Table 2. Lofkënd, Corinth, Epidamnus, and Apollonia divided into adult age groups.
Adults Lofkënd Corinth Corinth prehistoric Epidamnus Apollonia Apollonia prehistoric
Young (18-34) 43 15 5 6 27 19
Middle-age (35-49) 30 26 7 19 60 19
Older (50+) 10 14 1 3 5 10
Total 83 55 13 28 92 48
Table 3. Individuals separated into male, females, and unknown at Lofkënd, Corinth, Epidamnus, and Apollonia.
Sex Lofkënd Corinth Corinth prehistoric …show more content…
Various archaeological excavations of Corinth took place during the early 20th century. There were numerous independent archaeological excavations which meant that many of the skeletal remains were curated under different practices. Therefore, the skeletal remains may not accurately represent the Corinthian population (McIlvaine, 2012). Those excavations disinterred 85 skeletons that predate colonial expansion. All materials were dated by Larry Angel from items found with the skeletons (McIlvaine, 2012). The remainder of the Corinthian skeletal remains are associated with colonial expansion. My study will include 55 colonial period and 13 prehistoric Corinthian adults (Table 2). Examination of Table 2 and Table 3 show this number of individuals in these collections divided by age and