Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Animal testing is cruel and unreasonable! Animals are a total different species, than humans.(6 Major Pros and cons of animal research) What may work for humans, may cause animals ' problems or even in some cases, death.(Animal testing cons what every person should know.) Not only is testing on animals risky, its cost is dramatically higher! No one understands the abundant amount of money that goes into these researches. The bad thing is that the amount of money being used on testing these poor innocent animals could be put toward new technology. The new technology could save animals and human lives. Today there are many new types of tests. These tests could be more beneficial to new medications and cosmetics.
Animals should not have to be put on the spot to save humans. Animals are capable of feeling and enduring as much pain as humans do! Why make them suffer for research that may not even work? However, most of the time animal testing is considered a waste of
…show more content…
Most research or testing styles are way too much for animals. They usually end up causing the animal its life. Animals shouldn’t be treated like that! Animals are living creatures just as the entire human population! People go to school nowadays to find cures for all sorts of diseases. People also find new ways to do testing, testing that does not have anything to do with the use or harm of animals. There is so much new testing out there that is more efficient.(Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?) The new testing has also been saving the government tons of money.
Some of the new testing has gone as far as using human cells. By using human cells, scientists are able to see how certain types of medications react with the human body, not an animal’s body.(Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?) Animals’ bodies are different than human bodies, at least when it comes to reactions due to certain medications. Which is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Dbq

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animals can feel pain, have the ability to learn new things, and can have different emotions. This is why animal testing is not okay. Animal experimentation is unnecessary, inhumane, and not accurate. Many different types of animals are used in a variety of experiments and tests.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is also a lot more expensive and non-practical than alternative methods. (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical testing on animals help us gain more knowledge about different chemicals and medicines, but can be harmful to the animals, making it inhumane. On the other side, our knowledge…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With so many other options available animals should not be used or hurt in experiments. Looking at the results of animal testing clearly shows that animals are poor test subjects because of the lack of comparison between them and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing, although defective, has proven to be beneficial. Animal testing has contributed to medical science in a number of ways. Because of the complexity of the human body, scientists will argue that it is necessary to perform research on living animals. However, because humans and other animals vary significantly, these tests may not always produce accurate results. Although there are alternatives to animal testing, eliminating the usage of animals will slow the progress of medical advancement.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals all around the world are used for testing and research. People always wonder why people use animals. They ask why would scientist put these innocent creatures through something horrible. It has been proven that scientist use about 100 million animals for testing and research each year. From personal research, I have seen many inhumane things happen to these creatures that should not happen.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The testing on animals is a very touchy subject. It makes people wonder whether or not its cruel to advance technology by killing innocent animals. Killing animals for testing has its benefits but it's still inhumane to do that to animals. It can destroy populations of animals if tested often and if every lab has its own supply of animals the populations will drop by extreme numbers. The animals that are tested on often get terrible treatment as the people testing on them know they will soon die.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Animal Testing Worth

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are still too many people who do not see the problem with animal testing. Although it is very beneficial to humans, it is expensive and a practice of animal cruelty. It is cruel and inhumane to test on animals and taking their lives. For the sake of society, the number of animals being must decrease.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. First of all, there is a huge lack of respect in the industry. According to Dunnuck: "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. . . .This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment."…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing could cause millions of scientific breakthroughs, and until we find another test subject to perform on, we should continue testing on animals. Brains overweighs emotion.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing has been a part of our society since the early 1900s. And it appears to me, that not until around 40 years ago or so, people began to realize that testing animals was inhumane on many different levels. But because we are the human beings that we are, we still try to shy away from a lot of the negative consequences of animal testing. It is easier for us to push aside that which is bad and try only to look at the positive aspects. Yet, in my opinion, the cons outweigh the pros.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Peta, People for the ethical treatment of animals, “Each year, more than 100 million animals including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. Considering the list of animals above, most of these are considered common household pets. How are household pets beneficial to medical research? Most of the 100 million animals being tested are not being treated humanely. Today, animals are being mistreated for human purposes this mistreatment include “infecting with disease, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage…”…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are deeply injured and suffer from diseases, infections and tons of pain from these tests. Specifically, different types of harmful tests practiced on animals are such as, “Examples of animal tests include forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs pesticides, and dripping corrosive chemicals into rabbits sensitive eyes” (101). To imagine these animals sitting and waiting in fear for the next painful procedure to come is pure sickening. These incredibly cruel and painful tests animals have to go through are incredibly abominable to even think…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides animal testing, there are different alternatives then testing on animals. “In the Feasibility of Replacing Animal Testing for Assessing Consumer Safety: A Suggested Future Direction” written by Julia Fentem, Mark Chamberlain and Bart Sangster talks about how animal testing is usually done and gives some broad alternatives for animal testing. Since the 1960s, researchers wanted to develop alternatives to animal testing. The term “alternatives” is the three “R’s” of reduction, refinement, and replacement. The test of animals was primarily carried out for diagnostic purposes, assessments of safety and efficacy, and the purpose of research (Fentem 2).…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using Outdated Methods As technology advances computers become faster, science is able to reach to an even further understanding in research. While this is true Doke and Dhawale state in Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Review “Every year, millions of experimental animals are used all over the world” (224). The use of animals for research and lab experiments is not only an outdated method that harms animals, but is also unreliable and unneeded. Using animals for research and experimentation, while a lucrative business for many, has proven to be not “only unsafe, but also expensive, time-consuming, and unreliable” (“Limitations and Dangers”). It is true that the use of animals in research have been used to “obtain products like vaccines, anti-biotics…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays