Animal Conservation Rhetorical Analysis

This documentary was emotional to say the least. The relationship of the conservator with the crew that helps him and the animals is stunningly intricate and it is hard to even understand how they can leave these orangutans in the wild knowing the illegal burning and logging that is happening in Sumatra without even mentioning the pet trade and other dramatic reasons. I would be devastated to let an animal leave in a jungle soon to be palm oil plantation since I would care so much about the future and the welfare of the animal, but also the whole species and biodiversity present in these tropical forests. That’s why I want to take part in the conservation movement, but not being a conservationist since I would not be able to handle the different atrocities of the job. …show more content…
These traumas can range from being stunned by a hammer to getting burned alive due to the illegal burning of tropical forest in this area of the world to plant palm oil trees. To my mind it would be quite interesting to see and show what happens in these forests and how these animals are treated in order to show the horrible treatment of these individuals in order to use them as pets or to kill the mother to use their children as pets. I think a big part of conservation is the education of other people in order to gather more same minded person and grew a larger community. I know it might sadistic, but showing the horrors of what happens can make other people understand faster and wouldn’t need more information or explanation to take action. I believe this movie lacked a little bit of that