Each source reveals bias through either the author’s claims, the evidence used in the author’s claims or through the author's ways of persuading the audience to either be in support of the transgender bathroom bill or to be against it. I would say that the interpretation of misinformation comes from both the reader and the writer because the writer may inform the audience of their own viewpoint along with facts and the reader would be the one that would have their own way of interpreting the given information. Based on the the interpretation of the author as well as the viewpoint, the audience is able to have different interpretations of the given information, which can shape the outcome of the next author’s article. My topic is the Transgender
…show more content…
Fox News documents that North Carolina's bathroom bill limits peoples to public restrooms aligned with their gender at birth. The bill prompted a backlash that threatened to hurt the state’s economy which was revamped by lawmakers. This article falls under the neutral category.
The last source I will be using is “All States Anti Transgender Legislation Bathroom Bills." written by Refinery29. Refinery29 argues that transgender issues are on people’s minds more now, than ever. The author of the article provides statistical facts about the bathroom bill that are accurate. The author of the article does not seem biased. This article falls under the positive …show more content…
The bill prompted a backlash that threatened to hurt the state’s economy which was revamped by lawmakers. This article falls under the neutral category. The intended audience is the general public. This can be seen through the quote, But by virtue of its Lone Star state setting, SB6 is poised to have an outsized impact on a large slice of the American transgender population-one that is already coping with an archaic birth certificate policy that will only magnify the bill's effects.” This statement shows how the author doesn’t give the audience his personal viewpoint. It is credible because the author keeps a neutral tone and standpoint throughout his work. We can see this through the quote, Transgender people may have to travel to a different county to locate a court that will accommodate their request. And even when they people do find a willing judge, the process takes time.” The author gives the audience a statement that is similar to others seen in different articles that remain neutral, This article is not biased because the author does not take a side when informing the audience. We can see this through the quote, “By contrast, even a state like (http://www.transequality.org/documents/state/north-carolina) North Carolina will accept a notarized physician's letter after surgery to update the sex field on a transgender person's birth certificate. In California,
Fox News documents that North Carolina's bathroom bill limits peoples to public restrooms aligned with their gender at birth. The bill prompted a backlash that threatened to hurt the state’s economy which was revamped by lawmakers. This article falls under the neutral category.
The last source I will be using is “All States Anti Transgender Legislation Bathroom Bills." written by Refinery29. Refinery29 argues that transgender issues are on people’s minds more now, than ever. The author of the article provides statistical facts about the bathroom bill that are accurate. The author of the article does not seem biased. This article falls under the positive …show more content…
The bill prompted a backlash that threatened to hurt the state’s economy which was revamped by lawmakers. This article falls under the neutral category. The intended audience is the general public. This can be seen through the quote, But by virtue of its Lone Star state setting, SB6 is poised to have an outsized impact on a large slice of the American transgender population-one that is already coping with an archaic birth certificate policy that will only magnify the bill's effects.” This statement shows how the author doesn’t give the audience his personal viewpoint. It is credible because the author keeps a neutral tone and standpoint throughout his work. We can see this through the quote, Transgender people may have to travel to a different county to locate a court that will accommodate their request. And even when they people do find a willing judge, the process takes time.” The author gives the audience a statement that is similar to others seen in different articles that remain neutral, This article is not biased because the author does not take a side when informing the audience. We can see this through the quote, “By contrast, even a state like (http://www.transequality.org/documents/state/north-carolina) North Carolina will accept a notarized physician's letter after surgery to update the sex field on a transgender person's birth certificate. In California,