The Apollonian And Dionysian Drives Play In Greek Tragedies

Improved Essays
What role do the Apollonian and Dionysian drives play in tragedy?
The Apollonian and Dionysian is a philosophical and artistic idea, or polarity, in light of specific elements of old Greek mythology. Numerous Western philosophical and scholarly figures have conjured this division in basic and innovative works.
In Greek mythology, Apollo and Dionysus are both children of Zeus. Apollo is the lord of reason and the discerning, while Dionysus is the divine force of the nonsensical and mayhem. The Greeks did not view the two divine beings as contrary energies or opponents, albeit frequently the two gods were twisted together by nature. The Apollonian depends on reason and sensible considering. By differentiation, the Dionysian depends on confusion and requests to the feelings and impulses.
The conflicting ideologies of the Dionysian and Apollonian are focal subjects inside Nietzsche's first significant work, The Birth of Tragedy. His thought of such rival powers of nature are principally used to break down Greek culture generally and Greek craftsmanship specifically, expressing that its part in Greek tragedy puts these plays at Greece's social zenith. Be that as it may, his thoughts welcome further social and political consideration as to their reverberating ramifications.
The Apollonian drive originates from the idea of Apollo, the Greek god of light, who is frequently said to control over the domain of the unsure, and is in this way emphatically identified with the possibility of individuation, through
…show more content…
Greek Tragedy indicates as opposed to losing one's individuality in the stream of passions and emotions the presence of these main impetuses get to be distinctly imaginative , whether it is through man's own character through self-restraint and balance, or in Art , particularly the plastic artwork and literature through the imposition of shape upon defiant material

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Seneca is able to adapt the Greek dramatic template, which includes divine powers having ultimate and decisive control in atrocious acts, to now putting the control in that of the culprit. The adaptation in approach between divine power and human intellect speaks volumes to what was taking place in society at the times. The difference in culpability allows the audience to reconsider who truly deserves the blame for such acts. In Seneca’s Medea you couldn’t blame a God or Goddess for such a brutal act-taking place as you could in Euripides Iphigenia at Aulis. Similarly, you could not argue the capacity for a human to commit such a brutal act on their own in Iphigenia at Aulis, like you can in Medea, for King Agamemnon was instructed by a greater power, unlike Medea’s mortal self who made her own…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medea Passion Analysis

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Medea explores the tension between reason and passion”. Discuss It is within the very nature of humans to isolate the polarised forces of reason and passion, yet within his Greek tragedy Medea, Euripides demonstrates the “fatal results” of possessing a predisposition for either frame of mind. Indeed, the antagonistic relationship between Medea and society best contextualises the gripping antithesis between maintaining an acceptable outward demeanour and laying bare our inner impulses respectively, however, at its core, this rupture is also self evident on an intrapersonal level as observed in Medea’s character. In presenting the consequences of the oppressive culture of Greek society, as well as the extent of destruction entailed with Medea’s…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prometheus Bound Analysis

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tragedy presents the benevolent hero Prometheus ,who was willing to be tortured for survival of humankind, while Zeus represents the dominant deity who cares very little about the survival of mankind. “ Prometheus Bound,” by Aeschylus presents a classical play of Greek tragedy by utilizing symbols to emphasize the relationship between good vs evil , rebellion, and power. In the Greek tragedy “Prometheus Bound”, Aeschylus utilizes power to criticize the selfish and oppressive nature of the human condition . Fire was one of humanity 's most important discoveries considering it gave them the ability to cook food, have light, and keep warm at night. Prometheus theft from Zeus in order to gift humanity with fire represents a challenge to Zeus’s authority.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both philosophers believe that the gods intervene in mortal affairs because of the fact that man is reckless by nature. Due to human nature, they make the assumption that there needs to be a type of divine presence to instantiate order amongst man and through the power of the gods, justice can be established. Although Hesiod would most definitely argue Zeus is the only god that holds this power (*Quote about Zeus seeing all in Works and days*) and Homer would say that power is distributed amongst many of the gods, they both agree that there is a strong divine attribute to justice as a…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thucydides Vs Herodotus

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A balance of opposites forms the core of Greek spirit, the core of what makes a Greek a Greek: there is a balance of individualism and community, a balance of rashness and reflection (e.g. Athens in the Mytilene debate (textbook 224)). Herodotus and Thucydides represent just such a balance – between consistency and inconsistency with respect to Greek ideals – in their lives, and as such they can be considered adequate symbols of the spirit of Greece. They deviate from and subscribe to Greek thought and habits in so many ways, and this contradiction ironically suggests they are apt symbols of Greek…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both dialogues have parallel compositions, and mirror each other in many ways, while contrasting in others. Phaedo and Phaedrus in their entireties contribute to Plato/Socrates general claim that the body imprisons the soul and is inherently bad. The two dialogues stress the necessity of escaping the body and ultimately reaching the forms. It is fair, since Phaedrus is a later dialogue, to assume that Plato is expressing his own ideas apart from Socrates, since they show a notable shift. From the analysis of two important Greek dialogues, a reader can take away an extensive understanding of the soul’s significance to the time period – in ancient Greece the view of the soul giving life to the body became widespread – and to Plato.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revenge is a powerful inhibitor that moves Odysseus and the Greek gods to enforce their pride above others. Homer emphasizes revenge as a strong motivator throughout the epic, through the episodes of Poseidon’s response after Polyphemus’s death and Helios’s cry for Zeus to destroy Odysseus’s crew, to explicate the assertion that revenge is…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Whitley’s article, titled, “Arthur Miller: An Attempt at Modern Tragedy, Whitley argues that All My Sons is a successful attempt at creating a modern version of a tragedy in Aristotle’s terms. He explains the characteristics of a tragic hero in which he mentions, “The hero of such a piece [Tragedy] must neither be perfectly virtuous...yet humanly fallible...” (Whitley 257). He points out that a tragic hero must NOT be perfect and righteous and must be capable of making human mistakes. Keller fits somewhat of an exact description Whitley gives as Keller is not righteous, blaming Deever for everything. He also makes a fatal error in judgement or a mistake in which he decides to send out the defective parts, becoming responsible for 21 deaths.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is god of order, harmony and rationalism. Dionysian principle stands for Dionysus’ qualities. Being son of Zeus and Semele, he is known as the god of disorder, irrationalism and passion. Nietzsche glorifies tragedy and claimes that it should be the unity of these two concepts because Apollonian principle represents visual arts, while Dionysian principle represents non-visual arts: The age of the earliest lyric poets…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human agency is demonstrated in Homer’s The Odyssey and Virgil’s The Aeneid through the story arcs of the characters of Odysseus and Aeneas. In the Odyssey, although Odysseus’ fate seems to be predetermined by the gods, it is actually influenced entirely by Odysseus’s own choices. In the Aeneid, however, Aeneas does not possess the same free will as Odysseus; his destiny is determined by the will of Zeus. Homer establishes the independence of the choices of mortals over the preordinations of the gods, while Virgil emphasizes the control the gods exercise over the fates of mortals. In Book V of The Odyssey, Zeus appears to at first show his dominion over the fate of Odysseus, commanding the messenger god Hermes, “Go tell that ringleted nymph…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays