Antonin Scalia Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Antonin Scalia was a very respected leader in his line of work. He was known as a conservative Republican who shared his transformative theories, writing, his unique personality and opinions. Scalia was known as an originalist and a believer in the living constitution. Scalia’s brilliant views made him the leader of the conservative intellectual renaissance in his three decades on the supreme court. Antonin Gregory Scalia was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, as the first Italian American to become a member of the supreme court. On Sunday, February 13, 2016, the Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, was announced dead; “He was having health issues...He died of natural causes.”i That day a core member of the …show more content…
With the majority of the Justice members being conservative nominees, the past presidential term was mainly dominated by conservatives. Now that Antonin Scalia is no longer in office, the even 4 by 4 split means that "many cases will revert back to the decision of the last court where they were heard –or in the Obama administration 's case, the federal rules or executive order issued".iii This issue has a large impact on the upcoming November, 2016 election, both presidential and Senatorial candidates will be affected. Democrats have the greatest opportunity to "retake the chamber" …show more content…
The qualifications to be nominated for the supreme court does not specify age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all justices must be trained in law. As stated in politico magazine, the person that President Obama Nominates must "be 'eminently qualified ' and will know that a judge 's job is to interpret, not make law".iv The President 's nominee met all these qualifications and beyond. Many Democrats believe that Merrick Garland is very qualified for the position; but GOP leaders refuse to "consider Garland, 63, saying their reservations were not personal but motivated by a desire for the American people to weigh in on Scalia 's replacement.”v Many Republicans say they will not consider the president 's nomination and they will not meet with the candidate no matter how qualified he is. Senate leader Mitch McConnell spoke to Justice nominee Merrick Garland over the phone "and told him not to bother stopping by".vi GOP leaders say their refusal to construct a hearing on the democratic presidential nominee is not personally motivated, but the American people should have a chance to weigh in on Scalia 's replacement. It is obvious that the decision is more of a political move based on the fact that "Obama 's choice could Tilt the ideological balance of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Price Too High Judge Charles Pickering was spending a January day hunting in 2001 with his son Chip Pickering, when he was asked if he wanted a recommendation from Senators Trent Lott and Thad Cochran to President Bush to be nominated for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. After already being asked once and declining, he decided he would not mind a change of pace and accepted the offer. After a lot of lengthy paperwork and background checks, Judge Pickering was put up for nomination on May 25, 2001. A day before Pickering was put up for nomination Republican Jim Jeffords decided to switch to an Independent, giving control of the Senate to the Democrats.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alyssa Mattson 2A Current Event #3 Despite mutual agreement between the Republican and Democratic parties, the Senate still could not pass a bill enacting criminal justice reform. It was believed that this overhaul bill would be the “bipartisan success story of the year”, according to New York Times writer Carl Hulse. However, this was not the case. Some Republicans Senators disagreed with the idea of reducing minimum sentences, as well as providing President Obama with a “legacy victory” nearing the end of his presidency.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scorpions: An Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of his career, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a total of seven justices to the United States Supreme Court. Professor of Law at Harvard, and author, Noah Feldman, focuses on the background and evolution of four of FDR’s most influential justice appointees—Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and Robert Jackson— throughout his book Scorpions. In the Supreme Court of FDR, and in our modern-day court, one often wonders how justices’ rulings are influenced. Throughout Scorpions, one may see FDR’s justices’ voting behavior demonstrates that a justice’s background, and their friendships, or vendettas against other members on the court, may impact voting behavior. In addition, there may be different degrees…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Out of the 112 justices only 17 have been Chief justices, and John G. Roberts is our current chief justice. Chief justice John G.Roberts has prepared his entire life to become a Justice. Through most of his decisions from; District of Columbia v. Heller, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and Obergefell v. Hodges, have shown how Chief Justice John Roberts stick to the attitudinal model rather than the rational choice theory. Even thought he has surprised some scholars in some decision further reinforcing my believe fiercely independent and personal approach to interpreting law. Chief justice John G. Roberts was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    18-Term Limit

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The significant arguments for implementing an 18-year term limit for Supreme Court justices are the unequality of presidential appointments, the political implications of judges’ retirements, and the idea that lifetime judges can become out-of-touch with American society. Implementing the 18-year term limit would allow for the appointment of a new judge every two years; therefore, every president would be able to nominate two judges in a four-year term. This change would account for the inequality in presidential influence on the Supreme Court. For example, Richard Nixon served as president for a year and half longer than Jimmy Carter, but Nixon appointed four judges to Carter’s zero. An 18-year term also takes the decision of when a justice…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted earlier typically president appoint the qualified candidate for Supreme Court justice whose views are aligned with president. Supreme Court justice have lifetime term limit. Let’s assume that Hillary Clinton win this election and elect the liberal justice and majority of the justice as same views as justice Breyer. This makes court to be too powerful and may overturn the more conservative…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be “above politics,” since they are there to just interpret the law and not argue politic, inevitably though, politics still manages to seep in. In fact the appointment of justices is, in reality, extremely political due to all the factors needed to be appointed. In order to be a justice three main characteristics are needed: ideology, ethnicity, and political experience. Each one has a profound impact in the appointment process. Interests groups are extremely concerned with the whole process because it could help or hurt the interests groups and it constitutions for generations if a justice is appointed that has contradictory views.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Senate is forced to follow rules writers quote “insane” because, they are only understood by very few people and incomprehensible. Lastly, a vote will then emerge from the Senate, up or down vote, on whether he got the number a votes required or fell short. If the judge receives an up…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays