The article has a whole section of the article based on stereotyping which just shows the reader how important this issue truly is in the field in general. “Offenders may feel threatened when the victim is a young black male, but not when the victim is a black female or an older black. A number of scholars have suggested that people are most likely to stereotype young black males as dangerous” (Anderson, 1990, Dunier, 1992, Gibbs, 1988, Lemelle, 1994 and Lyman, 1994). This, to me, is a major issue that is brought up quite a bit when discussing issues within the criminal justice in general as well as just with the way people live their lives. This is the most “popular” stereotype that I personally have seen in my life because I mostly have white friends and things that I have heard and seen push towards this major stereotype. Whether my friends realize it or not they were racially stereotyping our black classmates sometimes without even thinking about it. The “Adversary effects” portion of the article really intrigued me because it was not something that I thought about before this. “The code encourages young people in these communities to adopt an aggressive posture to avoid victimization and to respond with aggression when confronted. Even youth who are not otherwise prone to use violence follow the code of the streets. Their behavior is adaptive and tactical, a consequence of their spatial proximity to potentially dangerous adversaries.” (Felson, Painter-Davis 2012). The idea that young black men are raised to believe that they need to act as tough and aggressive as they can really shows the main issue that brings about this effect. The face to face confrontation really pushes the adversary effect to its full potential because it opens up both parties for a very physical and violent confrontation if both have been led to believe that they need to be act as aggressive and as “big” as possible. This all goes back to the
The article has a whole section of the article based on stereotyping which just shows the reader how important this issue truly is in the field in general. “Offenders may feel threatened when the victim is a young black male, but not when the victim is a black female or an older black. A number of scholars have suggested that people are most likely to stereotype young black males as dangerous” (Anderson, 1990, Dunier, 1992, Gibbs, 1988, Lemelle, 1994 and Lyman, 1994). This, to me, is a major issue that is brought up quite a bit when discussing issues within the criminal justice in general as well as just with the way people live their lives. This is the most “popular” stereotype that I personally have seen in my life because I mostly have white friends and things that I have heard and seen push towards this major stereotype. Whether my friends realize it or not they were racially stereotyping our black classmates sometimes without even thinking about it. The “Adversary effects” portion of the article really intrigued me because it was not something that I thought about before this. “The code encourages young people in these communities to adopt an aggressive posture to avoid victimization and to respond with aggression when confronted. Even youth who are not otherwise prone to use violence follow the code of the streets. Their behavior is adaptive and tactical, a consequence of their spatial proximity to potentially dangerous adversaries.” (Felson, Painter-Davis 2012). The idea that young black men are raised to believe that they need to act as tough and aggressive as they can really shows the main issue that brings about this effect. The face to face confrontation really pushes the adversary effect to its full potential because it opens up both parties for a very physical and violent confrontation if both have been led to believe that they need to be act as aggressive and as “big” as possible. This all goes back to the