Pain Of Animal Testing

Amazing Essays
The True Pain Of Safety

Over many continents and through many time periods animal testing has had a strong presence in science. Many places and companies today have discontinued the use of animals due to its, at times, extremely inhumane practice. Though without the use of animals, many important discoveries, procedures, and vaccines wouldn’t have been found. Animal testing, though some has been found to be cruel, is a helpful tool for future discoveries, and should be continued today because of the usefulness in researching for the safety of humankind.
According to Dictionary.com animal testing is, testing using a nonhuman subject for the safety sake of humans (The definition). This practices has been used for centuries. They have
…show more content…
Making tests for skin irritation or eye irritation where rabbits have a substance applied to their eye or skin so the effects can be documented (cosmetics) unnecessary. These tests include, “cornea-like 3D tissue structures produced from human cells. Likewise, human skin cultures can be grown and purchased” (@peta. “testing). Many people say that these test can be more accurate due to the fact that it uses actual human cells. While the tests mentioned are good substitutes for the tests that previously used animals they still don’t make up for the need to test products on a living body …show more content…
In article number four it state,”Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else”(Avalon). While in some cases an animal is harmed no other person is injured in the process. This isn’t suggesting that it is okay to harm animals for no reason, but for the sake of science and keeping others safe it may be okay. Within article fourteen it is said that every person has a right to personal or representative decision as to how they publicly contribute (Avalon). Unless the state or country prohibits the act of testing on animals then it becomes a personal decision. There are plenty of brands that do not test their products on animals, but in the end it is up to the consumer what products they buy. Just as it is up to the companies how much testing they think their products need.
Animal testing has made many breakthroughs in science. Including new vaccines, treatments, and overall just ensuring the safety of a product before it is set out for the public. At times the test may not have been able to predict all the possible outcomes of a product or medicine, but not all tests are full proof. People and animals benefit from some of the testing done. We should continue to use animals in testing new products, but we should only use them for test that don’t have a better alternative. Until the day where other types of tests

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who support animal rights are taking their mission very seriously to educate citizens worldwide on how many large scale brands test on animals. What many people do not know is that just because businesses discontinued or did not do animal testing in the past does not mean that they have continued the cruel behavior since. To be fully certain that companies do not test their products on animals, consumers who claim that they do not support animal testing can research and educate themselves on companies’ involved in these large scale…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville). Also, plenty of these companies that test on animals claim to do it because there are requirement laws for it in other countries that they sell to (“About Cosmetic Testing”); if this is the case then these companies shouldn 't sell to those countries till new laws are passed. So on, there is no necessity to use animals for cosmetics testing, making it unethical and cruel to the animals. There should be more laws on testing on animals in the basis of cosmetics, but separate from…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal research has made it so through a trial and error process products can be used as a part of the public without this process these items could never be considered perfectly alright to use. Animal testing has been a useful bit of society by checking the safety of procedures and it is a legal and morally correct strategy for testing. Although the core of this claim is valid, it has a mistake in its logic as in the idea where it concentrates on the lives and well being of people in general yet has no thought for the lives of the animals being tested on. Animal testing is an advantage to people, yet this advantage comes with a downside, in place for the positives the animals need to suffer an incredible negative, they suffer consistent animal cruelty that may even lead to death. The moral thoughts of many people would conflict with the testing on animals because delivering agony on another animal is unethical.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groups such as PETA have taken a stand against animal testing with the use of violence, while groups like the Humane Society reject animal research in a more peaceful manner. Today, the government relies on animal testing for the drugs and vaccines used on humans, and “to meet US and EU regulations, medicines must be successfully treated in two species of animals before moving to human clinical trials” (Experimenting). Europe and the United States trust the results of animal testing enough to make it mandatory for all vaccines. The two governments use animals as a precaution to lessen the number of human illnesses and fatalities during human clinical trials, which saves time and resources for the medical world and the consumers. The medical industry recognizes the benefits of animal research by “rewarding about two-thirds of the Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine to researchers who made medical advancements through the use of animal experimentation” (Hile 72).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Experimentation Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most people agree that animal experimentation should be banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome would be. Although, there are other ways of getting results without testing on animals which are, human tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc. Other people think animal testing is the best way because some animals have an organism as a human like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc. Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely match with a human body reaction towards the outcome of the research from an animal.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people believe that Animal experimentation has played a huge role in enabling people to discover, prevent and cure diseases. Many diseases were found and there were numerous advantageous results from the experiments. However, there is a problem with this reasoning because the drugs or medicine that are invented by animal experimentation can respond differently in humans. According to the statistics, 92 percent of all drugs that were guaranteed safe to be used for humans and that were effective in animals, failed in human bodies because they were dangerous and did not really work. ( Food and Drug Administration) Penicillin is a antibiotic agent which is commonly used in the treatment of bacterial infection.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cosmetic Animal Testing

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consumers can buy from many big-name brands like Kat Von D, Jefree Star, and e.l.f. that do not test on animals. They can do this because the cosmetic industry has a large foundation of ingredients safe for human use from the tests conducted in previous years or simply because the company is vegan. This is can also be avoided by other companies that do test on animals because there are alternative methods. One method can be human conducted tests that would theoretically work better than animal tests.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used for medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Rights When it comes to the topic of animal rights, most of us will readily agree that animal testing should be abolished. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question whether there are alternative replacements which are proven successful. Whereas some are convinced that animals shouldn’t be used because they’re very different from human beings and the results are not accurate. In my view, I agree that we should eliminate animal testing because the results may be successful on animals but can cause death in humans. However, I can see why many are for animal testing because there have been several case studies where drugs were medically accurate for human consumption.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A scientist may be unaware of and may not realize when an animal is undergoing severe pain and/or distress (Rowan). Along with the suffering that the animals must undergo, most animals are either euthanized after the experiment or die of intentional causes during the experiment. There is always the constant fear that effects brought on by the researchers themselves, could kill the animal before the actual experiment does (Rowan). People to this day believe that animal testing is exceptionally justifiable because humans are superior to animals and therefore should not have the same rights as humans do, for this reason it is considered acceptable to experiment on them (Hajar). Animal testing advocates will consistently state that animal experiments are highly “regulated” and follow the laws that are in place to protect animals from wrongful mistreatment.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays