Pros And Cons Of Antinomianism

Improved Essays
Antinomianism
Antinomianism defines the concept that there are no binding moral laws. It assumes that everything is relative. For instance, the ethical system assumes lying is can be neither right nor wrong. Some of the basic beliefs of antinomianism includes that there are no God given moral regulation and laws. They also argue that there is no God or he has not set any standards on moral laws on the people. Another belief is that there are no timeless moral regulations and regulations (Singer, 2013). Thus, all the laws followed are temporary and might change from different aspects. Finally, the model suggests there are no laws set against laws. Generalism This ethical system supports the ethical laws that are overall binding. For example, lying is generally wrong, but in some cases, it is acceptable. In some instances, the generalists can be known as utilitarian, since they believe in the importance of ethical laws in assisting people to determine which actions will offer greatest benefits to the society. The basic beliefs includes that morality is identified by whether the impacts of the actions will bring benefits or destruction to the society (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2014). Secondly, it also suggests that if the actions lead to
…show more content…
It suggests that individuals are responsible to maintain the conflicts. Thus, it argues that people should choose to commit reduced sins and request for forgiveness. This implies that lying is a sin, but it can be forgiven. The basic beliefs of the conflicting absolutism ethical system are mainly based on the biblical understanding. Firstly, it suggests that god’s moral laws are absolute. Secondly, it claims that moral conflicts cannot be avoided. Thirdly, it suggests that individuals have the responsibility to engage in lesser evil (Crossan, Mazutis & Seijts, 2013). Apart from all, the ethical system argues that the sins can be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this command, we can assure the goodness, kind, and love from him. For his point on moral accountability, he states how God hold every person’s action accountable and that if something is wrong, you will be punished and a right action will be exonerated. According to Craig, if God does exist, then so does theism. Craig also argues about theism if it is false. If theism is false, then there is no reason for flourishing and objective moral values, duties, or moral accountability.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Moral Relativism

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After looking at this video I do not believe that there are any throughgoing moral relativists. Even Martin Luther King Junior was not thorougoing moral relativits. Thoroughgoing moral relativists believes that there is no difference on how people “should” behave, as oppose to how people believe they should behave. Moral relativism is the view that what's morally right or wrong always depends on your culture or society. Dr. Robert George states in the video that it would be hard to live life as a consistant moral relativist who does not make any kinds of moral claim and supposes anything that anybody did was acceptable and nothing could be wrong (Colson Center for Christian Worldview, n.d., series 2).…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral nihilism is the view that within ethics nothing is inherently moral or immoral, and neither your opinion or mine matters in the end. This view also believes that there are no universal "oughts." Meaning that there is nothing anyone ought to do such as protect someone. I don’t believe anyone really follows moral nihilism, they might think they do. I just don’t see how you could think that everyone has their own truth and everyone is right.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fletcher takes exception with people who follow this philosophy, viewing them as “anarchic” and “unprincipled.” Situation ethics is an moral belief-system placed between these two extremes; it approaches moral dilemmas with the principles of the person’s particular tradition. However, the ‘situationist’ is prepared to compromise these principles if love would be better served by doing so; he “follows a moral law or violates it according to love’s…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, God cannot give human beings something such as reason or free will and simultaneously withhold that thing (Lewis 561). Thus, the law of contradiction that applies to human beings also holds true to…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divine command theory is the idea that certain actions are morally good or morally bad because they are what God wills for us. God’s demands determine what is right or wrong. What he tells us to do is right, and what he tells us not to do is wrong. This theory states that the only thing that makes an act morally wrong is that God forbids doing it, which implies…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essentially, Bentham believes that none of these (natural) rights exists in a state of nature because in such a state, nobody has any rights as people have the right to everything. Thus, no one has certain guaranteed rights that are secure. In his critique, Bentham argues that…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The major purpose of living is not to acquire all the required comfort or else natural evil would be unjustifiable. Natural evil provides a platform for test and challenges hence natural evil provide a basis for a fair test to all. The natural evils take place naturally, hence anyone is prone to through it irrespective of whether you make good or evil decisions as per the prior argument. We would not quite be living simply because of the natural evil, though as human beings who are meant to go through temptations, we live to overcome the evils. God exists as omnipresent and omnipotent; therefore, He understands natural evil and should eliminate it for us so that we live without suffering (Hick, 72, 78, 83).…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Susan Wolf's Moral Saint

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Susan Wolf describes the moral saint as the person whose every action is as morally good as it can be. Wolf summaries’ from this that a Kantian and utilitarian moral saint would be ‘unpleasant and possibly disturbed psychological type’. Throughout essay I will be breaking down this statement, and looking at the qualities of a Kantian moral saint and a Utilitarian moral saint, to see the validity of Wolf’s statement. My personal opinion on Wolf’s argument is to agree with her statement but to understand her argument one must understand what a moral saint is, as it is possible for a divide to come between good motives and good actions between good and honorable character and the ability to perform good actions. Wolf discusses two kinds of…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays