Comparing Man The State And War By Henry Kissinger And Kenneth Waltz

Improved Essays
Scholars like Hans Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger and Kenneth Waltz who are mostly associated with realism consider anarchy as the primary characteristic of the international system meaning that there is no central authority to settle disputes among competing member states. States therefore compete with each other due to the lack of a central authority. Realists view the world in terms of competition and conflict whereby there is a recurring struggle for power and its management.
Kenneth Waltz further argues that nature and behavior of human beings is the root cause of conflict and war. In his book, Man, the State and War, Waltz’s views suggest that a human being’s inappropriate behavior or his evil ways is what leads to war (Waltz 2001, pg 39). According to Waltz, wars result from selfishness, from human being’s stupidity and from misdirected
…show more content…
The US foreign policy has for example been the subject of debate world over and has rubbed many nations the wrong way and brought displeasure to many. It is US decision to increase its military capacity around the world since the 9/11 attacks that has causes tension and instability and has led to the increase in the levels of terrorism around the world.
Realism also assumes that the best way to manage conflict in the international system is to balance power with power, by this they mean that the only way to prevent war is to prepare for war. This has however brought instability and insecurity around the world. A good example would be plans by Iran launch its nuclear program and how this has caused instability among its neighbors. Israel which neighbors Iran fears that a nuclear capable Iran will spark an arms race since other states will do all they can to balance Iran’s power.
Realism therefore helps explain what causes conflict and war among

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Legacy and Consequences of War In his coming-of-age novel, A Separate Peace, John Knowles tells the story of Gene Forrester and the struggles he faces – both internal and external. While Gene’s external struggles revolve mainly around world affairs at large; his internal struggles prove to be his greatest obstacle to overcome. The following excerpt demonstrates the struggle of consequences as being like a chain-reaction and how it destructively affects his best friend Phineas, “I took a step towards him… jounced the limb… his balance gone… and then he tumbled… broke through the branches below and hit the bank with a sickening unnatural thud… with unthinking sureness I moved… jumped into the river, every trace of my fear forgotten” (Knowles…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foreign policies are very important to the United States. The US is recognized as the strongest nation and with that power comes ultimate sense of responsibility. The main purpose of every countries foreign policy is to survive and stay strong in today's world affairs. There were many policies put into place during the years 1895-1920. Many of these policies were made do to realism.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A persuasive foreign policy argument is vital as it interprets the relationship with other states and dictates how to interact within the international arena. It is a reflection of how the country sees the world and how it will approach it. For the United States, an effective foreign policy argument is vital to the maintenance of their great power position and to achieve their national interest. Therefore, this policy should also have an effective grasp of international relations theories like liberalism or realism in order to analyze or characterize such an argument. It should also include historical information signaling why the approach would work through analyzing what has worked in the past that will reinforce the success of such strategies and…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Foreign Policy Essay

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Mandelbaum believes that U.S foreign Policy has failed since the end of the cold war through different factors. Mandelbaum makes a strong case ideologically crusading into regime change, which invariably fails regardless of how virtuous the intent is. We first need to define what foreign policy and the cold war is in order to evaluate Mandelbaum and whether he thinks U.S. foreign policy has failed or not. He mentions that the years of 1991-2014 were very distinct from any previous period in American history and prior to this odd time period, the U.S foreign policy focused on the nation's security, rather than transforming other countries’ domestic arrangements. Foreign Policy or foreign affairs is explained as a government’s strategy in dealing with other nations to safeguard its national interests to achieve certain goals within its international relations(CITE).…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of The Mexican War

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All throughout history people have walked hand in hand with war. War has been an ever present thorn in humankind since the very beginning (Hernadez, 2010). Some say that is a human necessity. While others say that war is a requirement. Even though war has always led to destruction, death, anguish, and human suffering, history over the ages has shown that where there is war, there are rewards to be gained (Hernadez, 2010).…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Foreign Policy Dbq

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Foreign policy has been a struggle for the US, ever since immigration was started. However, many advancements were made, both for good and bad as a more modern America progressed. As Pearl Harbor was bombed, as the League of Nations failed, and as the US tried to stay neutral and isolated, the advancements of foreign policy were changed drastically. From 1920 to 1945 those changes were the most profound, as America became a more modern, civilized society. One of the vital pivot points of foreign policy was in 1941, when Pearl Harbor was bombed.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International conflict is an unresolved issue that continually reappears in our world time after time. Conflicts, big or small, can disrupt the peace and structure of the involved nations, while possibly engaging the rest of the world in their dilemma. The result of these conflicts can cause drastic events such as wars, bombings and even genocide. These detrimental results are not always followed by international conflict but are most certainly susceptible. That is why in this paper I will analyze the topic of when nations should go to war and the role they should play in international conflict.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As stated in the introduction, war is a physical confrontation between states. While globalization has led to an increase in conflicts such as terrorism, it has decreased…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will expand the Neorealist argument that international cooperation is unlikely due to the constraints of anarchy, and that cooperation will only occur when two states face a common threat. I will also present the Neoliberal argument that holds international cooperation as difficult, yet likely, so long as institutions are in place to lower transaction costs. From a Neorealist perspective international cooperation is highly unlikely. Neorealists assert that there is no overarching authority in the international system. The only major actors in international politics are sovereign states.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Open Boat Analysis

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Realism and naturalism are two different literary movements, but they have many similarities. Realism expresses real life situations and focuses on a true illustration of life while naturalism is represented like an overstated type of realism. Naturalism is based on humans versus a force that is out of their control. Short stories in American literature portray realism and naturalism in many ways. Editha, The Open Boat, and An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge are all based on these literary movements.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By first examining the history of the famous Melian Dialogue, then applying the positive, realist theories of Thucydides and Weber, then contrasting these theories with Kant’s normative, cosmopolitan beliefs, this fundamental issue of international relations - the Melian Dialogue - can be utilized to further examine the possibility of ethical action in the world of nation states, leading to the conclusion that, while ideal, cosmopolitanism does not exist as a realistic option in international affairs due to the win-lose attitude seen in societies. Throughout the Dialogue accounts of realism are consistently illustrated while cosmopolitan beliefs never come to fruition, supporting the claim that realism exists as a genuine way of handling altercations between states while cosmopolitanism demonstrates a utopian model building towards world peace yet unobtainable due to the static nature of the world, held in place by those in power, refusing to relinquish their…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism is a broad paradigm in which it is a view of international politics that stresses its competitive and conflictual side. Realists often trace their intellectual roots to Thucydides classic account of Peloponnesian war in the fifth century B.C. At their core realists’ theories have a pragmatic approach to international relations describing the world as it is not as it ought to be. Realist believe that power is the currency of international politics. Great powers, the main actors in the realist’ account pay careful attention to how much economic and military power they have relative to each other. Realism depicts international affairs as a struggle for power among self-interested states.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists and Liberalist are often times conflicting on how they think about different issues and the way they go about constructing their own nations. But, institutionalism bridges a gap between the both of them. Institutionalism functions as a neutral territory that aims to diffuse potentially competing and conflicting issues. Realism, being the oldest International Relations theory gives a pessimistic view of human nature. Realists believe that.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays