Animal Testing Banned

Decent Essays
Animal testing should be banned because scientist are force feeding animals, they are also wounding them, and many of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials. Animal testing is inhumane and cruel. There also many other things scientist can use other than animal testing.
Scientist are force feeding animals or they don’t feed the animals at all. For example (procon.org/page) it states in the text “prolonged periods of physical restraint”. This statement show that they are not feeding animals for a long period of time to test how long they can last. They are killing animals just for testing. Another examples is from (procon.org/page) it says “...animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation…” This shows that scientists are force feeding animals. It also shows that they are forcing them to inhale things that can kill them. Scientists are force feeding animals or they don’t feed the animals at all just for animal testing.
Scientists are also wounding and killing animals due to animal testing. For example (procon.org/page) states “burns and other wounds to study the healing process” This
…show more content…
For example in the article from (procon.org/page) it talks about all the alternatives it states “ In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used”. This shows that people have found other ways to test products. There are many things scientists can use other than animals. The text states “Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings.” Testing on animals don’t always work. Animals aren’t exactly the same as humans so they most likely not to work . 94% many of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animals are abused and injured just so humans can more easily find products that they can use. This should not be allowed. Animal testing is widespread and harms millions of animals all over the world. Many are tortured or…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, “Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease"(Cruelty-Free International Organisation). Experimenters are attempting to mirror human diseases by artificially creating symptoms in different species of animals, resulting in extremely inaccurate test results. Not only will it affect future test results, but it will also be dangerous for those who use the products. In addition, based on U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, nine out of ten experimental drugs are unsuccessful in clinical studies because experimenters cannot precisely predict how tests on animal species will perform in people, according to laboratory and animal studies.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Merck Animal Testing

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Since most of the data collected from animals are false, they cannot be used. When companies do decide to use the results from the animal testing they could often lead to an enormous failure. One such example is Vioxx, a drug that was supposed to treat arthritis (joint inflammation). The company, Merck & Co, have tested it on monkeys, one of the closest animals to humans, and five other species,and all the testing shown that the drug was same for humans. But when sold on the market, it was almost estimated to cause 500,000 heart attacks and stroke and 140,000 deaths worldwide.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example includes skin allergies on pigs. It can only predict human reactions by 72% , whereas cell-based alternatives predict human reactions 90% of the time(Alternatives to Animal Testing). Another test on pregnant rats allows scientist to detect 60% of the chemicals and drugs that are harmful to the developing baby; the cell based alternative has 100% accuracy. Other alternatives like in vitro testing can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells cad. On the flip side, just because a product is safe for animals, does not guarantee it is safe for humans.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing, although defective, has proven to be beneficial. Animal testing has contributed to medical science in a number of ways. Because of the complexity of the human body, scientists will argue that it is necessary to perform research on living animals. However, because humans and other animals vary significantly, these tests may not always produce accurate results. Although there are alternatives to animal testing, eliminating the usage of animals will slow the progress of medical advancement.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This shows that not using animals can be just as effective as using animals most of the time. This quote can also go to show that most scientists are open to new ideas and ways of testing the products so things can still change here in the near future. The 92% statistic comes from an earlier report which showed only 8% of those drugs passing animal testing stages would go on successfully to be FDA approved (Understanding Animal Research) Is even just one life worth an 8% chance that a drug will pass and be approved by the FDA? With these other methods of testing the same products the passing rate may be higher or about the same. Either way taking the route of not using animals is best for now and for the long run.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of people believe that because many scientific breakthroughs require animal testing but what they don’t understand is that just because they used animal testing doesn’t mean the breakthrough came from the testing. Many times breakthroughs use animal testing but don’t actually use any of the information they got from the testing due to the fact it can be inconclusive to use animals and assume that humans will react the same way. Also you can say that animals are better test subjects due to their short life span but the animals that do have short life spans don’t prove to be genetically similar to us at all including lab rats and other kind of…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing is no longer effective in today’s society. Testing has no purpose, it has been said many a time that it is useless and unnecessary. There is a higher chance of flipping a coin and being accurate in a test than actually doing the research and testing on animals. To see if a new product is safe it goes through a whole process where animals are being mistreated for the benefits of humans. Animals in experiments today are bred for the sole purpose of the particular experiment, so once the experiment ends, the animals have no value, and end up getting euthanized, because they are useless to scientists.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, testing and studying on animals has helped the development for several life saving cures and treatments for both animals and humans. Therefore, scientific and commercial testing on animals within a government regulated and inspected facility provides humane testing for biological advancements. One of the biggest arguments against animal testing is that it is cruel and inhumane. Many of the tests and experiments conducted on animals cause them harm…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animals all over the globe are sitting in a cage right now, scared, cold and alone waiting for the next experiment to be done to them. They sit in this cage longing for the day that they are able to free, if they survive the experiments or if they are of no longer need to the scientists. Every year there are millions of animals killed in laboratories from the tests and experiments done to them. These poor, defenseless animals are poisoned, shocked, and burned during these tests and are often killed because of this. If these actions were done outside of a laboratory it would be considered animal abuse.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has documented that "each year, more than 100 million animals are treated cruel within the laboratories of animal testing (Peta, par 1). " Performing research on animals should be illegal because it is unethical to sentence animals to life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them harm. Animals who are caged continuously without any freedom should be considered animal cruelty. Many researchers should also understand that animal testing does not always accurately predict results in humans. Animals are different from humans and that can bring about poor testing results.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals have been used in scientific testing for thousands of years.(Animal Testing) This means that animal testing has been done for science since the Greek Era. “The Humane Society of the United States estimates that more than twenty-five million animals are used in scientific testing and research each year.(Animal Testing)” The experiments used on the animals include injecting or forcing animals to eat potentially harmful substances, exposing them to radiation, and destroying or removing organs deliberately. “This is known as Vivisection originally meant the dissection of a live animal, usually for the purpose of teaching or research.(Vivisection)” Making them inhale toxins, and creating horrible situations for the animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays