Alford, “The Craft of Inquiry” examines the discipline of sociology by studying the processes in which it is performed. The author’s illustration of the distinctions between theory, method, and research, conveys the importance of considering academic specialization and interdisciplinary study. Furthermore, Alford details the key aspects of theory and methods related to evidence while considering the different aspects of each process - specifically grand and middle range theory and abstracted empiricism, types of analysis, gathering data, research, quantitative and qualitative methodologists, etc. Alford continues on to examine Durkheim, Weber and Marx’s role in the understanding of inquiry. Consequently, the author details each of their approaches, Durkheim's being social fact and the crisis of solidarity in a divided society, Weber’s as ideal type and the crisis of rationality in industrialized societies, and Marx’s as dialectic and the crisis of production in capitalist society. By relating each approach to academia, Alford argues his claims about each social scientist - in this, he examines the nature of sociology as well as the proposed way in which to conduct an inquiry. He concludes by stating the intent of the book as a whole as a tool for the research
Alford, “The Craft of Inquiry” examines the discipline of sociology by studying the processes in which it is performed. The author’s illustration of the distinctions between theory, method, and research, conveys the importance of considering academic specialization and interdisciplinary study. Furthermore, Alford details the key aspects of theory and methods related to evidence while considering the different aspects of each process - specifically grand and middle range theory and abstracted empiricism, types of analysis, gathering data, research, quantitative and qualitative methodologists, etc. Alford continues on to examine Durkheim, Weber and Marx’s role in the understanding of inquiry. Consequently, the author details each of their approaches, Durkheim's being social fact and the crisis of solidarity in a divided society, Weber’s as ideal type and the crisis of rationality in industrialized societies, and Marx’s as dialectic and the crisis of production in capitalist society. By relating each approach to academia, Alford argues his claims about each social scientist - in this, he examines the nature of sociology as well as the proposed way in which to conduct an inquiry. He concludes by stating the intent of the book as a whole as a tool for the research