Andy Bernard's Anger In The Workplace

Improved Essays
In the NBC television show The Office camera crews follow a group of employees who work for a paper company called Dunder Mifflin. One of the main characters Andy Bernard most of the time is a very calm but very outgoing guy. Usually he along with everyone else in the office can handle the all of the pranking that goes on in the office. Until one day Andy has enough and becomes very angry due to the fact that Jim and Pam hid his phone in the ceiling tiles of the office. Jim and Pam repeatedly call his cell phone while Andy searches everywhere for it. Eventually Andy get tired of hearing his phone go off every five minutes and he gets very angry, starts yelling at everyone in the office, and punches a hole in the wall. Everyone looks up from …show more content…
After Andy goes back to work after his anger management classes he seems completely reformed. Everyone around him though is a little unsure so they try not to do anything to make him angry, except for Dwight. Dwight decides that he is going to shun Andy for three years. While at first it seems that anger management has helped Andy with his anger in a later episode titled Andy’s Anger his uncontrollable anger surfaces again. During an argument with the branch manager and the owner of Dunder Mifflin Andy’s anger gets out of control. Andy begins this outburst by kicking over a chair at the Dunder Mifflin owner. He then goes on to take a picture of the branch manager off the wall and throws it onto the ground causing the picture to break, and finally he punches another hole in the wall in the same spot that he punched a hole in the wall in the earlier episode. All of these outbursts eventually cause Andy to be fired. In this case the rehabilitation philosophy only worked for a short time until Andy eventually went back to his old angry ways.
Another philosophy that is prevalent in the show is the retribution philosophy. This philosophy advocated that a criminal should be punished in the form of jail time or sometimes even death. The purpose of this philosophy is not to rehabilitate or to separate the criminal from society as with the Rehabilitation and Incapacitation philosophies. The purpose is to punish the criminal for their actions because they broke the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hope's Boy Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although his life at the Leonard’s was not flawless, he was cared for. Mrs. Leonard turned away many children, Jenny and Jason come to thought, but yet changed her license through child protective services to keep Andy as a permanent foster child (Bridge, 2008, pp. 162, 340, 435). Andy continued to struggle with the heartache his life has brought him and even turns to intentional physical pain to ease the burden. He cut his foot on a rock by the Leonard’s pool and noted, “A Band-Aid would have been useless, and asking for one would have meant surrendering the wound, its creation, and its pain”, “the single source of pain that now returned, to the exclusion of every other” (Bridge, 2008, pp.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So, when analyzing the difference between the prevention and retribution models of punishment, we see similarities and differences. Some of the similarities of prevention to retribution are the ways in which punishment is delivered. Both believe in incarceration but for different reasons. Preventionists believe by locking up convicted criminals it will prevent others from committing similar crimes. They also think by that will convince that criminal from committing future crimes.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is widely known as being blind, but this can hinder justice’s ability to provide effective judgement. Eli Ashpence once said, “A blind justice is merely an impartial justice. True justice would have eyes in the back of her head and a pair of mismatched shoes.” (Ashpence 2015) Just like Eli, I believe that to serve true justice, the situation and past of the criminal should be taken into consideration, because often, situations are not as black and white as they seem.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham were the founders of the classical theory phenomenon (Piliavin, 1986). The concept was based on several principles, which entailed three main ideologies; free will, where actions are based on one’s own rationality (Burke 2014), more so punishment should apply to the crime as opposed to the criminal, as the theorists believed that a certainty in punishment would deter both the public and criminal (Akers 1999). The perspective adopted throughout will focus on the theories inability to justify the actions of violent homicide offenders, such as Jeffrey Dahmer, and how the high recidivism rates fail to support specific deterrence, even when making the punishment fit the crime. Free will assumes that all individuals…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Punishment for criminal offences is a practice that had been present since the inception of human civilizations across the globe. In ancient times too, people were convicted and punished for committing crimes which encompassed heinous crimes like murder. Though the modes of punishments varied from what are present today, different forms of retribution were thoroughly present in those ancient civilizations. But it must be noted that the entire criminal justice system, today, has changed, and to ensure that no one is unduly punished, the criminal justice systems of different countries across the