally, as Epicureanism’s break with commonsense values is often what motivates the search for a metaphysics compatible with the morality of killing, I aim to reduce the inclination of those who desire to countenance Epicurus in a revisionist manner by reconciling commonsense values- most notably, the morality of killing-…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmondson responds to the opposing viewpoint by agreeing with the opposing perspective in a manner where she introduces the idea that she agrees to in a positive manner to later crush it and reveal the truth behind the opposing viewpoint. For example, on page 260 Edmondson mentions introduces the opposing view point “While it may seem that Walmart’s and Meijer’s of the world bring variety to their host towns, thereby adding to the local culture, these giants truly have the opposite effect” ( Edmondson 260).Through this sample we see how the opposing viewpoint has been introduced in the sense she agrees with the idea, but as she goes on she eventually acts against her opposing viewpoint. Big box stores are so popular according to Edmondson…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wisdom and pleasure of Edith Hamilton`s of “The House of Atreus” What choice would you make if you had a kill your mother because she killed your father? Would you leave your mother alone? But what if you are obligated to kill your father’s murder because the ancient laws of your gods tell you to do so? In the Edith Hamilton`s…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. Seneca would assess the benefactor’s attitude and action in accordance to his intention. Perhaps, it can be inferred that the giver was not “inclined to do what he does from the prompting of his own will,” as he, the well-wisher, explained that he is giving so charities “off [his] back.” For this reason, the benefactor’s money wouldn’t be deemed ‘generous,’ nor a ‘benefit’ because to Seneca, “the spirit of the action,” is of greater importance than all else. Evidence from the benefactor’s words suggests that he is merely making an offering to his “pride,” for he is trying to “please,” by “[looking] good in the community.”…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Furies who govern over this order are submissive to no alternative god, for, as they claim, "The Fates who gave us power made us free" (Eumenides, 352). They are moved to action by matricide, however, they stay indifferent to the killing of a husband by his wife. However, when this state of affairs, "where justice and bloody slaughter are the same" (Eumenides, 184) offers thanks to a more evolved style of justice concluding with the trial at the Areopagus, the forces of the social system, too, win the day. Apollo's arguments in defense of Orestes are intensely patriarchal, it supported the elemental notion that a woman's life is worth less than that of a man’s life. There are several inconsistencies in his forceful justification of Clytemnestra’s murder.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays