Is Animal Testing Wrong

Superior Essays
Most people would agree that harming an animal is a cruel act to commit. Others believe that animal testing should be allowed because new human and animal related cures have been discovered by conducting the experiments. Some may think that since we are humans and animals are not, we have higher authority over the animals. Some people have protested, started movements and other organizations to try and stop animal experimenting. These innocent creatures are being tortured daily so we must step in and put an end to these disgraceful animal experimentations. Animal testing for medical research is wrong because of the lethal results, inhumane treatment, and lack of different testing methods.
Animal experimentation allows the conduction of extremely
…show more content…
Pat Thomas mentions, “Unfortunately, scientists have relied on these tests, and as a result, many of the drugs approved through animal experimentation have proven dangerous to humans”. Test theories fail most of the time because it does not work on humans and since we have such different body systems compared to the animals; therefore, the treatment is then rejected by the human body. approximately 15,000 new drugs are marketed every year, while some 12,000 are withdrawn. An example of the damage animal testing causes “According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1.5 million Americans were hospitalized in 1978 alone as a consequence of pharmaceutical drugs administered to "cure" them” (Thomas). The main point is that the experiments are non-affective for medical results and the animals are paying the price for our mistakes. Instead of wasting lives, we should be testing volunteer human subjects for human cures, not animal cures. Animals are fully awake and go through large amounts of pain while scientists are vivisecting them. The test animals are tortured and experimented on when they have not been sedated which is heartless and cruel sedated or not. If testing continues people will think it is acceptable to overpower animals and many more lives will be lost to lethal procedures. These …show more content…
Using animals to replace humans simply does not work, the animals cannot communicate the way a human would when they are ill. Another claim from Pat Thomas, “Animals, for instance, cannot let the experimenter know if they are suffering from headache, amnesia, nausea, depression and other psychological disturbances”. There are other options for finding cures such as using MRI imaging, computer modeling, in vitro testing and micro-dosing. The cost to experiment on animals has cost the US around eighteen billion dollars in experimenting. That money could have gone to the hungry, homeless, our schools, disabled veterans or even our nation’s debt. By using other testing strategies that do not include the torture and murder of millions of animals will not only save lives but valuable time and money. Using artificial human skin is one of the alternatives to animal experimentation, which is using cellular tissue that is just like human skin instead of the live animal’s flesh that will experience intense pain. The usage of MRI imaging will allow the researchers to have a look into the brain without doing any cutting. Then there is the vitro testing that is conducted by using cells in a test tube. The computer modeling will show the experimenters the damage that can occur and stimulate the results of the possible new medicine. The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After enduring a life of terror and pain almost all test subjects will be killed, if they do not die during the experiment (Animal Testing 101.) Animals do not deserve a life of suffering and pain just because humans might gain some knowledge about medicine or beauty products. With the number of effective alternatives that are available, animal testing should be put to an end. When it comes to the life, safety, and wellbeing of animals where do you…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jean Kazez Animal Testing

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal testing shouldn’t occur because it harms them and animals are pets and they’re like people. Animals mean no harm to people. Many animals get experimented on and scientist find many diseases and…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By relying on Animal Experimentation for our growing medical needs, we are, in reality, putting both human and animal lives at stake by experimenting with undependable data. For those who aren’t willing to give up Animal testing because they feel as if it is their only solution, try experimenting on the animals who actually need the operation. For example, you find a stray dog that just collided with the front of a truck, it happens to be moments from losing its legs. This is a perfect opportunity for a lab to study and operate on an animal, and learn from the experience. In a situation like this, both the dog and Medical personnel benefit from this experience.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are several people who are against animal experimentation (anti-vivisection), there is still the other side of people who under look the problem at hand and are okay with it happening. In their minds, they’re thinking that animal testing has been here for many, many years, so why put an end to it now? Others think, “animals cannot have rights because animals don’t respect human rights” (Mur, 31). Although this poll was taken around eighteen years ago and things may have changed since then, it still need to be put on the table. In 1996, 72% of people said that testing on animals is only sometimes wrong.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand there is no any guarantee that these results will be successful on implementing human beings. Thus animal testing can delay the discovery of treatment wasting money and effort as well. The development of polio vaccine in which “researchers spent decades infecting nonhuman primates with the disease and conducting other animal experiments, but failed to produce a vaccine”, (Results from Research on Animals Are Not Valid When Applied to Humans, 2015) which was then discover through in virto techniques, is one of the examples that proves animal experimentation just delay and impede the biomedical…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although one may argue animals should not be used in biomedical research because there are many alternative out there to substitute animal testing, and animals has feeling and show empathy when another is hurt; however, the truth of the matter is humankinds need to use animals for biomedical testing in order to advance human race because animal testing will help us further understand human diseases, animal share many similar genetic similarity between the human, and it is unethical to use human in biomedical researches. Animal testing has played a crucial role in the development of many lifesaving cures and surgeries; the lives that were saved by animal testing are so considerable that there is not even a figure today to estimate it. Using…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation is a big deal, it’s a situation that affects more than just animals. Even though it might not seem that important people are fighting every day to stop it. Did you ever wonder what it would feel like to be tested on with a risk of dying? Animals experiment with every day being tested on perfume products and new drugs. Even though it helps us, humans, it’s horrible, the worst part human don’t know how bad it is.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ban Animal Testing Essay

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After years of studying diseases such as cancer, diabetes, stroke, and AIDS in animals, we still don’t have reliable and effective cures. Due to the unreliable aspects of animal experimentation putting animals through these traumatic experiments is unethical and wrong. The question needs to be asked if animal testing is indeed essential and what are the equally effective options and benefits. Dr. Elias Zerhouni, former director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health admitted that experimenting on animals to benefit humans has been a big failure.” We have moved away from studying human disease in…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scientists like to use the defense that their experiments will lead to advancement in human health and medicine, but in reality, most of the information gathered will not help us. The American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) is a nonprofit organization that works toward eliminating procedures of groups that deal with animal cruelty. The AAVS declares that animal testing is not valid when testing treatments for human diseases because the treatments cannot reliably predict the outcomes when tested on humans. They stated, “…animal models have never been validated and the claim that animals are necessary for biomedical research is unsupported by scientific literature.” (Engdahl)…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Medical Research vs Animal Testing The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also ineffective. Animal research is a serious action against innocent animals. "Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means" (“Should Animals Be Used”). Animals do not need to be under these circumstances.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animals have rights that should be heard, there are other possible methods that can be used instead, and animals will end of reacting differently than humans for testing on…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    And with all the drugs that do go out there are “Indeed, many health problems currently afflicting humans, such as psychopathology, cancer, drug addiction, Alzheimer's, and AIDS, are species specific.” so not only is it cruel to the animals themselves it is affects us too. We could change someone's life in one second from information that has been wrongly proven. There are so many consequences of experimenting on animals and it has been affecting us “In fact, there have been numerous reports recently of approved drugs causing serious and unexpected health problems, leading the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to remove the products from the market or require black-box warnings on their labels. The FDA has reported that "adverse events associated with drugs are the single leading contributor to preventable patient injury, and may cost the lives of up to 100,000 Americans, account for more than 3 million hospital admissions, and increase the nation's hospitalization bill by up to $17 billion each year.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays