Animal Testing Vs Human Life

Better Essays
Is Animal Life worth more than Human Life?
Did you know that if it wasn’t for animal testing we wouldn’t be able to vaccinate ourselves against rabies, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, tuberculosis, and many more? Animal testing is experiment done on animals for the betterment of products from medications to cosmetics. The pros of animal testing is that there is no other way to test on an living, whole body system, and there are laws protecting animals and their rights. The cons of animal testing is that it is inhumane and cruel and there are alternative ways to test products. I favor animal testing because it has a great contribution to life saving cures/ treatments, animals are similar to human beings in many ways, and it 's safer to test
…show more content…
Animal testing has created so many cures for diseases such as Diphtheria, treatment for diabetes, tuberculosis, developing vaccine for polio. Animal testing is needed to improve the quality of human life. Human life is much more valuable than animals life. According to “Animal Testing: Lifesaving Research VS. Animal Welfare, “During the animal testing phase of a research project, scientists look to answer questions.How does this chemical affect skin? How does it affect organs, such as the liver, heart, or stomach? How does it affect behavior?” (Sepahban 13). Whenever scientists are trying to make a new type of medicine all of these things matter and need to looked into carefully. Animals provide us with the results of these questions. How would be be able to know the effect of a behavior if scientists were doing alternative testing? It 's not just about the results it 's about the emotions and how animals react to it. Not testing on animals before can be very dangerous to human health. In 1930s more than 100 people died because they were exposed to elixir sulfanilamide. It was a popular treatment for sore throats. In Animal Testing: Lifesaving Research VS. Animal Welfare the author stated that, “What watkins did not know was that the chemical he used to dissolve the sulfinamide, diethylene glycol, was poisonous. He hadn 't tes ted it on animals before selling it. Not testing on animals caused 100 people to die. Not only does animal testing creates cures and save lives but animals are very similar to human beings in many

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville). Also, plenty of these companies that test on animals claim to do it because there are requirement laws for it in other countries that they sell to (“About Cosmetic Testing”); if this is the case then these companies shouldn 't sell to those countries till new laws are passed. So on, there is no necessity to use animals for cosmetics testing, making it unethical and cruel to the animals. There should be more laws on testing on animals in the basis of cosmetics, but separate from…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groups such as PETA have taken a stand against animal testing with the use of violence, while groups like the Humane Society reject animal research in a more peaceful manner. Today, the government relies on animal testing for the drugs and vaccines used on humans, and “to meet US and EU regulations, medicines must be successfully treated in two species of animals before moving to human clinical trials” (Experimenting). Europe and the United States trust the results of animal testing enough to make it mandatory for all vaccines. The two governments use animals as a precaution to lessen the number of human illnesses and fatalities during human clinical trials, which saves time and resources for the medical world and the consumers. The medical industry recognizes the benefits of animal research by “rewarding about two-thirds of the Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine to researchers who made medical advancements through the use of animal experimentation” (Hile 72).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The LD50 test and the Drazie test is cruel and inhumane. These tests are extremely painful to the animal and death is the final result. There are different alternatives to animal testing, but still continue to use animals as test subjects. Some of the alternatives are computer modeling, and in-vitro testing. On the other hand, animal testing can help save lives and find different cures for humans.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That's how you'd want it, because new drugs are dangerous, and while we don't want animals to suffer it's preferable to accidentally killing humans with untested chemicals. Animalresearch.info has a list of all the diseases for which we now have treatments thanks, in part, to animal testing: from Aids to whooping cough, the safety of new treatments was first assessed through testing them on animals (Chivers,…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Testing Argument Essay When women put on their makeup, they often do not realize that in most cases, the assurance of that product’s safety comes at the price of an animal’s life. Many big beauty or medical brands test on living animals to determined whether or not the products are considered to be safe for human use. Many people think it is necessary to test these potentially harmful substances on animals in order to assure product safety. However, recent research has shown that there are more cost effective and reliable alternative methods from pro-animal testing businesses to use to better ensure safety of both animals and humans. Many organizations, like PETA for example, have been working to educate society and put a stop to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Advanced computer systems, mathematical models (yourgenome.org, 2015) as well as tests using human tissues and cells can be used to test new treatments and drugs (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016). These methods, as well as the use of human volunteers, will allow tests to be more cost-effective, environmentally friendly and efficient (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016) (New England Anti-Vivisection Society, 2016). Animal tests are also generally inapplicable to humans (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016) due to variation in anatomy and biochemistry between species (New England Anti-Vivisection Society, 2016). Another argument against animal testing is that the experiments performed on the animals are generally cruel and the animals are often killed after the experiment (yourgenome.org, 2015). This poses the question whether or not is in unethical to use animals as test subjects; even if the experiments lead to important scientific…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Facts

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This fact is telling us, 75% of the time a side effect in the human discovers was never detected in the animal test. The side effects could range from simple itchiness to serious side effects like, organs shutting down or not working correctly. “A study has shown eighty eight percent of stillbirths are caused by drugs which passed animal tests” (“Reasons Why Animal Testing Is Pointless”). “The Hepatitis B drug killed five of seven people who were diagnosed with liver damage because the drug had been tested on animals first” (“Cruelty Free International”). Both these facts show how inaccurate test results can harm our well being.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Importance Of Animal Testing

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Animals, like human, also have rights to be freed from suffering and treated well. We, as human beings, must understand that animals are also living beings which feelings should be considered as well. So, is animal testing still appropriate to be used in drug industry? I do not think so. It is inappropriate because most of the testing implemented hurts the animals both physically and mentally, it generates a lot of social problem, and its results are often inaccurate.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vivisection And Brutality

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Vivisection: Necessity or Brutality? Introduction/Explanation of Issues From the ancient times of the Greek and Romans to modern society, experimenting on living organisms is a concept yet to be outdated. Rather than testing on people, animals have become the primary subjects who endeavor rigorous scientific experimenting; ultimately because it is inhumane to test on a person with such serve trials. Vivisectionists, scientists who conduct experimental trials on living creatures, defend their professions with medical breakthroughs that have saved nearly all of the human race. There are two main motives for experimenting animals: firstly, to analyze more information about the animal, and, secondly, to determine whether the substance at question…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays