Animal Test Subjects In Biomedical Research

Improved Essays
Animal Test Subjects in Biomedical Research
INTRODUCTION:
BACKGROUND: The first evidence of animal testing dates back to ancient times, where scientists studied the anatomical structures of deceased subjects (Scutti). Living animals were experimented on by Greek physician-scientists and used to examine nerves and tendons (Scutti). In Rome, during the 2nd century, a physician named Galen of Pergamum practiced anatomy, physiology, pathology and pharmacology on animals (Scutti). He was the first to describe the cardio-pulmonary system, and he also speculated on the functions of the brain and the spinal cord (Scutti). Andreaus Vesalius, who lived in sixteenth-century Italy, was a teacher that demonstrated anatomy on a live animal, usually a dog,
…show more content…
Scientists use “good” models – subjects that mimic parts of the human body and its functions because no animal completely and successfully represents human biology (“Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”). Primates have the most phylogenic similarities to humans, sharing 98% of our genes, though the results are still inaccurate (“Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”; M.P.H., “Why Animal Experimentation Doesn’t Work – Reason 3”; “Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”). A therapeutic antibody to monkeys, called anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412, triggered a potentially fatal immune response for people (“Animals in Science – The Differences Between Humans and the Animal Model”). One scientist’s opinion on the relatively similar genetic makeup between primates and humans is that “…any animal close enough to us to be of value in research was close enough to be valued for itself; an end in and of itself, not a means to an end” (“Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”). Cats, dogs, rats, mice, sheep, and rabbits are among the many other species that are commonly used during experiments (M.P.H., “Why Are Animal Experimentation Doesn’t Work – Reason 3…”). Penicillin was determined to be ineffective when it was tested on animals and proved to be toxic to guinea pigs, although it safely and effectively treats bacterial infections in humans (Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”). Aspirin caused birth defects in mice and rats but is harmless to humans and is used commonly for managing pain or preventing strokes (Animals in Science – The Failure of the Animal Model”). The most noted failure was HIV/AIDS research because all of the ninety tested vaccines failed in humans (M.P.H., “Why Animal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is an ongoing debate among people due to the reasoning, pros and cons, and the alternative choices available. There are many reasons that people test on animals. “Animal experimentation became the primary method of learning about anatomy, physiology, and disease processes.” (13). Using animals for…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing has been around since ancient times. Ancient greek and Romans tested different medical procedures on animals purely to satisfy curiosity. Because anaesthetics were not discovered until near the end of the nineteenth century, all of these experiments were tested on animals without pain relief. Anyone that has accidently stepped on their dog’s paw, knows that animals definitely feel pain. Back in the 1500’s there was an Anatomy and Physiology professor, named Andreas Vesalius.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilizing living animal for the benefit of researcher and for the testing many types of products has been a matter of heated debate for for many of years now. Many people consider animals as pets or companions; whereas others look upon animals as only aids for researchers to study on. Despite peoples feeling towards animals, the reality is that animals across the country and around the world animals are being abused by cosmetics companies and research facilities. Even though humans sometimes benefit from successful animal testing, the pain, the torment, and deaths of the animals are not worth the potential benefits it may bring to humans. However, With all the new advancements in medical and scientific technology, the pain and suffering of…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Heart attacks, organ failure, and lethal dysrhythmias are only a few of the dreadful reactions humans have suffered through on medication as a result of the inaccuracy of animal testing (Greek). Using animals for experiments is incredibly inaccurate due to the vast differences between animal and human biological makeup (Animal Aid). As a result, during past experiments, medications have had “totally the opposite effect” on animals than they did on humans (Animal Aid). Consequently, after already turning innocent animals into unhealthy victims while producing these products, humans themselves have also become oblivious victims to this research technique as they consume these unreliable items. Scientists spend many stressful hours conducting research through this unstable technique, while their outcomes are rarely advancements in health care.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At what cost does humanity pay for the advancements in beauty and health? Every year the United States alone is responsible for a hundred million casualties in many animals due to the use of animal experimentation. This form of experimentation has been the bases of scientific research for many decades, even though, it may not be the most ethical way to discover new medical and cosmetic advancements. While they are taking advantage of their beauty products and vaccines, many lives are lost trying to perfect product for human consumption. The cost of perfecting such items is costly not for humans at least but for the animals that have to undergo so much suffering just to make another pill, medication, cream, etc.