Analyzing Eric Schecher's Arguments

Improved Essays
In this article the author Eric Schecher uses evidence, reasoning and stylistic choices to strengthen his claim and persuade his audience. Schecher uses stylistic choices such as carefully using strong and sturdy words to exude a strong point to the audience. He uses words such as authoritarianism, sufficient, refrain and indictment to create a strong professional argument. In the article Schecher questions the reasoning of killing millions of innocent people. He does this to further display his standpoint on the matter and to further persuade his audience.
The author also supports his claim by using evidence. He states that “I could see that our Nation was divided and confused about it. No one could give me a good, clear, convincing explanation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Common Assessment Essay Over the course of history race relations have been handled in many ways. Some good some but all have changed according to that certain era or situation. The three different people were all from different time periods but all had the authority to write what they wrote. W.E.B. Dubois was born three years after slavery was abolished.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harold Kushner composed this book as a response to a calamity that happened to someone that was very close to him, his son Aaron. Aaron had premature aging, also called progeria, which eventually resulted in his death. This event really aggravated Kushner’s religious belief. Kushner is also a rabbi, which made this situation just that much more difficult for him. With this book, Kushner tells us the story on how he kept his faith with God throughout this horrible time in his life.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When an argument is made it is best to use a rhetorical situation and rhetorical appeals to effectively execute the point. A rhetorical situation provides the reader with all the information needed to infer insight on the discussion. A rhetorical appeal can persuade an audience into accepting a new opinion or at least consider it however, once an appeal is made by the rhetor it cannot be withdrawn. “Gun Smoke and Mirrors” is an option piece from The New York Times, a noted liberal newspaper. It discusses the increase in school shootings and the overwhelming need for better gun control in response to the recent Parkland County high school shooting.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “That’s Entertainment? Hollywood’s contribution to Anti Americanism Abroad” (2002), Michael Medved argues about the deceptive portrayal of the American society and lifestyle that is destructing the eyes and minds of people living abroad presented by the American entertainment industry. Michael Medved studied at Yale Law School and graduated with honors. He is a political commentator, well-known film critic, a regular writer for the US nowadays, and a progressive and conservative political consultant. Moreover, he has his own successful major Seattle radio talk show that has 4 million listeners at least per week.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nancy Wood’s published her book, Perspective on Argument, in 1995. Throughout the text, Wood refers to a variety of books that help further the reader’s understanding. She cites these sources with footnotes, as they are located at the bottom of each page. She uses small sections of a variety of sources. Also, Wood uses sources published in the 1990’s.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, Christianity is in Schelling’s perspective the only recipient of the divine revelation that once again discloses God’s spiritual oneness to humanity. However, although he decides to prioritize a particular tradition, the result of Schelling’s exploration of monotheism is God as the unfathomable unity of the three potencies. Moreover, we have to keep in mind God’s absolute freedom as regard having or not a relationship to being, or to any form of presentation of himself. Thus, it is fair to say that in Schelling’s view God is free enough to deny himself as Trinity. Hence, on one hand the Trinity is the best presentation possible of God’s essence as it reflects the three principles in their relationship with one another and with God.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1976, A. L. Guenther put forth the notion that our criminal justice system is “unfair, harsh, and biased,” as well as saying that we have a criminal processing system and not a criminal justice system. While these statements may have been made four decades ago, they still ring true today. I agree with Guenther’s comments, as our criminal justice system is unfair to the offenders they deal with, carries out harsh penalties on these members of society, and is biased to different groups over the history of America. Offenders are usually treated like statistics, not like members of society.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only is it not sufficient on its own, but it is no more important than either of the two other pillars. He argued that all three persuasive appeals are necessary. Is he right? What do you think?…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The language of war is commonly used by American culture nowadays in order to figuratively express ideas. In the essay “Fighting Words: The War Over Language,” Jon Hooten argues that integrating the language of war in a metaphorical sense will cause negative impacts in the actual world. When readers realize how common the language of war is in everyday language, they must wonder if Hooten’s statement that American culture has learned to casually use the language of war applies to them as well because of the multiple rhetorical strategies Hooten incorporates in his essay. Hooten assertively presents to his readers that using the language of war carelessly can desensitize us to the horrors of war and develop into real events through the usage…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “Apostles of Disunion,” by Charles B. Dew, we are presented with ideas of secession, slavery and racism. The overall goal in this book was to prove the causes of the Civil War. We are given experiences and background from southerner, Charles B. Dew in order to justify the underlying reason for the cause of the War. During this time period of 1860-1861 there was a lot of talk as to what the real cause of the Civil War was, in which there have been many theories and hypothesis’ from historians as to what was the true reasoning was behind it all. Being a southerner, Dew is passionate about his facts, and researches to better support his argument.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When studying the philosophy of argumentation, it’s clear to observant participants that there are different ways to come to and defend ones statement. In any given statement used in an argument, there are various ways to group and dissect these larger reasoning’s into categories that qualify their conclusions in similar ways. Two of these categories that we use to justify arguments are branch support and joint support. Branch support is able to justify its conclusion by giving premises that provide independent support. This means that each premise is independently giving sufficient reasons to reach the same conclusion.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He used a claim and a reason in almost every paragraph. The reason in most of them was that Americans need to support the war in order to protect their freedom. Paragraph 23 was a prime example of logos. He talked about how Americans have always helped out in the previous wars and how the Americans will never give up their fight for freedom. In paragraph 33, he says “Not only will we fight for democracy, we will make it more worth fighting for…we will work for the good of mankind…so that all may have plenty and security.”…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This, coupled with the questionable nature of the truth and relevancy of the premises, is accountable for the poor rating of this work. The evaluation of the argument will begin with a seven-step analysis followed by…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin also strategically uses logos to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic. Throughout the article the author discusses reasons of when torture is justified. Knowing that many Americans consider torture unconstitutional, Michael tries to reason with the audience saying, “Millions of lives outweigh constitutionality.” Even though torture is barbic, the audiences come to sense that mass murder is even more barbic. The piece makes the audience re-think their opinion torture if it means lives will be saved.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic which receives a great deal of criticism from parties on both sides of the argument. Some suggest that it is morally sound on the basis of an eye-for-an-eye ideology, while others argue that its inherent hypocrisy makes the act illegitimate. By examining and analyzing Igor Primoratz’s A Life for a Life and its argument in support of the death penalty, I will attempt to both explain and discredit his argument on the grounds that murder ought not justify murder. Igor Primoratz’s central argument is that there is no equivalent punishment to murder, which is why in cases of murder, the death penalty is justified. Simply imprisoning someone who committed such a heinous crime as murder does not equate…

    • 1621 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays