She spent much of her time under medical supervision and searching for a cure, even having her jugular veins opened at one point. Anne was treated by many great doctors but none of the medicines had any impact on her. Anne died at the age of 47 on February 18, 1679 in London, England. The stories of the sufferings and corruption of Quaker ladies in English penitentiaries moved the weak, disable Conway to action. During her last years, she persistently advocated for the Quakers, who were abused and denied for their position against social traditions. Conway’s commitment to her new “family” even stretched out to the point of asking her husband to intervene for their benefit. While willing to help his wife, Lord Conway remained hostile toward the Quakers. Conway’s openness to the Quakers and dismissal of her formal mentor’s perspectives are noteworthy for a few reasons. To start with, she surveyed the legitimacy of Quaker religiosity in view of her own perceptions of and engagements with them rather than on the public and negative images maintained by More. With such independent thinking, Conway subsequently expected, or made a signal toward, a critical philosophical interpretive procedure, what later religious feminists would identify as a hermeneutic of
She spent much of her time under medical supervision and searching for a cure, even having her jugular veins opened at one point. Anne was treated by many great doctors but none of the medicines had any impact on her. Anne died at the age of 47 on February 18, 1679 in London, England. The stories of the sufferings and corruption of Quaker ladies in English penitentiaries moved the weak, disable Conway to action. During her last years, she persistently advocated for the Quakers, who were abused and denied for their position against social traditions. Conway’s commitment to her new “family” even stretched out to the point of asking her husband to intervene for their benefit. While willing to help his wife, Lord Conway remained hostile toward the Quakers. Conway’s openness to the Quakers and dismissal of her formal mentor’s perspectives are noteworthy for a few reasons. To start with, she surveyed the legitimacy of Quaker religiosity in view of her own perceptions of and engagements with them rather than on the public and negative images maintained by More. With such independent thinking, Conway subsequently expected, or made a signal toward, a critical philosophical interpretive procedure, what later religious feminists would identify as a hermeneutic of