Animal Testing In The 21st Century

Improved Essays
Animal Experimentation needed in the 21ST Century? Imagine if you were in a cage, imprisoned with no way out. You’re hungry, apathetic, and in pain but you’re only allowed to eat whenever they want you to eat, you’re only allowed to get out whenever they need you, and instead of alleviating your pain they increase it. They’ve drugged you, dissected you, and tested on you without even asking for your consent. Did you do something wrong? Was it your destiny to be trapped and used for the benefit of others? Was your death in anyway significant at all? This horrific nightmare is of course not real, to you at least, but the same cannot be said to the millions of animals that go through these horrendous experiences. Animal experimentation is something …show more content…
¬¬In the past, animal experimentation was helpful for the advancement in medical science and other types of science, but lately animal experimentation has not helped. It has not helped with the more advanced sicknesses or diseases. “Where are the cures for cancer and AIDS, [animal activists] ask, if animal research has been so worthwhile” (Day 13). Those who disagree also point out that animal testing has saved us by checking to see if certain products or drugs are safe for human use (Clemmitt 10). Although this is true, there is still the risk of a product working on animals and not on humans. Vlasak, a surgeon and leader of the North American Animal Liberation Press Office, says, “Half of the drugs that test as safe on animals turn out to not work or be safe in people, so you might as well flip a coin” (qtd. in Clemmitt 10). What is the point of testing on animals if there’s the risk of it not even working on humans? On a more moral based point, people of the opposing side think it’s alright to experiment on animals because they think animals are much more inferior to us. We are more intelligent and capable than all the other species on Earth; therefore we are allowed to do whatever we want with those beneath us, right? Well what about those with special needs, who are mentally incapable of providing for themselves. Are …show more content…
It has been ineffective for decades now, proving that animal experimentation has no use in today’s times. Nothing of actual value has been discovered by experimenting on animals lately. There are also new alternative ways to test drugs, which have been proven to be much more accurate and much more affordable than the alternative. In addition to the ineffectiveness of animal testing results and new methods, animal experimentation has been proven to not be safe not only for animals, but for humans as well. A drug tested on animals to prove if it’s safe for humans is a very risky move because all drugs affect various species differently. Lastly, do we have the right to test on these creatures? ”There is no doubt that animals experience a life… Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction” (Cothran 29). Animals feel much more pain that what we think and have a life that they should be allowed to live without the intrusion of humans. Animal experimentation, one of the many injustices we still have, should be a thing of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although animals and human may be similar, they are not entirely identical. In his article,” Breakthroughs Might Mean the End of Animal Testing”, John Ericson maintains that “Side effects are missed, and millions of dollars are wasted. Even if a new chemical entity is deemed safe at the animal stage, it still only has an 8 percent chance of being approved for human use.” Ericson argues that even if a new drug is considered safe for animal use, it is still not likely to be approved safe for human consumption. Which brings back the topic that animal testing is not one hundred percent reliable, because humans and animals are not identical, anatomically, or genetically . Animal testing has been the primary way to test the effects of drugs, but there are numerous occasions where the side effects were easily missed. As a result of that, chemist are left to rely on a process very close to guesswork…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing is one of the most frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the human race. There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. The testing of animals helps the human race better understand the way animals react to the cures, and to help find cures for the diseases. There is a lot of discussions if these testings are the right thing to do. More so, if we didn’t have it, it could be catastrophic.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women. Replacing hormones gives women a higher risk of suffering heart disease or stroke. When this same procedure was tested on monkeys the results came out as positive. Aidsvax did protect chimpanzees from getting AIDS but it showed the opposite on humans (Archibald) . These are a couple of examples, but there hundreds of other cases, that prove to the world that animal testing is not needed. Besides being unnecessary and a huge waste of money, it is not worth it to put innocent animals in distress for something that after all that pain was fruitless for humanity and science. Animal testing is erratic for humans, the country could invest that saved money on more useful purposes like…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of animals are used everyday for scientific experimentation. This practice has been around for years dating back as far back as 500 BC. People of ancient times would want to experiment on animals just out of curiosity. Understandable, but has created such a dilemma in today’s society. There are many arguments going back and forth on if animal testing should be continued or stopped due to the reality of it all. The reality is that animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and unnecessary. Is it worth it? Does it really help us? Should it be stopped? Are there dangers to it or misconceptions? Despite being around for so long, it’s not worth it and doesn’t really help us. The experimentation of animals should…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A highly controversial, and relatively new, argument of utilizing animals in the testing and development of medical research has left scientists in the crossroads on the ethics behind the entire operation. Approximately twenty-six million animals are in the United Stated each year for both scientific and commercial testing, in which these animals are used for a wide range of dangerous procedures. These animals are used for testing the safety of medications for human consumption, determining the toxicity of medical procedures, and ultimately develop stable medical treatments to name a few. Personally, my viewpoint lies in the middle ground as I am both a proponent, from the positive products of research, and opponent, limiting suffering, of using animals in the testing and development of medical research. In this paper, I will be exploring the ethics, regulations, and history behind medical researchers and their experiments on animals.