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With America choosing to throw out products tested on animals, the question people must ask themselves is, is animal testing really that bad? Arguing that rats who were born in laboratories and raised to be tested on is wrong, it makes people wonder if it really is bad. Animals are very similar to humans and resemble them outstandingly. With critters slowly becoming a widely talked about source in the world, communities have begun a debate about what side to be on. “My own experience of over 60 years in biomedical research amply demonstrated that without the use of animals and of human beings, it would have been impossible to acquire the important knowledge needed to prevent much suffering and premature death not only among humans but also among [other] animals.” said Albert Sabin, who was a Polish American medical researcher, best known for developing the oral polio vaccine which has played a key role in nearly eradicating the disease.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Nonhumane

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing has been an enormous discussion in the biomedical realm over the last fifty years due to a question of superiority and injustice among species. Scientists perform “medical research” on animals in order to “benefit” mankind by elongating the human life span. In reality, several of these experiment results have no direct or immediate purpose in the medical industry, but rather are legal ways for researchers to test interests and personal curiosity. For instance, in Case I, one researcher decided to use baboons as test subjects to understand the effects of brain trauma.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When animals are used in medical research, it is great way to uncover the mysteries and find treatments or even cures for various diseases. For example, in Shany Sun’s Young Scientists Journal article, “The Truth Behind Animal Testing,” the author says, “…medical advancements that have been discovered through animal testing include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin (that controls blood sugar levels of diabetics), kidney transplants, and vaccines for polio and meningitis” (Sun 1). This example shows just how beneficial animal testing in medical research can be. These medical advancements would not have been available for years if animal testing had not…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation has participated a vital role in biomedical research throughout history, however for centuries it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion. While there are countless historical overviews of animal experimentation in specific areas and time spans, and a minority on the ethical controversy, there is presently no inclusive review article on the animal research, the communal controversy surrounding it, and the appeal of various historical moral perspectives on animal experimentation. Animal studies in science, morals and social inferences from a historical understanding. It is significant to thoroughly evaluate present principles and practises in animal testing to understand the past. Animal experimentation…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One research case that was done found that 95% of drugs tested on animals failed on humans. A total of 93 side effects found on humans, only 19% were predicted on the animals. The same exact study learned that when rats and mice were used for testing, they were only 43% accurate. A particular drug, called Vioxx used for arthritis, showed that it was safe during the animal testing stage. However, in 2004 it was taken off the market.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassidy Walton Professor Marek English 1101 Sec. 54AZ 6 June 2018 Annotated Bibliography: Animal Testing Animal testing is one of the most frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the human race. There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. The testing of animals helps the human race better understand the way animals react to the cures, and to help find cures for the diseases.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the applications of animal research to human medicine are limited and often useless. Dr. Aysha Akhtar identifies “three major conditions [that] …. explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, [fail] to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics” (“The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation”). These conditions are irresolvable hindrances to the advancement of human medicine; it would be more efficient and beneficial to humans to explore innovative technological alternatives that resemble human physiology more closely. In addition, the idea of sacrificing the welfare of animals to advance the welfare of humans is flawed in that it necessarily places more weight on the rights of humans, which violates the deontological view on the rights of sentient beings.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C.A 2008 study in the journal, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, showed that more than eighty HIV/AIDS vaccines were successful in nonhuman primates, but were unsuccessful in human trials. D.Drugs intended to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, previously tested in mice, failed in nearly one hundred fifty human critical…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays