Snow White Free Will Analysis

Decent Essays
Let us start with an example. In the fairy tale of Snow White and the Seven Drawfs, Hebert the huntsman was faced with two conflicting choices, which is either obey his master, the evil queen and kill Snow White or let Snow White free, alive. His final decision was not to murder Snow White and rather deceive his queen. Is Hebert’s decision determined or is it out of free will? To this question, hard determinists would answer that it is inevitable for Hebert to take mercy on Snow White and not kill her. Like Thomas Hobbes says, an action that is determined by sufficient cause in a past event cannot be done otherwise no matter what (Hobbes, 1654, p. 32). I agree with Hobbes on this because every action in the any past creates a causal link that …show more content…
Hubert goes back in time to change the causal past which may allow him power to kill Snow White in the future or 2. Hubert has free will. Both of these options are not plausible because for one, time travel is still a theory that has yet to prove its practicality and two, free will is dismissed by philosophers like B.F. Skinner and Sam Harris (reference?) to be just an ‘illusion’. An illusion that delusional people devote themselves to, in order to feel sense of control over own mind. To the hard determinists, our life is preset and there is only one future. Free will is non- existent in a deterministic world and is therefore, not compatible with determinism. However, the absence of free will give rise to threat against moral responsibility. This danger is mentioned by Peter Van Inwagen who implied that if everything is determined, we are not responsible for our actions and its consequences (Inwagen, 1983, p.16) …show more content…
The Scottish philosopher, David Hume is a compatibilist who describe the compatibilism between free will and determinism in terms of notion of necessity and notion of liberty. Hume define necessity as ‘the constant conjunction of similar objects and consequent inferences from one another’ (reference). This term is used synonym to determinism even though said definition (of necessity) does not match with actual meaning described for determinism. It is because Hume believes that empirical experiments do not prove necessity of determinism as its definition () suggests. Through this I believe Hume is attempting to isolate determinism and tread away from its intensity. However, creating a new word (necessity) to replace determinism is a failed attempt, at least to me because necessity’s definition has implication of cause and effect (how). Also Hume himself accepts causality. Now onto the notion of liberty. Liberty is defined as ‘a power of acting or not acting according to the determination of will’ (reference). To Hume, this liberty is free will which is constrained not incompatible in its relationship with determinism where a person’s liberty or free will is exercised when making a decision out of conflicting choices. Here again I will dare to disagree because I do not find any difference between Hume’s idea of free will being restrained in compatibilism and absence of free will in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s definition of necessity and liberty According to Hume, some people who hold the view, for a long time, that all physical object is subjected to the determination of the nature, which means that all the outcome of the phenomena have already been determined by what produced the phenomena; in Hume’s word, the outcome of the phenomena is called…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fate, Destiny, and You: Assessment Paper In class we watched the film The Adjustment Bureau and in this film there was many instances that challenged free will with determinism. It’s very hard to not think about fate and destiny. There are many ways to answer what exactly our destiny is.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cause is an event that makes a later event happen and once that event happens it must take place due to the laws of nature. With the belief that determinism is true, then a sequence of events exist that extends back in time. For example, a man decides to steal from a bank. Some preceding event, call c, caused that man to steal.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard determinism is the theory that everything that has happened in the world has happened because it was meant to be that way. So everything that happens in the world is already predetermined. If I asked my son to pick what color shirt, he wanted to wear and he picked green and not blue Hard determinism says that he wasn’t actually free to choose because that choice had already been made beforehand. The freewill we think we have is all just an illusion, like the example given by John Locke if a man is locked in a room but he isn’t aware he is locked in the room he thinks he has free will and just decided to stay in the room, this would make his free will just an illusion. This is believed because of the universal theory of causation; we know…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The hard determinist compares the aspects of moral decisions to physical scenarios. For example, the tennis ball flew over the net from the force of the tennis racquet not from any other guiding factor. The ball did not propel forward without a cause, whether it be the tennis player swinging the racket or even the wind moving it toward the net. Since physical objects, like the tennis ball and the racket, do not move without a cause, then why do people feel their own human actions can act too without a specific cause? The hard determinist feels that human desire and choices are just an illusion.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No action we choose to partake in is determined by us, but predetermined and forced due to…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The argument goes as following. Premise One states “There’s nothing you can do to change the past” (Kane 23). Premise Two states ““There’s nothing you can do to change the laws of nature” (Kane 23). Premise Three which is a combination of Premise One and Two states “If determinism is true, then your current action is a necessary consequence of the past and natural laws” (Kane 24), therefore concluding that “If determinism is true, then there is nothing you can do to change your current action (Kane 24). There is an additional premise which connects the original argument for determinism to the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Of Liberty and Necessity, David Hume argues that liberty and necessity (free will and determinism) are compatible. However, indeterminists disagree on this view. They believe that if events are causally necessary, then a person would not have free will to behave as they choose, and their actions would have been causally necessitated. Hume, on the other hand, believes in the constant conjunction of human actions, which is similar to how physical objects behave in nature. This belief enables him to expand his ideas toward the reconciliation of liberty and necessity.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a person acts of her own free will, then she could have done otherwise. 2. If determinism is true, no one can do otherwise than one actually does 3. Therefore, if determinism is true, no one acts of her own free will - Then if we are determined, we cannot be morally responsible.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps if the straw man that van Inwagen has constructed could somehow be overcome, and a definition of determinism that was agreed upon by all parties of the arguments in free will, I could move forward and attempt once again to find value in the Consequence Argument. In conclusion, van Inwagen's argument depends upon his definition of determinism, and its reliance on this definition. Consequently, van Inwagen's argument provides no useful way to conclude that free will and determinism are incompatible. I have attempted to not only argue against van Inwagen's thesis, but have analyzed his claims and presented arguments that are contrary.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Free Will: Libertarianism The problem of free will discusses whether or not there is free will and moral responsibility in one’s actions. Causal determinism, the idea that physical events and actions have physical causes, plays a main role in this debate because it determines whether a person has control over their actions (G. Tiller, personal communication, October 2015). In hard determinism, there is only causal determinism so, a person has no control over the choices they make because all decisions are predetermined, thus there is no free will or moral responsibility.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, you turn on the faucet in your house to get a glass of water. The event of turning on the faucet was caused because you had a sudden desire to drink some water. A hard determinist would say that you had no choice and that you were always going to get that glass of water, a soft determinist would say that while an event had caused you to get the water you still freely chose to get up and fill your glass with water. One of the main arguments against soft determinism is that it is an inherently flawed argument because soft determinists change the definition of free will to make it compatible with determinism. In Cahn’s “Freedom or Determinism” he discusses how the definition of free will differs between a soft determinist and a hard determinist.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Determinism is the notion that you were predisposed to make a particular choice because of your genetic wiring. Though some determinists believe in a higher power or deity, it is important to note that determinism does not admit to there being one. A big problem that arises from determinism is that it contradicts free will. For a person to be morally responsible for their actions is for a person to have the freedom to choose between what is right and what is wrong.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays