Annotated Bibliography
1. Kopel, David B.(2013, Feb. 2) "The Great Gun Control War of the 20th Century." Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?
This article demonstrates history on gun control and how firearm has influenced individuals. The article has a good and bad reactions to many who believe and disbelieve in gun control. This source is credible since it indicates history/truths and is significant to my point since it has to do with gun control and how it sways individual’s outlook with this issue.
2. Olsen, Scott. "Guns and Gun Control." NY Times. Nytimes.com, 20 Feb. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. .
This article is an outline on past occasions and how the gun followers will be influenced. Therefore this demonstrates how a few individuals are turning out to be more one-sided against guns and how this can influence the gun control laws and how this eventually will influences evil doings. I feel this source to be dependable due to the numbers. This can be utilized on my paper to show how weapon control can influence crime and how the laws can influence the law abiding citizen. 3. Shoichet, Catherine E. "Bloomberg: Assault Weapons Ban Is Tough Sell." CNN. Cable News Network, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. . This article demonstrates the ideas of Mayor Bloomberg and how he wants to restrict firearms. This is a distinctive perspectives of how they can influence and impact the laws set up. This source is believable in light of the fact that it is a one on one meeting with Mr. Bloomberg and this is important to my point since it reveals Mr. Bloomberg's perspectives which can influence the laws. 4. Rogers, Alex. "Gun Owners Trust the NRA but Agree with Obama." Swampland Gun Owners Trust the NRA but Agree with Obama Comments. Swampland.time.com, 8 Feb. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. . This article depicts how individuals in America are concerned with firearm laws and are agreeing with President Obama's perspectives, individuals are turning out to be accepting to weapon control measures and how this can influence our society today. This source is perfect since it demonstrates perceptions and is important to my point of view that gun control being set up has its positive and negative impacts on everyone. 5. …show more content…
Buchanan, Wyatt. "State Lawmakers Propose Tough Gun Laws." SFGate. SF Gate, 7 Feb. 2013. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. . This is mostly about firearm laws which were proposed in California. This sources opinions are not for or against these laws, however portrays the real laws. Therefore, the source is exceptionally objective, fair, and professionally composed. This source is to a great degree dependable and an important piece of my paper. 6. …show more content…
Kellerman, Arthur L., and Frederick P. Rivara. (2013 Feb., 13)"Silencing the Silence on Gun Research.".
This article examines the purposes of firearm control and how the late shootings have not restricted weapons. This source is dependable it gives realities and foundation on how gun laws can influence society. This source is significant to my paper since it is about the firearm control and how it influences everyone in the country.
7. 2010 - McDonald v Chicago 561 US 3025 (201), Handgun bans are unconstitutional. Further solidifies ruling in Heller. Individual's right to keep and bear arms protected by the 2nd Amendment.
8. 2008 - District of Columbia v Heller 554 U.S. 570 (2008). 2nd Amendment does protect the individual right to keep and bear arms. Bans on certain types of guns are ruled unconstitutional. This is a huge decision, as it reverses course from previous rhetoric present in Miller and Cruikshank which interpreted the amendment in terms of militia, or organized groups and instead acknowledges that individuals are protected regardless of the existence of a militia.* 9. 1939 - United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) The Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act, stating that sawed off shotguns, and other types of firearms, are unrelated to a well organized militia and are not subject to 2nd Amendment protection. The prevailing thought as a result of Miller is that the individual, separate from a militia, is not subject to 2nd Amendment protection. Unanimous opinion by Justice James McReynolds. 10. 1875 - United States v Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (1875). (Westlaw: 92 U.S. 542, 2 Otto 542, 1875 WL 17550 (U.S.La.), 23 L.Ed. 588. A group
1. Kopel, David B.(2013, Feb. 2) "The Great Gun Control War of the 20th Century." Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?
This article demonstrates history on gun control and how firearm has influenced individuals. The article has a good and bad reactions to many who believe and disbelieve in gun control. This source is credible since it indicates history/truths and is significant to my point since it has to do with gun control and how it sways individual’s outlook with this issue.
2. Olsen, Scott. "Guns and Gun Control." NY Times. Nytimes.com, 20 Feb. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. .
This article is an outline on past occasions and how the gun followers will be influenced. Therefore this demonstrates how a few individuals are turning out to be more one-sided against guns and how this can influence the gun control laws and how this eventually will influences evil doings. I feel this source to be dependable due to the numbers. This can be utilized on my paper to show how weapon control can influence crime and how the laws can influence the law abiding citizen. 3. Shoichet, Catherine E. "Bloomberg: Assault Weapons Ban Is Tough Sell." CNN. Cable News Network, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. . This article demonstrates the ideas of Mayor Bloomberg and how he wants to restrict firearms. This is a distinctive perspectives of how they can influence and impact the laws set up. This source is believable in light of the fact that it is a one on one meeting with Mr. Bloomberg and this is important to my point since it reveals Mr. Bloomberg's perspectives which can influence the laws. 4. Rogers, Alex. "Gun Owners Trust the NRA but Agree with Obama." Swampland Gun Owners Trust the NRA but Agree with Obama Comments. Swampland.time.com, 8 Feb. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2013. . This article depicts how individuals in America are concerned with firearm laws and are agreeing with President Obama's perspectives, individuals are turning out to be accepting to weapon control measures and how this can influence our society today. This source is perfect since it demonstrates perceptions and is important to my point of view that gun control being set up has its positive and negative impacts on everyone. 5. …show more content…
Buchanan, Wyatt. "State Lawmakers Propose Tough Gun Laws." SFGate. SF Gate, 7 Feb. 2013. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. . This is mostly about firearm laws which were proposed in California. This sources opinions are not for or against these laws, however portrays the real laws. Therefore, the source is exceptionally objective, fair, and professionally composed. This source is to a great degree dependable and an important piece of my paper. 6. …show more content…
Kellerman, Arthur L., and Frederick P. Rivara. (2013 Feb., 13)"Silencing the Silence on Gun Research.".
This article examines the purposes of firearm control and how the late shootings have not restricted weapons. This source is dependable it gives realities and foundation on how gun laws can influence society. This source is significant to my paper since it is about the firearm control and how it influences everyone in the country.
7. 2010 - McDonald v Chicago 561 US 3025 (201), Handgun bans are unconstitutional. Further solidifies ruling in Heller. Individual's right to keep and bear arms protected by the 2nd Amendment.
8. 2008 - District of Columbia v Heller 554 U.S. 570 (2008). 2nd Amendment does protect the individual right to keep and bear arms. Bans on certain types of guns are ruled unconstitutional. This is a huge decision, as it reverses course from previous rhetoric present in Miller and Cruikshank which interpreted the amendment in terms of militia, or organized groups and instead acknowledges that individuals are protected regardless of the existence of a militia.* 9. 1939 - United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) The Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act, stating that sawed off shotguns, and other types of firearms, are unrelated to a well organized militia and are not subject to 2nd Amendment protection. The prevailing thought as a result of Miller is that the individual, separate from a militia, is not subject to 2nd Amendment protection. Unanimous opinion by Justice James McReynolds. 10. 1875 - United States v Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (1875). (Westlaw: 92 U.S. 542, 2 Otto 542, 1875 WL 17550 (U.S.La.), 23 L.Ed. 588. A group