Sapir who was a linguistic anthropology (book2, P.237). He hypothesized that language detect and shape thought. He argue that although a society may speak the same language, it does not mean that we think the same. Also, that cultural shape thoughts but thought are something that is within individual. Moreover, he agree with boas with the cultural relativism. He mention the emic vs etic which is emic is the insider point of view and it to think and behave like a natives. Unlike, the etic which is the outsider point of view but using hypothesis and theory to apply it to a set of population that is being studied (lecture,
Sapir who was a linguistic anthropology (book2, P.237). He hypothesized that language detect and shape thought. He argue that although a society may speak the same language, it does not mean that we think the same. Also, that cultural shape thoughts but thought are something that is within individual. Moreover, he agree with boas with the cultural relativism. He mention the emic vs etic which is emic is the insider point of view and it to think and behave like a natives. Unlike, the etic which is the outsider point of view but using hypothesis and theory to apply it to a set of population that is being studied (lecture,