Animal cruelty has begun to be a bigger problem as time progresses. For instance, statistics have shown that in 2007, there were 1,880 cruelty cases reported in the media, “64.5 percent (1,212) involved dogs, 18 percent (337) involved cats, 25 percent (470) involved other animals,” (HSUS 2). As you can see, the case reports of the animals show more than one would imagine there would be. Cruelty can be defined in a variety of forms such as: neglect, animal hoarding, slaughter, having them fight another animal, and many more. With that being said, there needs to be a stop in the cruelty animals face today.
To start off, animal cruelty is a the crime of inflicting physical pain on an animal beyond necessity for normal discipline. It can include …show more content…
Domestic violence victims whose animals were abused saw the animal cruelty as one more violent episode in a long history of indiscriminate violence aimed at them and their vulnerability,” (Facts About 1). Ultimately, the decisions humans decide to take upon family members, also lead up to the pet and the cycle repeats itself. Fortunately, there are many supporters willing to use the solutions they can to take a stand to speak for animals who do not have a voice. There are many solutions one could think of to solve the issue of cruelty towards animals, but the problem is finding one that works. To start off, a solution to fix the problem of
Animal cruelty would be to stop it before it gets worse in placing a bill that does not allow a certain of animals in a home, and for that home to be inspected and the person to have a background check before allowing the animal to be brought in. The second solution would be to ban the crucial killings of animals which are not humane euthanasia. Finally, the third solution would be to not allow those with a criminal record of Domestic Violence to own a pet.
Although not all solutions could be entirely avoided, the best solution would be placing …show more content…
Najera 5
This solution is feasible because many humans are in favor to agree that animals are important; therefore, it would be easy to gather those people who care for the animals and are willing to do what it takes to get Congress to accept the bill. Additionally, there would be no cost to having the bill approved, in fact, placing the bill would open up job opportunities in having humans work to do the inspections of the homes and the background check of the individual trying to get an animal. Moreover, after the inspection and background check is finalized, it would then be determined whether or not the dog is allowed to be purchased and brought into their home. As seen in an article, “5090 percent of these types of animals sold each year dies because they were not cared for properly,” (How Humans 1). This goes to show not only that they may be in danger of a home where the human is an animal hoarder, but the home may not meet the health standards. In previous years, they had bills in the Utah Legislature and some passed the
To start off, animal cruelty is a the crime of inflicting physical pain on an animal beyond necessity for normal discipline. It can include …show more content…
Domestic violence victims whose animals were abused saw the animal cruelty as one more violent episode in a long history of indiscriminate violence aimed at them and their vulnerability,” (Facts About 1). Ultimately, the decisions humans decide to take upon family members, also lead up to the pet and the cycle repeats itself. Fortunately, there are many supporters willing to use the solutions they can to take a stand to speak for animals who do not have a voice. There are many solutions one could think of to solve the issue of cruelty towards animals, but the problem is finding one that works. To start off, a solution to fix the problem of
Animal cruelty would be to stop it before it gets worse in placing a bill that does not allow a certain of animals in a home, and for that home to be inspected and the person to have a background check before allowing the animal to be brought in. The second solution would be to ban the crucial killings of animals which are not humane euthanasia. Finally, the third solution would be to not allow those with a criminal record of Domestic Violence to own a pet.
Although not all solutions could be entirely avoided, the best solution would be placing …show more content…
Najera 5
This solution is feasible because many humans are in favor to agree that animals are important; therefore, it would be easy to gather those people who care for the animals and are willing to do what it takes to get Congress to accept the bill. Additionally, there would be no cost to having the bill approved, in fact, placing the bill would open up job opportunities in having humans work to do the inspections of the homes and the background check of the individual trying to get an animal. Moreover, after the inspection and background check is finalized, it would then be determined whether or not the dog is allowed to be purchased and brought into their home. As seen in an article, “5090 percent of these types of animals sold each year dies because they were not cared for properly,” (How Humans 1). This goes to show not only that they may be in danger of a home where the human is an animal hoarder, but the home may not meet the health standards. In previous years, they had bills in the Utah Legislature and some passed the