The mixed member proportional system voting system reflects what the voter wants more
Members of the political party are added, one at a time to make the council more proportional. Tuatara is the most over-represented and kea the most under represented, so kea get the first empty seat. This continues, adding one kea at a time, until both tuatara and kea are over represented and kakapo is under represented, so they get the final seat. (CGP Grey, September 26th, 2011).
If the mixed member proportional system is more accurate in its representation of what the voters desire, and first past the post has repeatedly shown to fail in that regard, then mixed member proportional must be an improvement over first past the post. Logically speaking, in a democratic government, if a voting system doesn’t accurately represent the way that people voted, it should be replaced. A mixed member proportional system would push America on the way towards having an ideal …show more content…
Without the two-party system, America would be more representative of the people that it envelopes, and should anti-intellectualism be less prevalent, America could lead the world into tomorrow. America could achieve excellence if the people were only motivated to change.
Reference page
10 essential pros and cons of a two party system. (ND) Retrieved from ///////https://greengarageblog.org/10-essential-pros-and-cons-of-a-two-party-system
Ambler, C. (January 6th, 2014) 8 ways to combat anti-intellectualism. Medium. Retrieved from ///////https://medium.com/@dailyzen/8-ways-to-combat-anti-intellectualism-95ccb2627185
CGP Grey. (September 26th, 2011). Mixed-Member proportional representation explained. ///////[Video file]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU
Maxwell, B. (2017, July 2). Professors under attack. Tampa Bay Times [St. Petersburg, FL], p. 3. \\\\\\\Retrieved from