Andrew Jackson Message To Carolina Analysis

Improved Essays
Andrew Jackson is the President of the United States. In 1832, he writes a statement to the State of South Carolina about the state’s decision to reject the new taxes on importation. During this time the Andrew Jackson had already sent a message to carolina before the Proclamation of Nullification had been made. There are three reasons made in the message to South Carolina. Jackson’s first reason for this proclamation was to “preserve this bond of our political existence from destruction” (Jackson, 294). The second reason was “Coupled with the uncontrolled right to decide what laws deserve that character, is to give power of resisting all laws’ for as by the theory there is no appeal” Secondly, Jackson states that the nullification of any …show more content…
In conclusion Jackson had listed reasons why it could hurt the United States as a whole by “preserve this bond of our political existence from destruction” (Jackson, 294).
“ contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which it was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed.”(Jackson, 295)
“ If the legislature of South Carolina “anxiously desire” a general convention to consider their complaints, why have they not made application for it in the way the Constitution points out?”.(Jackson, 298)
The historical significance of the Nullification Proclamation was the solid stand against the ability of a state to deny a law created and issued by the National government. In addition to taking a stand this example of leadership for the United States provided clear requirements of individual states to understand and comprehend the necessities of the country as a whole rather than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Choctaw Indians Case Study

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indian (d) a) Although many Choctaw Indians did resist the removal, it was a quieter one than the others. b) After the Treaty of Fort Laramie (also called the Sioux Treaty of 1868,) the Sioux were granted the ownership of the Black Hills and hunting rights to various parts of South Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming. However, when gold was discovered in the Black Hills, gold prospectors began to violate the treaty, leading to the Black Hills War. When the U.S. government seized the Black Hills and offered the Sioux money for the land, they refused the money and demanded the land back.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Last of all, opponents to Meacham may find Jackson’s biography to be inaccurate in portraying Jackson’s motives and goals: to become the voice of the people (Meacham 46). They could argue that Jackson ignored of the Southern plight during the Nullification Crisis and that he could have listened to its people to deal with the situation easier and that most of his actions seemed corrupt; however, Jackson did in fact succeed in increasing the average person’s voice into the government. Though he didn't listen to the southern people during the nullification crisis and threatened the use of force, he believed that secession was treason and that the state government was responsible so he acted in the way he knew best. Most of all, Jackson succeeded…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people wonder upon how Andrew Jackson ruled the country. Andrew Jackson had already run for president beforehand. Was Andrew Jackson a Democratic supporter of the people or a tyrant? Andrew Jackson is a tyrant because he forced migration, ignored the supreme court’s ruling, and he denied people’s will. The first reason Andrew Jackson is a tyrant is that he forced migration.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of the nullification came from John Calhoun, who believed that the federal tariffs were unconstitutional, in which made the people follow his belief’s as cotton growers within the South began to hurt financially due to the tariff tax, which reduced the British demand for the raw cotton in the US. When the convention took place within South Carolina and they were able to nullify the 1828 and 1832 Tariffs, Jackson requested from Congress, to past the “Force Bill” which would provide him with the authorization needed to obtain the US Army to make South Carolina become compliant with the federal law. As South Carolina was about to be under attack by the US Army, they were able to back down and accept the compromise presented. They accepted the compromise tariff that was put together by Henry Clay. The Force Bill ended up becoming nullified by the state convention and all of the worry was over, as both sides were satisfied with the…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America has run on the thought that they will never have a king, yet they are essentially being ruled by a king. Jackson is the President of the United States and in his actions, acted like a king. President Andrew Jackson was unconstitutional because he went against the supreme court, threatened South Carolina, and went against the just and liberal policy with the Native Americans. President Jackson was unconstitutional because he went against the Supreme Court. “The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me, but I will kill it.”…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention: Voicing Diplomatic Frustration The Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention both brought up the problems in two different styles of life. The Nullification Crisis involved South Carolina trying to nullify the Tariff of Abominations. The Hartford Convention involved the New England Federalist Party, who met to discuss grievances against the decisions made by the federal government during the war of 1812. These different groups and events were two examples of ways that the common people fought the federal government overstepping their boundaries. Nullification is the action of which a state nullifies or invalidates a federal law because they see it as unconstitutional.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed that the people of a state or several states, acting in a democratically elected convention, had the retained power to veto any act of the federal government which violated the Constitution and explained that in The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, “If it be conceded, as it must be by every one who is the least conversant with our institutions, that the sovereign powers delegated are divided between the General and State Governments, and that the latter hold their portion by the same tenure as the former, it would seem impossible to deny to the States the right of deciding on the infractions of their powers, and the proper remedy to be applied for their correction. The right of judging, in such cases, is an essential attribute of sovereignty, of which the States cannot be divested without losing their sovereignty itself, and being…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 1960’s were a very critical time for civil rights. A lot of injustices still existed in America, from colored water fountains to segregation on public transportation. Many African Americans were willing to march and protest and do whatever they could to fight for their rights. However, these rights could not be achieved without dangerous consequences. In the midst of a voting rights crisis containing the brutal riots in Selma, Alabama, President Lyndon B. Johnson creates a call to action and addresses the people in his speech, “We Shall Overcome”.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Nullification

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nullification was enforced throughout the history of the United States in various places. Nullification gave states specific right to nullify the laws enforced by the federal government. Events such as The Compact Theory, Hartford convention were extremely important in contributing to today’s government laws. The Compact Theory was a law set among states towards the federation in which there will exist a government for common defense of every state.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we as Americans look back at our past, we are often overwhelmed with all of the significant events and people that shaped this great nation. When we take a closer look we can pick out a few that shaped this nation more than others. This country was founded over 200 years ago which gives us plenty to analyze, however, Andrew Jackson is one person in particular who undeniably played a huge role in shaping our country in the 1800s. A man of humble beginning that rose to prominence on the national stage and enacted his policies in a nation. Andrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1776, on the border of North and South Carolina.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Professor Daniel Feller talks in his article Andrew Jackson’s Shifting Legacy about how Andrew Jackson has received so much fame. He has not done anything as nearly significant as other presidents have, but yet he is almost always ranked in the top ten presidents. Jackson has a whole era dedicated to him, whereas other presidents simply belong to eras. Some of the main things Jackson did were that he defeated the British at the Battle of New Orleans, dealt with the Nullification Crisis, had famous vetoes, and signed the Indian Removal Act. In Feller’s concluding sentence, he says that Americans will continue to argue about Jackson.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first document that we were to read was Andrew Jackson’s Second Annual Message. The Annual Message would be the equivalent to the State of the Union Address. This was a speech that Jackson delivered to Congress about the Government policies and changes that he wishes to make within his next year of presidency. Jackson’s biggest concern was about the removal of the Native Americans. Some of his main points were that removal of the Indians will strengthen and prevent invasions within the southwestern states, it would allow states such as Mississippi and Alabama to expand their population, wealth, and power, and it would be beneficial for the Natives because it would allow them to “pursue happiness in their own ways”.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays