Pros And Cons Of Antinomianism

Antinomianism defines the concept that there are no binding moral laws. It assumes that everything is relative. For instance, the ethical system assumes lying is can be neither right nor wrong. Some of the basic beliefs of antinomianism includes that there are no God given moral regulation and laws. They also argue that there is no God or he has not set any standards on moral laws on the people. Another belief is that there are no timeless moral regulations and regulations (Singer, 2013). Thus, all the laws followed are temporary and might change from different aspects. Finally, the model suggests there are no laws set against laws. Generalism This ethical system supports the ethical laws that are overall binding. For example, lying is generally wrong, but in some cases, it is acceptable. In some instances, the generalists can be known as utilitarian, since they believe in the importance of ethical laws in assisting people to determine which actions will offer greatest benefits to the society. The basic beliefs includes that morality is identified by whether the impacts of the actions will bring benefits or destruction to the society (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2014). Secondly, it also suggests that if the actions lead to
…show more content…
It suggests that individuals are responsible to maintain the conflicts. Thus, it argues that people should choose to commit reduced sins and request for forgiveness. This implies that lying is a sin, but it can be forgiven. The basic beliefs of the conflicting absolutism ethical system are mainly based on the biblical understanding. Firstly, it suggests that god’s moral laws are absolute. Secondly, it claims that moral conflicts cannot be avoided. Thirdly, it suggests that individuals have the responsibility to engage in lesser evil (Crossan, Mazutis & Seijts, 2013). Apart from all, the ethical system argues that the sins can be

Related Documents