Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay

Animal Testing is a very big controversy on if it should be happening or it should not be happening. There are many pros and cons to either side. One side is saying that animal testing is bad and should not be happening. To certain animals that is human beings love and do not want this to happen too. The other side says it is good for our human race and should be happening to the animals because it helps us live longer as a race. For many it is just a moral issue to the topic and many people are trying to stop it. “A 2011 poll of nearly 1,000 biomedical scientists conducted by the science journal Nature found that more than 90% agreed that the use of animals in research is essential" (ProCon). Animal testing can help us live longer and helps …show more content…
Many tests can be used on volunteers and it helps even more than animal testing because it is on an actual human being. Us as human beings will never stop testing. There will never be a perfect cure for everyone. We need testing and the way we do it can be changed through all of our technology. Another way to test on humans is the death penalty for people in jail. In my opinion, people sentenced to life in jail without parole should be tested on. The severity of the drug or test on the patient could be endless when tested on patients that have the death penalty. These drugs are a form of torture and some people in jail deserve to get the death penalty. Some cases the death penalty needs to be more severe and this could be the option for some of the cases out there. The only problem with practicing on people who have the death penalty most likely the inmates will not cooperate and not tell fully what they are feeling if they are being tested. There could be some connection on people who have the death penalty and on saving lives of millions if they test on them and find a cure. If they do start to test on people who are on death row, depending on how brutal the test is, it could lead to lower criminal