globe resort to several procedures. Today criminal law has the responsibility to meet several different objectives which ensure that justice is served,…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story of "Bartleby and the Scrivener " by Herman Melville, the relationship between employee and employer is a very unusual one. What makes the relationships, unusual is the strange behavior of the employees in the workplace, Bartleby 's extremely unusual, eccentric behavior through out the story and the employer 's attitude towards his employees work behavior. We are able to conclude some characteristics of the employer, who happens to be a layer. Although, Bartleby 's behaviors were the most eccentric, all the characters showed behavior that would normally not be expected of a person in their position, they exhibited at some point or other unconventional behavior with little explanation as to why they behaved in such a way.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: There are many unique theories as to why humans commit crime, engage with others in crime, and are lured or motivated by a criminal lifestyle. By studying these theories, one is afforded a chance to develop and then test potential solutions to this enormous social problem that has afflicted humanity since the beginning of time. The various ways of deterring, controlling, preventing, and punishing crime throughout history has changed drastically. Attempting to attack the problem of crime head on, has not worked; so developing different ways to learn why, adapt, and address the root causes of crime is the current strategy. One very important point is that the structural frameworks and contributions from both classical school of…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Kent Greenwalt (1983), both retributive, as well as the utilitarian perspective in relation to justification of societal punishments were prevailing methodologies. First, the main justifications for punishment using the retributive perspective were that punishment was in place due to the offender deserving to be punished for a specific wrongdoing. Greenwalt states that there is a simple justification for using this perspective, if there is an offender who has violated the law that others have to follow, then the offender is worthy of punishment to reestablish the moral order that has been damaged by the committing of a crime. In this particular perspective, there is a justification in place that the community, society, etc.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assessment of the Positive Impact of Classical Theory on the Legal System Through Promotion of Fairness and Improvement to the Existing Criminal Justice System Introduction Classical theory traces its origin to the mid years of the eighteenth century. Importantly, during this time, the uses of very severe and intense modes of punishment were common. This school of thought has its roots in Europe, as the region is well known to have used severe torture procedures to obtain confessions and secure testimonies that were self-incriminating. Highlighting the fundamental idea that classical theory is based on: that humans should be left to exercise their free will in making decisions and the modes of punishment used can deter crime given that their extent is proportional, implemented in a proper manner and fitting to the particular…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Correctional Ideology

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “The correctional ideology refers to a body of ideas and practices that pertain to the processing of offenders, as determined by law.” There are three main correctional ideologies: punishment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Throughout history, these have been the methods used to deal with offenders. The make-up of these ideologies connects to the public’s opinion of the criminals. Whether society has chosen an “eye for an eye,” a more humane standard, or a hope to prevent crime, these ideologies have no doubt changed throughout time to accommodate the public’s needs.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Classical school of criminology has been associated to philosophers Marchese Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham (Irving & Mendelsohn, 1985). The Classical school of criminology was a body of thought that majorly impacted the criminal justice system through the transformation of crime and punishment. Beccaria believed that the best solution for crime was punishment (Taylor, Walton & Young, 2003). The main solution to crime is the use of punishment. Consequently, responsibility was given to the government.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The classical school of thought is based on the idea that people are free to make decisions, and that punishment can be a deterrent to crime, the punishment is proportionate, fits the crime, and are expeditiously. The theory that participates in the classical school of criminology is that "criminals make the rational choice and choose to commit criminal acts because of the maximum pleasure and minimum pain," (Classical, 2012). Theorist went further to explain that to discourage and lessen crime, and the severity of certain penalties must be proportionate to the crime committed and not more than what is necessary in order to deter the offender and others from committing more crimes (Classical, 2010). This theoretical framework and thought constitute the classical school of criminology.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays