However, I feel that the length detracted from my enjoyment of the article. I would not argue that this is a poor article; I actually think that it is written on a high academic standard, but I still did not enjoy it. I feel that the main reason for my dislike of this article is that I was assigned to read it. The article was very informationally dense and while not a negative attribute, I personally felt like it was a chore to finish reading the article. I can conclude that Bishop adequately communicated his topic and while a well written paper, I did not enjoy
However, I feel that the length detracted from my enjoyment of the article. I would not argue that this is a poor article; I actually think that it is written on a high academic standard, but I still did not enjoy it. I feel that the main reason for my dislike of this article is that I was assigned to read it. The article was very informationally dense and while not a negative attribute, I personally felt like it was a chore to finish reading the article. I can conclude that Bishop adequately communicated his topic and while a well written paper, I did not enjoy