Analytical Ethics In Harry Frankfurt's 'On Bullshit'

Improved Essays
Harry Frankfurt is a trained analytical philosopher. Analytical philosophy is characterized by a special concern for clarification of concepts. In his interview, Frankfurt mentioned that respect for the truth and concern for the truth were among the foundations of civilization. However, from his observations, Frankfurt established that there was a lack of respect and concern for the truth in the writings that were being produced in his time. The concept he believed that was widely used yet poorly understood, was: bullshit. This led him to write an essay “On Bullshit” in 1986 which later turned into a book which was originally published in 2005. Frankfurt’s stand was that people are more ignorant of reality and that bullshit is becoming a significant …show more content…
That is, the lack of connection or concern for the difference between truth and falsity. Essentially, a bullshitter has no intention or motivation to say things that are either true or false. So the question of whether what he or she says is true or false is rather irrelevant to what he or she is trying to achieve. What the bullshitter says could be true, and at the same time he or she may not think that it is false. This would mean that the bullshitter is not necessarily a liar then. It is therefore important to make clear the difference between a bullshit and a lie. Frankfurt thinks that a bullshitter is a more insidious threat to the values of truth because it is hard to identify or pinpoint the truth. A liar, on the other hand, knows what the truth is but is more concerned with keeping people away from the truth. So this in itself shows a certain respect for the value of truth, because that lie can be uncovered. Bullshit is so vague and holds no account of responsibility, hence why Frankfurt believes it is more harmful than a …show more content…
From my understanding of this line, it is trying to pass a lie to someone in a disguised way. Lying and bullshitting have intentions to deceive, however, lying is deliberating misrepresenting something whereas bullshitting is not. That is, that a liar tries to conceal the truth for a particular reason while a bullshitter only cares about how they represent themselves. As Frankfurt mentions in his essay, Bullshitting is “an attempt to deceive others about one’s own enterprise and in a way that has no regard for the truth”. A bullshitter misrepresents what he is up to, what his intentions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the ways in which Pete Earley utilizes logical, ethical, or emotional appeals in Crazy. Quote from the book to support your position. The bestselling book Crazy by Pete Earley showcases the mental health crisis in America. Earley discovered the crisis when his college-aged son, Mike, suffered a breakdown.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consider the following situations. In the first, you are an educator at the local university. You hear there is a crazed man demanding to see one of your students. Upon hiding the student in the room, you tell the man that the student did not attend class today and you don’t know where he is. Conversely, you work for a large company in New York, and it is your secretary is leaving in a few days for maternity leave.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anthony Weston is an American Philosopher, teacher, and writer. He has written a book titled “Practical Companion to Ethics” that does discus Ethics, Religion, and Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics. Weston also discusses constructive moral dialogue. Constructive moral dialogue is concepts and ideas that makes our relationship with others easier. It allows us to get along with others that have different beliefs and concepts.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you will never learn. ”(Professor Faber Pg.104) Throughout Ray Bradbury's novel Fahrenheit 451 , the protagonist , Montag, slowly starts to realize the reality of the world around him and begins to question everything he knows. Montag begins to crave the ideals inside of books to grasp even the slightest bit of knowledge in order to determine what the world has become. This concept of confusion and despair not only applies to the main idea of the book, but it also applies to our normal lifestyles.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kerry Walters employs the terms bullshitting and brainstorming to distinguish the differences between two approaches to the study of philosophy. “Breaking through conventional models of explanation, methodological procedures and theoretical paradigms, even if the move proves ultimately fruitless, both entails and enriches the ability to see freshly” (Walters 31). This describes how the one of the terms, brainstorming, allow for the constant reconfigurations of ideals in search for a new perspective as the outcome. Walter also defines these words by stating the difference between the two terms. “The bullshitter, on the other hand, could not care less” (Walters 31).…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Bernard Lonergan was a philosopher who was looking for answers in this everchanging world. Lonergan was a believer that everything is always changing so our best decision is to believe the most current information that we have. As we continue on with life different things change and old situations are no longer true. Everyone is trying to figure out the world and this is because what he called our “unrestricted desire to know”.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Do You Know The Truth? When you lie are you hurting anyone? When I lie, I like to believe I am doing it for the greater good. Do you think what your lies could do to other people? Before I tell a lie, I think about how it would affect me and other people.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Credibility is more than truth telling, it presupposes that we care about the truth. Liars care about the truth and bullshitters do not. Bullshitters intentionally deceive people. Even if their credibility is not damaged, their disregard for the truth can be more detrimental. For example, social media constantly provides the general public with bullshit and misrepresents current events.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Fable of Witchcraft “He who tells a lie is not sensible how great a task he undertakes; for he must be forced to invent twenty more to maintain that one.” (Alexander Pope). Arthur Miller proves this point very strongly in his dramatic work, The Crucible. One of the main themes in this story is that of lying and how a simple lie can create chaos, more lies and overreactions. In the tragedy, The Crucible, Arthur Miller suggests that when people tell a lie that the situation can quickly spiral out of control and more lies will unfold to build upon the one already told; as a result of her series of lies, Abigail Williams became so uneasy that she left Salem, proving that liars never win.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    n “The Ways We Lie,” author Stephanie Ericsson does a great job of explaining how and why everyone lies. Ericsson makes serval points that lying isn’t necessarily bad, however sometimes lies can have severer consequences. For this particular writing the audience is everybody, because she argues that everyone lies. Ericsson’s use of historical events provide logos or logical reasoning. She also apples to pathos by reaching to her audience emotions.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deceit and Betrayal Every living human being has been deceived at least once in their lifetime. There’s always a reason behind deceit, and sometimes the reason may be to create something better in one's life. In Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare, the people of Messina face a time in their lives where their lives revolve around nothing but pure deceit. Deceiving someone doesn’t always seem like a nice thing to do to, however, good things may come out of it to bring certain information out in the light.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Suess once said, “Why fit in when you are born to stand out.” Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, is a dystopian novel focused around the habits that arise as technology outsmarts the population. The focus of the novel is a man named Guy Montag who lives in a society that has been overrun by the government. Technology has been imposed on the population to regulate their everyday lives. Everyone appears happy except for Guy Montag, who is beginning to question his own actions.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical System Reflection According to Pollock (2015) an ethical system refers to a set of principles that express what is moral. Ethical systems are sources of moral beliefs (Pollock, 2015). In society there are multiple forms of ethical systems followed; but I believe only two really conform to my beliefs. Another characteristic of ethical systems is that they are the starting grounds on which you make your judgements (Pollock, 2015).…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Ways We Lie” by Stephanie Ericsson she discusses and breaks down the activity of lying into different kinds of lies. Ericsson goes into great detail of about 10 of them, but there are many more. Some lies are for your peace of mind and maybe still bad for both parties, and some are for the better of someone else’s feelings. Ericsson believes that even if you feel you are perfect, nobody is and still tell lies no matter big or small, we do it and at times are unaware that it is considered a lie. Individuals nowadays get to a point where they are lying and don’t know whether to believe themselves or others.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays