Animal Rights In Animal Liberation By Peter Singer

Improved Essays
Animal testing is a highly controversial topic with a multitude of opinions of both sides. It’s an industry where there are entire companies dedicated to the breeding of animals used for experimental purposes. It allows companies to order all types of animals, from beagles to mice, to be sent to their laboratory and tested on. Animal experiments are often used to develop new medicine and to test the safety of all kinds of products. Many of these experiments cause pain to the animals involved and drastically reduce their quality of life. In his book, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer states that the basic principle of equality requires equal consideration. The question we should be asking regarding animals rights is not “what can animals do for …show more content…
Animals do not contract many of the diseases that humans do, such as heart disease, cancers, HIV, Parkinson 's disease or schizophrenia. The diseases are instead injected into the animals artificially in laboratories to mimic the human disease. These experiments belittle the complexity of human conditions which are affected by a wide-variety of different variables such as genetics, psychological issues, and personal experiences. Often, treatments that appear promising in animals do not work on humans. Not only are time, money and innocent lives are being wasted, but effective treatments are being discarded and harmful treatments are being approved and distributed to humans. Support of animal testing is largely based on anecdote without any support to prove it effective. Scientists have been studying conditions like cancer and AIDS in animals for years, but have yet to find a reliable and totally effective …show more content…
This, however, is far from true. It is a common misconception that 85% of mice cells match human DNA, but in a recent analysis of over 100 mouse cells showed that only 50% of DNA responsible for regulating genes was matched with human DNA. That means every time any type of medicine, cosmetic product or any other product tested on mice that appears to be safe only has a 50% chance of being safe for humans. Cynomolgus macaque monkeys, the most commonly used species of monkeys used to test drug safety, are resistant to doses of acetaminophen that would be deadly to humans. Aspirin is toxic to many animals, including cats, mice and rats, and would not be on pharmacy shelves if it had been tested following the current animal testing standards. A drug used to treat arthritis, Vioxx, was found safe in six animals including monkeys, but has caused about 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and nearly 140,000 deaths

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 2008, a video was released by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) that showed severe animal cruelty at Mowmar Farms Hog Confinement, located just outside of Fairmont, Minnesota (Genoways). The video showed employees prodding hogs too crippled to stand with electric prods and beating hogs repeatedly on their backs with metal gate rods (Genoways). Adding to this, the video also revealed the method the workers used to euthanize underweight piglets: a technique called thumping (Genoways). Thumping involves workers taking the piglets by their hind legs and smashing their skulls against the concrete floor. Their bodies would then be put in large bins, where they would be left to die (Genoways).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to Peter Singer on Animal Rights and Consciousness Long has the world and its popular philosophy considered animals to be mere things, mere living objects; lacking essential consciences, devoid of personhood. Humanity, however, has changed and is continuing to change, drastically. Knowledge is rapidly increasing, culture extensively expanding, and philosophy dramatically changing; thus, the personhood and, by extension, rights of animals is subsequently being reexamined. A leader, if not the leader of this reexamination is the philosopher, Peter Singer, who’s life journey lead him to believe that animals deserve equal consideration with humans, and greater rights than what they currently possess. Like Singer I feel animals should…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as any other living thing. Moral equality is distinct from factual equality. Singer states, "Otherwise it would be nonsense to talk to the equality of human…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case that animal suffering should be given equal consideration to that of human suffering is a claim Peter Singer makes and that I disagree with, instead arguing that human suffering should be more highly considered to that of animals. Exposition- 310 words Peter Singer in his argument claims that human suffering and animal suffering should be treated in the same manner, putting the lives of other animals in the same categories as those of humans. This argument begins by talking about how humans should be considered in the same group as animals, this is all due by part that we are all members of the animal kingdom, living in the same world, breathing the same air, and occupying the same space. The rights should be universally equal amongst all species.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yo bro, we’re learning about this crazy argument in my philosophy class, it is about animal equality. In, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer argues that we should extend the same rights and equality of human beings to non humans; animals. He does not make this claim meaning animals are equal in abilities, opportunities, or their logic towards life. Also, if he achieves his claim he does not agree to have equal rights towards animals. Peter Singer argues for equal consideration.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, “Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease"(Cruelty-Free International Organisation). Experimenters are attempting to mirror human diseases by artificially creating symptoms in different species of animals, resulting in extremely inaccurate test results. Not only will it affect future test results, but it will also be dangerous for those who use the products. In addition, based on U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, nine out of ten experimental drugs are unsuccessful in clinical studies because experimenters cannot precisely predict how tests on animal species will perform in people, according to laboratory and animal studies.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other than examples of failures resulting from animal testing, there are other reasons doctors and scientists believe it is not effective. One of which being animals and humans have different genetic makeup. This means, because of the different DNA structures, some diseases are difficult to induce in animals since it does not naturally…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The rights of animals are something that we must consider and carefully analyze. Many animal rights activists are fighting to protect animals from certain experiments that can cause the animals harm, and even death. They state that animals have the “right” to be free from these kinds of tests. If something can feel pain, then that something has the right to equal consideration. Animals can feel pain and pleasure, as stated by Singer in “All Animals Have Rights”.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Singer’s main argument may seem to be more about rights of animals compared to humans, the argument could be transferred to just about any living thing. In Animal liberation, Singer states that “the extension of the basic principle of equality from one group to another does not imply that we must treat both groups in exactly the same way.” This shows that Singer is saying that we should all have equal rights, whether its an animal, woman, man race, etc. but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it should be the same exact rights. For example, singer talks about humans voting, it is understandable for a man to vote but if one should give a dog the right to vote, it wouldn’t make any sense and would be meaningless.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Singer acknowledges the fact that there are differences between humans and non-human animals, he argues that these differences should not exclude animals from equal consideration. In fact, the principle of equality should be extended to animals. As a principle, equality implies “that our concern for others ought not to depend on what they are like, or what abilities they possess – what this concern requires us to do may vary according to the characteristics of those affected by what we do” (Singer, 1974, 4). In other words, while the principle of equality should be extended to non-human animals, differences between humans and non-human animals may lead to different rights. However, despite the fact that animals are different, what solidifies non-human animals place in equal consideration, according to Singer, is having the capacity to suffer.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of animals are put through unavailing animal tests each year, and most of them suffer abuse that is senseless because most tests are inaccurate. Peggy Carlson, an animal rights activist and head of the humane society argues “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans” (161). In other words animals are being used and abused in tests that are not even projecting similar results as they would if humans were to do the test. Scientists say animals are used in testing because they are similar to humans in many ways. The truth is, they are similar to humans in many ways, but we are not exactly identical and also have many differences that affect test results.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays