The cruelty of animal testing has recently been debated. In the past years it has become more and more common, and awareness is key to eliminating this issue. Dogs, cats, rabbits, mice, birds, monkeys and many other animals we adore, are being put into cages, receiving no care and suffering from neglect. Hundreds of animals die every day which can be avoided or minimized. If companies torture and kill animals that are considered non important existences easily at our disposal how is it possible while the other companies do not use animals to test on. For more precise results with product testing in laboratories there should be more unharming alternatives since some companies are going toward the direction of trying …show more content…
Technology developed, has the potential to offer cosmetic makers the ability to test without animals. The technology uses human skin cells grown in a lab rather than skin areas found on animals to stimulate an allergic response to foreign chemicals. Some of the alternatives is to use ingredients with the the majority of experience and
history in products, in light of the fact that they will already be known to be safe and therefore no testing is even required. According to Mark Constantine at the present time, there are hundreds of companies, producing products without a use of animals. Ending animal testing in Cosmetics is a no brainer.
In spite of the fact that animal testing has helped many medical advancements throughout the past it still is something that can be dealt with. Somehow, people are told that animal testing is very useful and the animals used are not harmed in any way. Animal testing will then hopefully end, and animals will no longer be tortured or killed as they are at this point in time. Animals do not have any opinion to this, as if humans are not volunteering in order to be tested on for products so why should we believe that animals wouldn’t care being tested on for humans