Analytical Essay: The Duty Of A Public Prosecutor

Improved Essays
The prosecutor is a lawyer who represents the government and they are responsible for making the decision whether to charge someone with a crime. The first thing the prosecutor looks for is a sound case, because in some situations you have cases that have legal problems that could get the case thrown out of court. Example if the police officer violated the defendants’ rights while looking for evidence then that evidence would be inadmissible. Also the prosecutor needs to figure out if there is enough supporting evidence to have a higher probability of a conviction. “The duty of a public prosecutor is to present the case against an accused person by bringing all the evidence that is necessary and available, and presenting it in the best …show more content…
The grand jurors listen to evidence and decide whether charges should be brought against an individual that’s if they decide to indict someone.
“In the United States the prosecutor presents evidence at a hearing before a grand jury, which may or may not return an indictment for trial” (Prosecutor. (2014). Encyclopædia Britannica,)

If the grand jury decides to indict it returns as a "true bill.", but if not the grand jury returns a "no bill". Although a jury can return a no bill it doesn’t mean that the case is closed in some cases. Prosecutors can return to the same grand jury with more evidence, present the same evidence to a second grand jury, but in some jurisdictions that give prosecutors a choice they can bypass the grand jury and file a criminal complaint.

When a grand jury is presented with evidence the grand jury determines whether there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a crime and should be put on trial. If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, an indictment will be issued against the defendant. The proceedings are not open to the public and the defendant and their attorney do not have the right to appear before the grand

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jordan Baker Case Summary

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 16, 2014, Officer Juventino Castro of Houston Police Department shot and killed a 26-year-old, unarmed, black male by the name of Jordan Baker who was riding his bike through a strip mall where Officer Castro was working an extra job through the Department’s “Extra Employment System.” Although Castro was not on duty, he was still expected to enforce all federal, state, and city laws at the strip mall with approval from the Houston Police Department. Jordan Baker, however, was not breaking any laws or engaged in any unlawful conduct. Officer Castro claims that he confronted Jordan Baker because he looked “suspicious,” but Castro’s basis for claiming that Baker looked “suspicious” was based on Baker’s race and the fact that he was wearing a hooded sweatshirt. (Estate of Jordan Baker, by and through Administrator, Janet Baker vs. Juventino Castro, The City of Houston, and RPI Management…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    That district attorney can see if the charges can actually commit that person with some type of punishment such as jail time, probation, etc. The district attorney then decides if the case should be present to a jury and judge and may determine the sentence of possible suspect. The purpose of the court system is to make a fair judgement between the accuser and victim. The district attorney, who represents the victim and the state, who receives a case, makes a decision if they want to bring charge against the accuser. Their decision is based on if they think they can win or not depending on the evidence that is presenting to them by…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scarpelli Case Summary

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The standard for the probable cause is a low burden of proof for the officer (Alarid & Del, 2011). Gagnon 1 hearing is usually an informal one and held before a hearing officer. The hearing often happen in probation and parole office. The case proceeds to Gagnon II hearing after the identification of the probable cause. The person has the following rights at the Gagnon I Hearing a.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bsbwor501 Part 1

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    After the initial hearing is complete he/she will go to a preliminary hearing the fifth step, where a judge will determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she is charged. The sixth step will be done either by a grand jury who will investigate the charges from the preliminary…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Casey Anthony Trial

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not Guilty was the Verdict Felicia Duncan Polk State College CCJ3024 Dr. Raymond Oberg The murder trial that took America by storm. All of America and surrounding Countries was fascinated with the Casey Anthony Trial. She was accused of murdering her daughter Caylee Anthony in 2008.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abhilash Gogineni Tinoco English 1A 3 March 2017 What Determines if You are Guilty or Not? Currently around the world, there have been many topics circulating about race, such as the Black Lives Matter movement. This movement promotes minority justice by trying to reduce the number of police brutalities in society.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Selection jury is made up of (typically but not always) 12 jurors, also there are some on standby. Potential jurors are ordered to the court, and have already gone through the first part of pooling. The jurors also will fill out a test which was made in advance, and has questions submitted by both sides of the case. They use this test, in order to gauge how a juror will feel and vote. Both of the sides in a case can excuse any juror (with reason), also each has a number of peremptory challenges which can be used to pick out a jurors without giving a reason.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Jurors

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A jury is a group of citizens, normally consisting of between 4-15 jurors who are randomly selected and are accordingly given the ability to make decisions in a legal case submitted to them to pass on a verdict. A juror is an individual citizen part of the jury. Jurors are normally made to attend to hear cases in the Coroner, District and Supreme Courts. They must settle on the facts before them and determine civil or criminal matters. They are the lone judges of the validity of the witnesses and their obligations are as critical as those of a judge.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juries The jury system has been a part of our society for hundreds of years. It was first created to give all defendants that option to be judged by their peers for their charges instead of by solely a judge. This provides an excellent opportunity to those who feel that their peers can give them a verdict that is not decided by the professional judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ana Sofia Garza Mrs. Williams English II Pre-Ap 02 November 2016 Justice Many people have committed crimes. Some because that is what they do best and some because they don 't know any better and even some who commit crimes out of love, believing the crime is for a greater good. The United States criminal justice system should not allow for exceptions in the application of law due to the fact that justice should be applied equally to all. Even though a person might be disabled, a violation of the law or murder still remains as an illegal action.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the help of the villagers, Blair was able to research the life story about the brothel boy, along with the crime he committed. The Brothel Boy is far from a boy, as he is roughly twenty or so years old, who was born and raised in the Brothel. He was the son of a woman who worked in the brothel as a prostitute, but died shortly after the boy’s birth, and a man who was unknown. Therefore, the brothel keeper took him in to raise him. It was extremely apparent that the boy was uneducated and retarded, “The boy was obviously stupid.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pretrial process is very important to any case. It is important to both sides. It sets the climate for the prosecution’s strategy and it helps the defendant’s lawyer know how he needs to best set up the defense for his client. Bail is set for the defendant, and an examination of the facts is also reviewed. If a grand jury is chosen there are rules that have to be followed in order for a fair trial to be given.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are multiple stages of the criminal court process that create a burden of proof that contribute to criminal justice investigations. Every court process begins with a crime allegedly committed to determining its legal status. Law enforcement and detectives determine if the crime was illegal or legal due to the investigations. They investigate a crime by interviewing victims, witnesses, and suspects. They also gather physical evidence by taking pictures, fingerprint, and DNA samples.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics