Anatman And The Five Aggregates Analysis

Decent Essays
The most interesting part of this week’s reading is anatman and the five aggregates. Anatman is the idea of “no-self” and/or “selflessness”. This means that there is no unchanging, eternal soul. Anatman derives from impermanence and dependent origination. Impermanence states that nothing is eternal and nothing is unchanged. Everything changes from moment to moment which refers back to the idea of anatman which states there is no permanent eternal self. Dependent origin states that nothing exists in an absolute sense, all things exist in relation to other things. For example, when condition A exists, effect B arises, however, when condition A doesn’t exist, effect B doesn’t arise. This teaching destabilizes the source of craving and therefore

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Goffman notion of a “total institution” describes an institution that goes beyond just housing inmates but as a thoughtful systematic system which is set up to control every aspect of one’s structural and social environment, similar to military boot camp. This structural and social environment is somewhat of a protective order where one’s extent of resources and social capital are under bureaucratic control. I call it this because it provides more than just housing or confinement, but an overall shelter socially, emotionally and physically. Total institution entails radical socialization and deliberately altering one’s personality by controlling the elements of one’s environment.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin the inquiry of the possibility of there being and enduring self, the argument that J. David Velleman holds against the enduring self, will be evaluated. In the beginning of Velleman’s paper, So It Goes, he asserts that the enduring self is an illusion. Velleman is helped by another philosopher, Derek Partif, in establishing his claim that anything enduring seems false in claiming that, “connections of memory do not necessarily trace out the career of a single, enduring object, and they are unsuited to serve as the integuments of an enduring self” (Velleman, 2). In the quote listed above, it helps to grasp the idea that an enduring self does not come together just because the object or person is able to remember their memories and…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now that Heidegger has established one can encounter the nothing through anxiety, one may analyze more deeply a response to the question “what is the nothing” and also to the connection between the manifestation of nothing in anxiety and beings as a whole. However first, it is important to note that though one can encounter the nothing through anxiety, we are not able to willfully experience the nothing. Additionally, anxiety reveals the nothing, but does not control it. Moreover, just because we’re not always anxious, doesn’t mean its presence isn’t felt. We are constantly exposed to this withdrawal and slipping away, of being faced with our finitude and the causing of entities to lose their significance.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrary to Hick’s thesis; pain and suffering are not needed for moral development or to complete one’s “soul-making” process therefore Hick’s argument for soul-making is untenable and should be rejected. The soul-making theodicy is as follows; the idea that God has only allowed the existence of evil into the world so that people are allowed to learn from these evils in order for us to develop our moral character; to learn and further understand values. As an end result of this moral development, we will be closer to God’s likeness and perfection and we will therefore have acceptance into Heaven when we eventually die. As shown in Hick’s thesis; God only allows evil in order to develop soul-making, but there are plenty of examples of evil that…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Paul Sartre is a strong proponent of Existentialism which asserts that “existence precedes essence” (682). To expand upon this, Sartre believes in absolute free will where our essence, which can be defined as our human character, is created by the actions our lifetime. To defend this claim, Sartre provides three key arguments to show that “man…[is] the ensemble of his acts” (690). Sartre’s first argument is that there is no determined human nature to make us do what we do, or to excuse what we do. This simply means that a preexisting human nature, which is another term for essence, doesn’t exist and can’t control what a person will do or become.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philo's Argument Analysis

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philo begins his argument from the existence of evil by introducing a few examples on why God has either not willed humanity’s happiness or that He does not believe that happiness is an essential component to the human condition. In his first argument, he asserts first that God is a moral being who values traits such a justice, kindness, and mercy. He then states that God’s scope is infinite, and he can perform whatever deeds he so wishes. Finally, he says that humanity is unhappy. This leads to the conclusion that God must not wish for the contentment of mankind.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exponential growth of the western biomedicine philosophy has created a society in which heavily relies upon the notion of fixing the “broken machine” by “killing” microorganisms. However what biomedicine leave to the wayside is the notion of holistic health – health that encompasses the body, mind, and soul. Whilst the dominant definition of health currently, some cultures still haven’t prescribed to the ideology as yet. Unique to the Latin Americans of Central America, and the Trinitarian peoples of Bolivia, Susto or “fright disease” displays many of the same symptoms attributed to PTSD. However, onset and treatment vary drastically from typical biomedical cures.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Soul Urge 5 Life Plan

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    An individual with Soul Urge 5 life’s plans will be focused on freedom, excitement, and adventure. Thoughts of travel, and freedom to explore, will intrigue them. They are not very concerned about their future or about accumulating material assets, which can make they appear to some as being superficial or unmotivated. The positive energies of Soul Urge 5 tend to make the individual very adaptable and versatile.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction John Hick, the British Philosopher was born in 1922 in the United Kingdom. Hick is credited as a profound religious epistemologist, philosophical theologian, and religious pluralist (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). Hick contributed largely to the world of theology, writing one of his more famous works, Evil and the God of Love, where the chapter Soul-Making Theodicy is included (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). The attempt to explain the presence of evil, pain, and suffering has been asked and investigated throughout the centuries by philosophers, theologian, and layman alike.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nihilism is the idea that nothing really matters and that there is no meaning in the world. This is a worry for those who want there to be a meaning or purpose to life. The philosopher Albert Camus felt that this issue of “whether life is or is not worth living” was the most important problem of philosophy (Camus 3). This is understandable, as once one has established that life exists, the next step is to understand if that life has any meaning or value. Albert Camus, Thomas Nagel, and William James each argue how one should continue living one’s life after the existential crisis of nihilism and of realizing the absurdity of the meaning of life.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republic by Plato is not a commandment in which all societies to adhere to. Instead, it is a dialogue proposing an ideal state where there are rulers and those who are ruled. Inherently known, there must be virtues established as well as a hierarchy of people who are in this society. Throughout the Republic, Plato imposes on Socrates and uses him as a mouthpiece to deliver the ideas. Even to this day, the comments in the Republic as well as the philosophical ideals implemented in this dialogue, are unknown as to whether Socrates himself has said it, or Plato.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book 8, Section 2 – “Love for a soulless thing is not called friendship, since there is no mutual loving, and you do not wish good to it. For it would presumably be ridiculous to wish good things to wine; the most you wish is its preservation so that you can have it. To a friend, however, it is said, you must wish goods for his own sake” (Aristotle, 426). Premise 1: Friendship requires mutual loving.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays