The Live Exportation Of Animals

Improved Essays
The live export of animals is a process in which animals, mostly cattle, sheep and goats, are sent overseas. Australia in particular ships millions of animals yearly overseas. Exporting live animals is wrong and needs to stop. The outcome of this exportation is tortuous and results in illness causing death for most animals, and those who do survive are subject to being slaughtered in countries with incompetent laws against cruelty. Although there is no ‘humane’ way to kill animals, Australian livestock are being treated especially inhumane in the way they are killed by importing countries. Every year, thousands of animals born in Australia, where they have care and protection, are exported whilst alive and fully aware of their surroundings, to be killed in foreign countries where there are no laws …show more content…
This can be seen through pets. Many believe that the life of a pet is more valuable than that of a pig. When in reality, studies have shown that pigs are smarter than dogs and have excellent long-term memories. Even through the eyes of the law some people will be sent to jail for the abuse of a singular pet, yet very rarely are people imprisoned for the torture of thousands of animals when due to the cruel trade of live exportation.

However, it is unreasonable and unrealistic to immediately cease the exportation of animals. If the live export trade is banned immediately, it will incur negative repercussions for animals that would have been exported to foreign countries. If the exportation comes to an immediate cease the Australian producers cannot provide for these animals from their resources. They will be unable to purchase more feed because the price of cattle would significantly decline due to a surplus. As a resolution, Australia should only send animals overseas to slaughterhouses that treat their animals as ethically as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay-2 CHALLENGE FROM MARGINAL CASES Having gone through the ‘Challenge from Marginal Cases: in the Article “Puppies, Pigs and People”, it seems the author Alastair Norcross is of the view that any mutilation or torture to non-human animals is morally impermissible irrespective of the actions of Fred’s behavior and torture of the animals or slaughtering or mutilation of farmed animals. He argues that there is no difference as the animal is mutilated in either case. In one case Fred tortures his puppies directly to obtain cocoamone for his pleasure whereas in other case farmed animals are slaughtered to cater the need of the people. From the above I feel, Fred is a rare consumer of cocoamone and the way he treats or torture puppies himself in an unorganized way and keep animal…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “No decent person would even contemplate torturing puppies merely to enhance a gustatory experience” (Norcross 2). However, to eat chicken, beef, pork, etc. the animals experience more harsh and intense suffering in facilities for us to eat their meat. The difference between us eating these meats and Fred’s actions is that we are paying others to do the job. It is argued that should we not also partially receive consequences too for eating these tortured animals.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and Dignity” by Ed Yong, discussed and attempted to promgulate the humane treatments of primates, especially those used for experimentation. Yong also elaborated on the Great Ape Project, an association established to gain a basic set of rights for chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutans. Furthermore, he asserted that there are studies and data proving that animals are capable of experiencing pain and other emotions, and therefore, it is only logic to give them the treatment they deserve. In addition, some animals, particularly primates, are genetically linked with humans; in that sense, it is undeniable that they should be allowed to share the basic rights that humans…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Elizabeth Schoales very eloquently delineated the issues Canada has with animal protection laws and standards. She dissected the Canadian laws and legislation for animal protection and pointed out the many flaws. Vague language, protection of the industries instead of the animals and a lack of stringency in supporting these laws are reoccurring themes. Animals, she pointed out, are not all regarded equally under the Canadian laws throughout the country, all depending on their use as pets, in hunting and fishing, research, or food production. Schoales also went as far to explain that the lack of anthropomorphism towards animals is the cause of much of their negligence.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the treatment of animals by humans is unjust. As a species, starting long ago, humans have killed animals and have eaten their meat as a means of survival. In recent years, however, the desire for meat has come to the point where animals are being forcefully strangled to death and are being genetically manipulated to quickly grow and die. The people who have killed those animals may have had good intentions––to supply food to consumers––but the food was…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ten Trusts Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Us humans are very cruel to animals. We use animals to test all these vaccines and keep them caged. Some animals are used just for our entertainment. We breed animals and use them to feed our vast population. The authors want these animals to be freed the way we are.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You ever wondered what went on down in the United States when they trade food to other countries? You ever wondered what the animals were being fed to them just to be slaughtered afterward? Well, most of the answers will terrify you! Most of the animals are being fed pesticides and dead corpses within those unsanitary farmhouses. It’s honestly more like a prison for those poor animals.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal extortion is an ongoing issue in relationship to animal welfare and rights. There seems to be some ethical areas that individuals feel need to be changed on how humans use animals for human personal benefits. The argument supporting animal extortion and maltreatment has been the same for generations, including this view on animals used for experiments, “These benefits to humans far outweigh the costs in suffering that relatively few animals have had to endure. Society has an obligation to maximize the opportunities to produce such beneficial consequences, even at the cost of inflicting some pain on animals” (Andre & Velasquez, 1988). When looking at public policy and a resolution, it becomes a question of overcoming this…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Country SWOT a. Australia’s Political System Consumers in Australia have high disposable incomes, where it allows them to spend freely on beverage and food items. The competition is strong in the dairy industry. Where the competition is so strong no single business is able to force another leading business out of the market, by this it ensures that the competition remains high (Australian Government, n.d.). Australia is thriving domestic agribusiness sectors and is one of the world’s largest exporters of key agriculture commodities including dairy products, and meat.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Cruelty In Zoos

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine a young helpless animal being taken from its home in the wildlife and held in captivity, behind bars and gates, held a prisoner to the world. Each year, thousands of animals are ripped away from their homes and their families and are used for entertainment. Zoos are a popular attraction for kids and adults; it gives people the opportunity to get up close and personal with some their favorite animals. Zoos even allow people to feed and pet the animals, which make zoos very well-liked and enjoyable amongst all the animals’ lovers. What people tend to overlook when visiting these zoos is all the nutritional and emotional deprivation the animals go through each day, nor does anyone know the animal cruelty that goes on when the zoos are closed.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is wrong to mistreat animals because mistreating animals is like mistreating another human being. Animals feel pain the same way humans feel pain. They are living beings and bleed like humans bleed. This alone isn’t what distinguishes animals from having or not having rights. Animals do have rights to a certain extent.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals should be taken more seriously because of the cruelty suffered by animals at amusement events, factories and in the research field. Animals ethics is a term to describe the way the human reacts with the animal and how the animal should properly be treated. Many philosophers believe that since animals doesn’t have the moral judgement that humans have, then anyone can do whatever they want to do them because they don’t know right from wrong. An animal is very important, the animal will know if what is happening to them is normal or not, many things people do to them wouldn’t be something they experience on a daily basis. Animals doesn't deserve to be treated any differently than humans.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    " Growing Pains: The Developing Relationship of Animal Welfare Standards and the World Trade Rules. " Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 19.2 (2010): 227-238. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays