Analyzing Mark Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
Show More
A mask of lies hides the truth while the naked face is too good to be true. Mark Antony, Caesar's most loyal companion, delivers his speech with a hidden devilish grin, giving the citizens what they want, Meanwhile, Brutus stands proud and tall confidently praising his murder of Caesar, assuming what the people needed. Between the delegates, Mark Antony’s speech thrived of emotion, aggression, and sympathy which established chaos and a riot in the audience. In Antony's discourse, his pledge decisions are basic yet successful to pass on his message to the subjects of Rome. He particularly utilizes 2 words throughout his discourse, the words "ambition" and "honorable" in which the words interpretation of precisely what they are the inverse of. Desire which we for the most part think about an …show more content…
Brutus clarifies that he didn't slaughter Caesar since he begrudged him, yet rather that he administered to Rome a great deal more than he tended to his dear companion. He blamed Caesar for being eager and being a risk to Rome. He likewise talks about everybody kicking the bucket a slave if Caesar somehow happened to have lived. He fundamentally apologizes for the homicide of Caesar, however legitimizes he and his kindred plotters' activities. The group inevitably concurs with him and comprehends why he did what he did. Brutus then presents Mark Antony who wielded Caesar's body and had consented to do Caesar's tribute.
Antony's contention was more enticing in light of the fact that he related Caesar to the nationals and spoke to the general population more. He is likewise here to acclaim Caesar, not wonder about his passing. Antony made focuses to difference what Brutus said in his discourse in regards to Caesar. He says that Brutus wasn't right, and he hit the reset button on it. Antony said that Caesar felt profoundly for his kin and that he was an exceptionally humble compassionate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Antony's Speech
    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Antony's Speech

    The blank verse (iambic pentameter) in which Antony delivers his speech creates a soothing rhythm for the crowd which develops a deeper emotional bond between himself and the people, as well as, demonstrates a poetic and thoughtful resonance to the speech, which suggests that Antony has thought about how he will be delivering the message to the crowd. The careful use of rhetoric, in terms of ethos, pathos and logos, helps skillfully persuade the crowd against the conspirators as it convinces them of Antony’s credibility (which is already very high), presentation of a logical argument (“Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?”) and the evoking of feelings through the description of Caesar’s personality. The speech also incorporates repetition of…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony's Speeches
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony's Speeches

    Marc Antony's speech included him talking about Julius Caesar and everything he did to make Rome a better place. He explained to the people how Julius Caesar wanted to help them and he did. He reassured the people that the king was a great person and didn't only want to rule. Brutus had a different opinion when it came to Julius Caesar. He didn't like the way the king ruled and he wanted all the power to himself.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Marc Antony's Speech
    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Marc Antony's Speech

    A rhetorical device is a technique a write uses to establish an underlying meaning. In Marc Antony’s remembrance speech at Caesar’s funeral, rhetorical devices were used to convince the audience that Brutus was deceitful. Additionally, in President Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address”, it is evident that the usage of these devices helped to persuade American citizens to unite and remember those who died for our country during the Battle of Gettysburg. Lastly, rhetorical devices are present in Hillary Clinton’s concession speech after the 2016 presidential election. Clinton used these devices to strengthen her ideas about building a strong future.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Figurative Language In Julius Caesar's Funeral
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Figurative Language In Julius Caesar's Funeral

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome. Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    How Does Mark Antony Use Rhetoric In Julius Caesar
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Mark Antony Use Rhetoric In Julius Caesar

    In his speech, Marc Antony argues that Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong, while Brutus argues that Caesar was ambitious and power-hungry. Marc Antony appeals to the pulpit by using a past occurrence to give them a reason and an example as to why they should believe him. "When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:/ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:" (19-20 IIIii). Marc Antony uses this point to get the crowd to understand that Caesar was too emotional and had too big a heart to be considered ambitious. Caesar loved Rome and the people living there so much, that he would have never tried to put any of them in harm's way for the sake of gaining power.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices
    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

    In Act 3 Scene 2, as Brutus talks before the crowd, he defines his reason for killing Caesar due to his ambition, and defines himself as honorable for saving his country. Although Antony is simply expected to weep over Caesar when talking to the people, his powerful words are completely underestimated. Hearing Brutus’ speech gives Antony advantage over the commoners; he shows his ‘support’ for Brutus by repeating his words many, many times. As Caesar is described a faithful friend who never put him in the wrong, Antony makes sure to reiterate his loyalty to Brutus when he states “[b]ut Brutus says he was ambitious, [a]nd Brutus is an honorable man” (Act 3 Scene 2 Lines 86-87). Brutus proceeds to continue his repetition on line 93-94 by once again stating that if Brutus claims Caesar to be ambitious, then he is right because he claims to be honorable.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    Antony’s repetition of Brutus’ Character makes the audience believe that Brutus was in fact not a principled man like they have been led to believe and now see him as a…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Theme Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theme Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

    After Brutus’ speech the crowd supports his decision, they believe Caesar was corrupt and he had to die. Next Marc Antony, Julius Caesar’s right hand man, stepped up to talk. In his speech he used pathos to pull at the crowd’s emotions and logos to remind them why they loved Caesar. “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” Antony says, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome… When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.”…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Actions Of Julius Caesar
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Actions Of Julius Caesar

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Theme Of Pathos In Antony's Speech
    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theme Of Pathos In Antony's Speech

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony's Use Of Persuasion In Julius Caesar
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mark Antony's Use Of Persuasion In Julius Caesar

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus And Antony Speech Essay
    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brutus And Antony Speech Essay

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings