Anti Beauty Myth Analysis
Both “Anti-Beauty …show more content…
(Shteir para 12) Infomercials are slightly biased in nature as they are selling the idea of the author therefore these anti-beauty claims may not be credible. Shteir also talks about Rhode’s character as being one who views beauty in a way that lacks any sense of humor (Shteir para 21) and whom does not seem to get off campus much. (Shteir para 22) It is likely that the environment Rhode is exposed to affected and led to her peculiar perception of beauty.
In “The Anti-Beauty Myth”, Rhode seeks to extend civil rights law to include discrimination based on looks and supports her argument by denying the fact that a small number of these cases would not overwhelm the already overburdened legal system. (Rosen para 3)
However, Rosen questioned her argument by disputing that lookism may not be as prevalent if the number of cases were so small. (Rosen para 4)
In “The Anti-Beauty Myth”, Rosen believes Rhode is not credible because her arguments display hostility towards women whose political beliefs do not agree with her own. For example, she leaves out information of Michelle Obama and Gloria Steinem pursuing beauty but only brings it up for Sarah Palin, saying she pays her make up artist more than her foreign policy advisor. (Rosen para 5) Someone who leaves out information in order to strengthen their argument or weaken the opposing cannot be considered …show more content…
This implies that Rhodes does not believe in the use of makeup to boost one’s appearance. Rosen approves of grooming because it helps to compensate for the lack of natural beauty and acts as “a powerful sign of personal identity”. (Para 12) This is a clear indication that she disagrees with the feminist writers’ anti-beauty stance.
However, in “Taking Beauty’s Measure”, Shteir did not provide an elaborate definition of beauty like Rosen. Shteir merely questions the anti-beauty claims made by feminist writers and thus, derived her stand against these feminist writers based on the original rigid concept of beauty.
In both articles, the authors bring about valid arguments to support their stand, largely through the use of counter-claims and by investigating their credibility. However, Rosen’s elaborate definition of beauty expands the boundaries of it and is afforded more ways to state her argument than