Bell-Valada (1999, p.53) expands, declaring, “[Borges’] precursor Poe was definitely a kindred spirit and even an originator.” Moreover, Borges (1998, p.196) claims Poe “created a genre”, contending all detective novels “came out of Poe; they were all begotten by Poe.” Borges’ assertions support cultural transmissions, as Poe inspired a literary movement that has retained societal prominent. Bennett (1983, p.263) elaborates, labelling Borges a “perpetuator of literary forms pioneered by Poe.” Further, Bennett (1983, p.263) discerns, “Poe is the author to whom Borges returns most frequently in praise, criticism, and explicit imitation.” Ostensibly, phrases such as ‘perpetuator’ and ‘explicit imitation’ reveal Borges was not merely influenced by Poe, but actively imitated his thematic values. Yet, suggesting Borges exclusively imitated Poe is reductive, and belies Borges’ literary skill. Rather, Borges (1998, p.196) comments, “my style … is far different from Poe, since Poe wrote in what we may call a pompous style, and I write in a rather grey, everyday style.” Thus, Borges does not reflect Poe verbatim, but challenges and develops his central notions. Bennett (1983, p.275) echoes this sentiment, observing, “Borges presents the inevitable confrontation of a late writer not only with a major precursor but with the originator of those very forms that are the necessary vehicles and expressions of his vision.” Therefore, the literary relationship between Poe and Borges is not stagnant and/or linear, as in Leavis (1972) and Bloom’s (1973) conceptions. Instead, Borges simultaneously perpetuates and modernises Poe’s ideals, merging these ideals with his own to allow fluid cultural reconfigurations. Similar factors abound in Borges’ influence upon
Bell-Valada (1999, p.53) expands, declaring, “[Borges’] precursor Poe was definitely a kindred spirit and even an originator.” Moreover, Borges (1998, p.196) claims Poe “created a genre”, contending all detective novels “came out of Poe; they were all begotten by Poe.” Borges’ assertions support cultural transmissions, as Poe inspired a literary movement that has retained societal prominent. Bennett (1983, p.263) elaborates, labelling Borges a “perpetuator of literary forms pioneered by Poe.” Further, Bennett (1983, p.263) discerns, “Poe is the author to whom Borges returns most frequently in praise, criticism, and explicit imitation.” Ostensibly, phrases such as ‘perpetuator’ and ‘explicit imitation’ reveal Borges was not merely influenced by Poe, but actively imitated his thematic values. Yet, suggesting Borges exclusively imitated Poe is reductive, and belies Borges’ literary skill. Rather, Borges (1998, p.196) comments, “my style … is far different from Poe, since Poe wrote in what we may call a pompous style, and I write in a rather grey, everyday style.” Thus, Borges does not reflect Poe verbatim, but challenges and develops his central notions. Bennett (1983, p.275) echoes this sentiment, observing, “Borges presents the inevitable confrontation of a late writer not only with a major precursor but with the originator of those very forms that are the necessary vehicles and expressions of his vision.” Therefore, the literary relationship between Poe and Borges is not stagnant and/or linear, as in Leavis (1972) and Bloom’s (1973) conceptions. Instead, Borges simultaneously perpetuates and modernises Poe’s ideals, merging these ideals with his own to allow fluid cultural reconfigurations. Similar factors abound in Borges’ influence upon