Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, today I am here to refute my opponent, Space World, for the crimes they have committed. There is a difference between an exhibit of art and an exhibit of animal cruelty. And today I am here to bring forth very pertinent evidence to convince you that Space World has committed animal cruelty. They froze 5,000 fish under a skating rink, do you call that an exhibition of art?
All the evidence points to animal cruelty. They froze thousands fish under ice just for amusement. Let me ask you, does that not sound like cruelty? Would you like to be frozen under ice for the amusement of other people? I assume not. Freezing fish under ice for the amusement of humans is an insult to the fish’s lives, which proves my case …show more content…
If this was not an act of cruelty would there have been such a backlash? I do not believe so. If this exhibit was good for animals wouldn’t people all over the world be praising it? The people of the world have spoken and they have decided that what Space World did was not right.
On Space World's’ own Facebook page they mocked the frozen fish by saying things like “I am d..d..drowning…It h…h..hurts.” This shows that Space World did not care about the treatment of the fish they froze. If they cared maybe they wouldn't have posted such a mocking post on Facebook. Space World was clearly very negligent and did not have good intentions with this exhibit and it should be taken it down along with them being fined.
Space World claims that they had planned a religious ceremony for the dead fish but after looking at the evidence I have provided you; do you believe that they actually cared about the fish? After the mocking Facebook post? I do not believe that Space World ever cared about the dead fish and that the ceremony was merely a publicity stunt to cover up for their atrocious actions. Space World also claimed that the fish were "not fit for human consumption" I believe the reason they bought this type of fish was purely because they did not have to pay as much money. This should show you that Space World cares more about money and their reputation rather than the lives of the thousands of
All the evidence points to animal cruelty. They froze thousands fish under ice just for amusement. Let me ask you, does that not sound like cruelty? Would you like to be frozen under ice for the amusement of other people? I assume not. Freezing fish under ice for the amusement of humans is an insult to the fish’s lives, which proves my case …show more content…
If this was not an act of cruelty would there have been such a backlash? I do not believe so. If this exhibit was good for animals wouldn’t people all over the world be praising it? The people of the world have spoken and they have decided that what Space World did was not right.
On Space World's’ own Facebook page they mocked the frozen fish by saying things like “I am d..d..drowning…It h…h..hurts.” This shows that Space World did not care about the treatment of the fish they froze. If they cared maybe they wouldn't have posted such a mocking post on Facebook. Space World was clearly very negligent and did not have good intentions with this exhibit and it should be taken it down along with them being fined.
Space World claims that they had planned a religious ceremony for the dead fish but after looking at the evidence I have provided you; do you believe that they actually cared about the fish? After the mocking Facebook post? I do not believe that Space World ever cared about the dead fish and that the ceremony was merely a publicity stunt to cover up for their atrocious actions. Space World also claimed that the fish were "not fit for human consumption" I believe the reason they bought this type of fish was purely because they did not have to pay as much money. This should show you that Space World cares more about money and their reputation rather than the lives of the thousands of