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation has been an extraordinarily controversial topic since animal testing first began. Although I do not wish to exacerbate feud with an unforeseeable end I feel that I am obliged to bring some points to light. On one side of the fence there are animal rights activists who wish to protect vulnerable being who have no voice but on the other side thousands if not millions of helpless people are dying of illnesses of which a cure could be found if only animals were to be tested upon.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right now over one million animals are being tortured and tested on throughout the United States. (“Animal Testing 101”) These animals include birds, dogs, cats, bunnies, and so much more. These animals have no protection from the harsh examinations the scientists do with them. They are in inhumane living and have no time to play, like an animal should do. Their living conditions are bleak and in total solitary.(“Animals in Testing and Research”) These government and university laboratories are no place for an animal to live their life.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living inside a locked closet without any control over any aspect of your life. Over the years, billions of animals are used for experiments and getting harmed in labs. Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test in which a life of an animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. Animals benefit us humans in many ways such as providing milk, for fun and entertainment, recreation, for work, transport, cultivation and many more, these are reasons why humans need animals. So why kill them? In unnecessary experiments. Animal testing needs to be put to an end because it's harmful to animals, it is wasteful and animals are just as…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Dilemmas

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Volkswagen is currently under a fire because it has come to light that they help fund tests where humans and monkeys inhaled diesel fumes for hours. The nature of the tests is still not known, as the findings have not been made public, however two independent scientists that have conducted air pollution tests on human volunteers told BBC that similar tests on humans are common (Gunter, 2018). The controversial and unethical testing was found to be funded by a lobbyist group, not independent or by government. In these tests, “participants spend up to two hours in a sealed environment chamber breathing diluted diesel fumes equivalent to the levels of air pollution in Beijing or Delhi”…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, of the tiny eight percent of successes that occurred, half were required to be relabelled because of side effects that weren’t noted throughout animal testing. When one picks up on these statistics, it really makes them question what exactly makes people think this is worth the torment that these animals must endure. Many argue that “Many experiments are not painful at all to the animal subjects, therefore they are justified tests.” Did you know that in the United States there is a sole law that governs the hospitality of animals during the testing process on them within labs? This law is called the “Animal Welfare Act”. This act states that animals may be forcibly restrained, burned, shocked, starved, poisoned, brain-damaged, and addicted to drugs. None of these things are banned in any experiment whatsoever, despite how much pain the animals may be in. The law does not even require painkillers or any pain-nulling drugs to be used at all. Since this act specifically does not include birds, rats, or any cold blooded animals; ninety five percent of animals used in labs do not even have the minimal protection this act gives at…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing should not be performed because it is inaccurate. Ray Creek, a board -certified doctor, explains why the use of animals slows down medical research. He says that animal experiments provide misleading data. At best, experiments tell us about how animals experience disease, but hardly tell us something of value that can be applied to humans. What good is it for us using animals to test medicines if it is not even useful? Ray Creek also said that the General Accounting Office several years ago concluded that animal tests do not accurately predict how dangerous a drug will be in humans. In other words, drug tests on animals do not protect humans from harmful medications. It is hard to continue to use this procedure, especially where it does no good, and…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has come a time in Human History when technology and medications are now evolving more than ever. Animal Experimentation was said to be the key to society’s advancement, but is it really worth the lives of the 100 million innocent animals taken each year? “Animal Experimentation is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm” (Humane Society International). No living organism should have to endure a laboratory experience and undergo forceful cruelty. Animal testing should cease to continue because testing is costly and time-consuming, Animal’s produce unreliable data, and Animal lives are taken in barbaric…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animals that are used for experiments go through horrible tests. According to PETA scientists will “breeds dozens of monkeys every year to be prone to mental illness. Half of the babies are torn away from their mothers in order to inflict mental trauma on them, and they’re never allowed to see each other again. These babies suffer from horrible fear, anxiety, and depression. Their misery leads to hair loss, diarrhea, and even self-mutilation.” In other experiments PETA says that some farming companies leave their animals to starve and die later on. Society does not seem to realize that animals have feelings just like humans. Animals get scared, they can be sad, and worried. Scientists seem to “forget” that they have feelings as well and…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would someone feel if they were confined in a cage only to experience pain, torture, and isolation for research purposes? We have been doing that to living things for countless years, except not to humans, but to animals instead. We torment animals using unethical experiments, with little to no success. In the USA, billions of dollars is spent every year to fund these horrendous experiments. The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports this cruelty, and funds about 40% of its annual budget as well. But should experimenting on animals be allowed? Definitely not. The results are unreliable, as animals and humans are different biochemically and biologically. It is also a tremendous waste of resources, and finally, animal testing is extremely unethical.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays