Many people claim that animals are the closest thing that we can get to exact replicas of humans. But actually that is not true because there are other things that are proven to be more …show more content…
However this is incorrect because there are many more alternatives that have proved to be more accurate than animal testing. According to, ¨ Alternatives in Testing,¨ ¨in comparison studies, EpiDerm correctly detected all of the test chemicals that irritate human skin, while tests on rabbits misclassified 10 out of 25 test chemicals—a full 40% error rate.¨ EpiDerm is a 3D ready-to-use tissue consisting of the same predominant cells as humans. This evidence just states one of the many times where alternatives were more accurate than actual animal …show more content…
Nevertheless this is incorrect because there are many forms of research that are more cost and time efficient than animal testing. For example, “The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the cost” (“ Alternatives in Testing”). This evidence clearly proves that there are better alternatives that are proven to be more cost and time