Animal Ethics: The Importance Of Ethics In Relation To Animals

Improved Essays
Animal Ethics
In humans, Ethics is the manner in which an individual behaves. Ethics is norms set aside to define the correct and incorrect way that people conduct themselves in the society. These norms might be acquired, or they emerge from religious believes, state regulations, ethnic group and popular culture. An individual executes good ethics when he or she does what is acceptable in the society (Kemmerer 274). Human beings coexist with numerous animals in the society, and this forced the society to create Animal ethics. This creation focuses on the relationship that men and animals have since individuals use animals in many ways. It is vital to note that human beings are responsible for taking care most or all animals in the environment.
…show more content…
In relation to animals, it is a fact that they do not talk or communicate. Animals are not capable of accessing certain rights since they can not do things that human beings do. In relation to humans, it is a fact that animals cannot access the right to talk, religion, and to work only to mention but a few. Individuals who do not believe in animal ethics use such excuses to disregard animals since they believe that animals are incapable of giving back to them (Roleff 40). For example, animals do not think so they can harm an individual anytime. These notions intensify the debate about animal ethics. Animals do not speak and communicate emotions, but they deserve to be treated well since they are living things. Human beings who do not believe in animal ethics should look at the brighter side since animals such as dogs make other human beings …show more content…
This body solely focuses on animal welfare and its rights. This study also explores aspects of human welfare since it is critical in explaining the aspect of animal ethics. This body was formed in order to create regulations in relation to the manner in which animals should be used for teaching and scientific experiments (Dolan 14). Human beings have disregarded the emotions and wellbeing of animals when they are using them for experiments. Common issues such as using animals without injecting any anesthetic medicine are also addressed by this body. This body has given restrictions in the manner and type of animals to be used for any scientific research in participating countries (Kemmerer 202). The only people supposed to handle animals are the vet nary doctors and specialist in medical animal

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many people aren’t willing to acknowledge that animals feel pain and suffer too. Animal welfare was set up to protect animals from any physical harm done by humans such as abuse, experiments, etc. Unlike, animals rights activist, animal welfare activist sometimes support animal testing as long as the animal is cared for, fed, and treated well. On the other hand, rights activist…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As discussed previously, animal testing for medical use is ethical because it furthers human knowledge and safety, whereas using animals for cosmetics is unethical because it doesn’t further our knowledge just tests what we already know. Numerous cosmetic companies test on animals because they want to add untested ingredients that aren’t necessary to add into their products ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing"). These ingredients aren 't necessary to use because there are already pre-tested and safe ingredients that can be used instead, so there doesn’t have to be testing on animals. Cruelty-free companies use the already many safe ingredients available in their products, so they do not test on animals ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing”). If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans, animals, plants and all kinds of creatures live in this planet relevant to each other in an established order. To maintain the order and to keep the planet habitable we are responsible for our actions against other creatures. This leads to the point that we have some moral obligations towards animals. To clarify, we as humans can not cause unnecessary pain that even Edwin Locke who is against animal rights agrees upon (Edwin Locke, 1). However, these moral obligations do not include meat eating which many of animal rightists strongly disagree on but indeed include not to have animal agriculture under very cruel conditions.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, animals do have the right to be respected in disregard of the fact that animals may not necessarily enjoy the same right as human. So it is immoral to allow animals to be utilized as mere means in animal experimentation. According to Regan, the only explainable reason for an individual to undergo painful experiments would be to benefit these very same individual, or through their own will. For example, this would justify performing therapeutic procedures in animals, as well as in children and people with disabilities that cannot express their consent. So experimentation aiming in testifying products is in no way…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal welfare is how well the animals should be treated. Michael C. Appleby explains animal welfare as, “Ethical concern over the quality of life of animals” (19). If one believes in animal welfare then does one believe in animal rights also? Animals get mistreated in different settings whether circuses, zoos or factories. According to the “Animal Rights Debate” Rich…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. It is often argued that we treat animals morally wrong by testing chemicals on them to make sure it’s safe for human use. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the arguments is that some people thought that human and animals are different because human can question their action, but animals cannot. Therefore, animals do not have intrinsic worth or rights. Another one is that humans are clever and rational, but animals are not. Therefore, human have the right to use animals as food. Apart from animals, baby, comatose and mentally disabled persons are also not to be able to interrogate their action and do not have any rational mind.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They have different views on topics such as the use of animals for scientific use, the use of animals for entertainment, and if animals should be kept as pets. Animal rights believes that humans should not be able to use animals for any purpose no matter how humane or responsible humans are with the use of animals. Animal welfare believes that human use of animals is acceptable as long as humane treatment is given to the animals. Although the two terms do not necessarily support the same cause and do not go about protecting animals in the same way, they both have one thing in common-they are both fighting for what they believe would give animals the best…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays