Animal Farm
Turning pages of a book or the quiet buzz of a movie? Both the same, yet different. The book and movie Animal Farm are based on the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. The book is an allegory to the event, simplifying it and shortening it, but with the same meaning. The Bolsheviks led a revolution to overthrow the unfair imperial autocracy in Russia, run by Czar Nicholas II, and once doing that, turned it into a communist country. In the book and movie the animals rebel against and drive out their cruel owner, Mr Jones, and set up an animalist farm, renaming it from Manor Farm to Animal Farm. Many believe that the ending of the movie “Animal Farm” was more truthful to the events that happened in Russia than the book. However, the ending of the movie is not accurate. The book ending to the story Animal Farm was better because it describes the details of the ending and it is accurate to the real life event. First, at the end of the book there were many important details that the movie did not have.
In the book …show more content…
At the end of the movie the animals send word to the other farms about the cruelties of Napoleon. Animals from all over go to Animal Farm and rebel against the pigs at the party, and kill them in a rage stampede courtesy of the animals. However, this didn’t actually happen in real life until a few generations after Stalin’s death. Joseph Stalin, represented as Napoleon, retains control of Russia until his natural death in 1953. In the movie, Napoleon is killed, making it inaccurate to the real life event that occured. Though many people believe the movie ending was better, it wasn’t. In Conclusion the book ending to the story Animal Farm is better. Whether it’s from details or accuracy, the overall effect from the book’s ending suits what happened in life more than what happened at the end of the movie. If the Bolshevik Revolution had never of happened, how would it affect
Turning pages of a book or the quiet buzz of a movie? Both the same, yet different. The book and movie Animal Farm are based on the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. The book is an allegory to the event, simplifying it and shortening it, but with the same meaning. The Bolsheviks led a revolution to overthrow the unfair imperial autocracy in Russia, run by Czar Nicholas II, and once doing that, turned it into a communist country. In the book and movie the animals rebel against and drive out their cruel owner, Mr Jones, and set up an animalist farm, renaming it from Manor Farm to Animal Farm. Many believe that the ending of the movie “Animal Farm” was more truthful to the events that happened in Russia than the book. However, the ending of the movie is not accurate. The book ending to the story Animal Farm was better because it describes the details of the ending and it is accurate to the real life event. First, at the end of the book there were many important details that the movie did not have.
In the book …show more content…
At the end of the movie the animals send word to the other farms about the cruelties of Napoleon. Animals from all over go to Animal Farm and rebel against the pigs at the party, and kill them in a rage stampede courtesy of the animals. However, this didn’t actually happen in real life until a few generations after Stalin’s death. Joseph Stalin, represented as Napoleon, retains control of Russia until his natural death in 1953. In the movie, Napoleon is killed, making it inaccurate to the real life event that occured. Though many people believe the movie ending was better, it wasn’t. In Conclusion the book ending to the story Animal Farm is better. Whether it’s from details or accuracy, the overall effect from the book’s ending suits what happened in life more than what happened at the end of the movie. If the Bolshevik Revolution had never of happened, how would it affect