Hayleigh Hamrick-Sharp Mrs. Haver English 12 October 27, 2017 Should Animal Testing Continue or End: Most people do not know what goes on behind the scenes of the beauty industry. How do people think they determine whether a product is safe for a human or not? Animal testing is the most used method of testing products. There are many things people don't know about the method and there are many people against it.…
Since most of the data collected from animals are false, they cannot be used. When companies do decide to use the results from the animal testing they could often lead to an enormous failure. One such example is Vioxx, a drug that was supposed to treat arthritis (joint inflammation). The company, Merck & Co, have tested it on monkeys, one of the closest animals to humans, and five other species,and all the testing shown that the drug was same for humans. But when sold on the market, it was almost estimated to cause 500,000 heart attacks and stroke and 140,000 deaths worldwide.…
Picture this, you’ve just came home from the mall and you’re going to try on that brand new moisturizer, cosmetic or vitamin supplement. Then suddenly, your skin begins to flare up with inflammation, your tongue itches or you begin to have strange pains. Yet, according to the bottle, these are just minor side effects. Imagine what bigger side effects people had to face during human trials to perfect that product. Or worst, what animal had to suffer the consequences in order to ensure the safety of that human product.…
Oliveira 1 Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, alternate testing methods are available, and because humans and animals are every different from each other making animals very poor test subjects. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC (Animal Testing Pro & Con). Scientist use animals for many different purposes. Animals are used to test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs before those drugs are given to people to treat illness and disease. Animals can also be used as test subjects for products like lipstick, eyeshadow, contact lens solution, and shampoo (Hayhurst, 26).…
However, it is arguable that animal testing has benefited all living species as a whole. Serena Holloway, the author of “Controversy: Animal testing” writes “Animal research has helped produced vaccines for rabies, tetanus, parvo virus, and a multitude of other illnesses in cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals. It can be argued that animal research has improved the health of all living species.” Animal testing has also led to prevent extinction for species “ including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil.” (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?)…
The debate surrounding the use of invasive animal research has been ongoing throughout history. Proponents of the practice are quick to point out the multitude of benefits that have emerged from the practice such as the cures and vaccines to major diseases such as polio, and their capacity to continue to do so in the future. Opponents often claim that the moral status of these animals deem it morally impermissible to do any time of research that can harm them, no matter what the benefits for humans may be. This is especially true in the argument against invasive chimpanzee research. Chimps share similar genetics with humans and have been shown to exhibit an array of emotional responses similar to those of humans, but this does not necessarily…
There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women.…
Another alternative to animal testing is of course, human testing. This alternative however, is not wildly used since animals can be acquired faster and are disposable unlike a person. The animals are also easier to handle, being most of the animals used for testing are rats and mice. Unfortunately, most animals are kept in captivity and are killed as soon as the test is done. Human testing would also give more efficient result since the test is used directly on a person rather than an animal.…
Animal testing is no longer effective in today’s society. Testing has no purpose, it has been said many a time that it is useless and unnecessary. There is a higher chance of flipping a coin and being accurate in a test than actually doing the research and testing on animals. To see if a new product is safe it goes through a whole process where animals are being mistreated for the benefits of humans. Animals in experiments today are bred for the sole purpose of the particular experiment, so once the experiment ends, the animals have no value, and end up getting euthanized, because they are useless to scientists.…
Animal Testing for Medical Research Animal testing for medical research is conducted all throughout the world. It helps scientists discover new drugs, vaccinations, and cures for a multitude of diseases. These diseases included, lung cancer, heart disease, strokes, HIV/AIDS, diabetes, hepatitis C, Parkinson’s disease and several others. (Americans for Medical Process) However, discovering these drugs and cures did not transpire without a cost. While these revelations may have saved thousands of human lives, they have ended thousands and millions of animal lives, and even lives’ of humans.…
When animals are used in medical research, it is great way to uncover the mysteries and find treatments or even cures for various diseases. For example, in Shany Sun’s Young Scientists Journal article, “The Truth Behind Animal Testing,” the author says, “…medical advancements that have been discovered through animal testing include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin (that controls blood sugar levels of diabetics), kidney transplants, and vaccines for polio and meningitis” (Sun 1). This example shows just how beneficial animal testing in medical research can be. These medical advancements would not have been available for years if animal testing had not…
considering they were “God’s creation” as some will say (Monamy 10). On the contrary, British Lord Chancellor Francis Bacon thought that animal testing is an excellent way to learn more about our bodies and how it works (Monamy 10). However, this controversy made animal testing rise. An additional amount of scientists started using different types of animals such as monkeys, rats, birds, dogs, cats, and the list goes on and on. With animal testing in use, scientist found out how the digestive, respiratory, nervous, muscular, etc.…
Firstly, the usage of animal testing has led to many useful medications. This is showed quite well in Source A, a timeline of many medical accomplishments achieved through animal testing. For instance, insulin to aid those with diabetes. Before the creation of insulin, type one diabetes was considered a death sentence.…
Animal testing is the use of animals in order to determine the safety of a newly invented product, mainly medicine, drug and cosmetics. Animals are the perfect models to test on since they are similar to humans in some ways and to a certain degree, they can predict the potential effects of a product. However, during the process of testing, animals are brutally neglected and are treated with almost no care. Such practices are inhumane; thus, in 1959 Russell and Burch published The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, which introduced the idea of the 3Rs principle — replacement, reduction, and refinement. This idea highlights the treatment that animals should receive in an experimental setting, and gradually it promoted the development…
Well the fact is that whether we use animals or not, there will always be a first person to test a new drug. The FDA has noted that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. Out of that 8% that pass the human trial, half of them will need to be re- labeled because of side effects that showed in the human test, but not the animal. III. There was a paper published in the British medical Journal titled " Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?"…