Zambranochange and cause harm to animals. As well, take their own rights away. Testing products on animals can lead to their deaths. Being widely known how certain cosmetic companies test their products. Many of the non-cruelty free cosmetic companies test product on animals including their eyes, which can lead to blindness and death (Zuckerman p). Animal testing has been provento be cruel and unethical. Secondly, animal testing in unreliable. Animals are different from humans. Yes, they might have similar genes, but that does not mean doing medical research on them will be correct.According to Helen Marston head Humane Research Australia, there are still too many unknownfactors in animals that would contribute to not having accurate medical
…show more content…
Rather than using animals to predict how a human will respond to a new medicine due to the fact that animals’ organ system is different from humans. There are facts that show that animals are different in many ways to humans and sometimes animals can react different to the toxicity of chemicals than humans. Helen Martson head of Humane Research has written, “ There are far too unknown variables that cannot all be accounted for” (36). Animal testing is not the most reliable source. Many things in medicine could be different if in-vitro testing was used more often.Many researchers and your everyday people would argue that animal testing is ethical and reliable source. However, they are not looking at the bigger picture of how many animals arebeing put through suffering, stress, and are being killed. Their animal rights are being taken away, which are protected by law. Secondly, animal testing in unreliable. They respond different to viruses and diseases as well as to treatment. Lastly, there are better ways to test medicine and products that require animal testing. There have been new advance developments done. Helen Marston has talked about how “humans differ from other animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically, meaning data derived from animals cannot be extrapolated to humans …show more content…
and Beck, Nancy. “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding AnimalTesting.” Plos One, 7 Sep. 2011,doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024059 Accessed 9 Sep. 2016Martson, Helen and Laurie Pycroft. “Is Animal Testing Necessary To Advance Medical Research?.” New Internationalist, Vol. 444, Jul. 2011. PP 34-3. Academic Search Complete,search.ebschohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=62091081&site=ehost-live. Accessed 25 Sep. 2016Zuckermar, Catherine. “Easy On The Eyes.” National Geographic, Vol. 228, no 1, Jul. 2015. P30. Academic Search Complete. search.ebschohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=103413553&site=ehost-live Accessed 25 Sep.
Rather than using animals to predict how a human will respond to a new medicine due to the fact that animals’ organ system is different from humans. There are facts that show that animals are different in many ways to humans and sometimes animals can react different to the toxicity of chemicals than humans. Helen Martson head of Humane Research has written, “ There are far too unknown variables that cannot all be accounted for” (36). Animal testing is not the most reliable source. Many things in medicine could be different if in-vitro testing was used more often.Many researchers and your everyday people would argue that animal testing is ethical and reliable source. However, they are not looking at the bigger picture of how many animals arebeing put through suffering, stress, and are being killed. Their animal rights are being taken away, which are protected by law. Secondly, animal testing in unreliable. They respond different to viruses and diseases as well as to treatment. Lastly, there are better ways to test medicine and products that require animal testing. There have been new advance developments done. Helen Marston has talked about how “humans differ from other animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically, meaning data derived from animals cannot be extrapolated to humans …show more content…
and Beck, Nancy. “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding AnimalTesting.” Plos One, 7 Sep. 2011,doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024059 Accessed 9 Sep. 2016Martson, Helen and Laurie Pycroft. “Is Animal Testing Necessary To Advance Medical Research?.” New Internationalist, Vol. 444, Jul. 2011. PP 34-3. Academic Search Complete,search.ebschohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=62091081&site=ehost-live. Accessed 25 Sep. 2016Zuckermar, Catherine. “Easy On The Eyes.” National Geographic, Vol. 228, no 1, Jul. 2015. P30. Academic Search Complete. search.ebschohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=103413553&site=ehost-live Accessed 25 Sep.