Anarchism Against Rules Of Government

Anarchism is against all of government and the rules of society. It stresses supreme freedom from whatever power or authority and control that exist within society. Anarchism suggests that all of mankind should break away from all structures of power control and live in unity on our own. By separating from government, people would be able to live at peace without having to concern oneself with responsibilities and commitment towards a legislative organization. This in a way goes along with Rousseau’s theory that proposes human nature being peaceful. It is believed that it is in our nature to be cooperative with one another, as well as being willing. This also cooperates with the idea of society corrupting mankind’s natural nature.
Libertarianism is the idea that government involvement with civil economy and social matters should be limited. Although there would be limitations, regulations and rules of order would still be in place to keep civilization under control. Libertarianism gives people more freedom/rights to liberty. It is also a form of “self-ownership”, the moral or natural …show more content…
Both also emphasize individual freedom and disagree with government intervening in personal matters. They also consider that mankind is able to cooperate well with others and work together in unity.
But besides having some similarities, both concepts significantly differ. Overall, anarchism goes to the extreme of completely being against the entire government. Anarchism suggests that there should be no form of government/state to exist; it should totally be done away with. In contrast, libertarianism suggests that government should only be limited as a way of keeping order in society. It is more practical and likely to function better than anarchism, being that completely doing away with order of power could actually lead towards problems and eventually