Fisher (2014) cites that in the last a hundred years, animals and humans have gained indirectly or directly from animal research, treatments for HIV and cancer, and from antibiotics medications and insulin. Most of these healthcare achievements have been awarded Nobel Prizes. According to the scientific community, the suitability of employing animals in research is found in both the anticipations that the findings of the research will be substantial and meaningful and that animal suffering will be negligible. The perception that humankind bears the privilege and mandate to make this judgement is founded on different philosophical arguments.
Position of this Paper The royal society has been recognized as one among few scientific academies …show more content…
Festing and Wilkinson (2007) identifies that the suffering experienced by animals in the course of experiments does not equal the results attained. Moreover, some scholars assert that the facilities for animal testing are not correctly regulated. They identified that numerous undercover evaluations have resulted in attaining evidence of animal abuse and cruelty in pharmaceutical companies and universities. Due to this, opponents identify that there is no rationale for torture of animals with reference to animal research as a bad science since some of the circumstances are usually induced (animal models). Ghasemi and Dehpour (2009) articulated that some drugs that are administered to the animals usually have devastating side effects, which are not earlier envisaged by animal models. However, over the past years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) institution that gives the go ahead on the usage of different drugs has attained major milestones. These milestones have seen that the passage of the drugs that can be consumed by humans is enveloped by stringent and severe laws that regulate the process of validation for these drugs. This has helped in ensuring that there are balanced procedures that end up in the consumption stage of these drugs (Verrinder, Ostini & Phillips, 2016). Standardization has been an important element in animal research because the environment of the experiment is also of much importance like the processes
Position of this Paper The royal society has been recognized as one among few scientific academies …show more content…
Festing and Wilkinson (2007) identifies that the suffering experienced by animals in the course of experiments does not equal the results attained. Moreover, some scholars assert that the facilities for animal testing are not correctly regulated. They identified that numerous undercover evaluations have resulted in attaining evidence of animal abuse and cruelty in pharmaceutical companies and universities. Due to this, opponents identify that there is no rationale for torture of animals with reference to animal research as a bad science since some of the circumstances are usually induced (animal models). Ghasemi and Dehpour (2009) articulated that some drugs that are administered to the animals usually have devastating side effects, which are not earlier envisaged by animal models. However, over the past years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) institution that gives the go ahead on the usage of different drugs has attained major milestones. These milestones have seen that the passage of the drugs that can be consumed by humans is enveloped by stringent and severe laws that regulate the process of validation for these drugs. This has helped in ensuring that there are balanced procedures that end up in the consumption stage of these drugs (Verrinder, Ostini & Phillips, 2016). Standardization has been an important element in animal research because the environment of the experiment is also of much importance like the processes